TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Agree, except I don’t think the L2000 is complicated. For me it’s intuitive despite the number of knobs and switches. And you’re not obliged to use all these options (I’m always using the same settings). Once you’ve found your prefered tone, you can stick to it - if you want.Apples and oranges so here’s my take: PBass is classic. L2000 is like a Swiss Army Knife on steroids. Pbass will give you that pbass tone which can be awesome if that’s the tone you’re looking for. L2000 can approximate everything (p bass, j bass, stingray) BUT it all has this unique color and I will warn you ahead of time that you will either love it or hate it. Those MFD pickups in the G&L are super powerful… they are the most articulate pickups I have ever played but they are their own thing. They’ve definitely got this late 60s/early 70s muscle car vibe to them - which can be awesome if that’s what you’re looking for. Me personally I have grown to love it but that’s just me. The pbass is super easy - plug in and play with 2 knobs. When I got my L2000 I literally had to draw out a schematic diagram of all the knobs and switches just to wrap my head around all the parameters you can adjust. With the pbass it’s kind of like “what you see is what you get” and you know for a fact it’s going to give you that 1 thing, but that 1 thing only. With the L2000 I think Leo was trying to take the best of parts of the big 3 basses, put them all into 1 instrument, and then update the entire electronics package. From one perspective the L2000 is everything under 1 roof and from another perspective it’s a jack of all trades but master of none.
I remember seeing a Scotts Bass Lessons video about the L2000 a while back. Interesting and honest assessment.
Here are the questions only you can answer: What is your goal? What do you want to do with this instrument ? What is more important to you - reliability or versatility.
I hope this helps and best of luck![]()
OMG! G&L all the way. The Squire is not in the same league. I'll temper my response with the G&L being in good playing condition. No issues.Hi guys
Which one to get?
Pros/cons and value as well
Thanks in advance.
I disagree. This is JV series made in Japan and the value is therefor higher then the SQ series or the newer onesAgree, except I don’t think the L2000 is complicated. For me it’s intuitive despite the number of knobs and switches. And you’re not obliged to use all these options (I’m always using the same settings). Once you’ve found your prefered tone, you can stick to it - if you want.
But maybe I’m biased, it’s not better than a P, just different.
Also I suppose the value of a USA G&L is higher than a Squier (G&L’s equivalent of « Squier » are the « Tribute »)
I’d get the G&L. Squier P-Basses are available everywhere.Hi guys
Which one to get?
Pros/cons and value as well
Thanks in advance.
Yep you’re right - not better just different. And yep once I got the concepts down THEN the L2000 became manageable for me. At that point it became fun and in one sitting I could cover stuff like Howlin’ Wolf AND Howard Jones with the same instrument. I know they’re not to everyone’s taste but I love itAgree, except I don’t think the L2000 is complicated. For me it’s intuitive despite the number of knobs and switches. And you’re not obliged to use all these options (I’m always using the same settings). Once you’ve found your prefered tone, you can stick to it - if you want.
But maybe I’m biased, it’s not better than a P, just different.
Also I suppose the value of a USA G&L is higher than a Squier (G&L’s equivalent of « Squier » are the « Tribute »)