It's the same concept with keyboards ; would you mike the keyboard"s player amp instead of passing him through a DI ?
If the amp was part of his sound (like a Leslie) I would, and have on many occasions. I used to work with a band whose keyboard player played through two dimed guitar amps- our rider had NO DIs ON KEYBOARDS!!! MICS ONLY!!! in big, bold letters on the input list and stage plot. Half the time I still had to go make the stage techs mic the things anyway.
The sound of the patches he created will be a lot closer to reality with a DI than micking his amp...... Same with bass. My sound is a lot closer to reality in a DI than through a "no highs , way too much low mids" bass amp.
I think you mean "same with my bass"- that certainly doesn't hold true for all players, but if it works for you, great. If I was working PA for your band and you asked me to use a DI instead of miking the cabinet, I'd say "sure, no problem".
What the instrument sounds like in "reality" is irrelevant- it's the end result that matters. A Les Paul into a DI may sound more like the unamplified guitar, but that's not what most rock guitarists want- they want that crunchy, bandpass limited sound from the amp. Some bass players are like that, too.
I don't play Jazz , I have a RCF ART310A amp , would you mike it ?![]()
As I said before I wouldn't normally mic a biamped rig like that (or any cab with a horn), and in the end I'd do whatever the player wanted anyway.
I was a little sloppy with the verbiage in my pervious post, though- when I said "I'd never use a DI on a rock player", what I meant was "I'd never use a DI on a rock player as a first resort".
