• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Grammy commentary

1. Adele sucked
She blew a few notes. Sort of uncharacteristic for her. She didn't suck, she just didn't have a good night.

2. Jackson Brown stepping in on the Glen Frey tribute with the Eagles was cool.
This was funny. I didn't catch it but my wife did, so she wound back the DVR to show me. She said "They sound half asleep and that one sounds like a woman." I told her that's actually just what the Eagles sound like.

3. Stevie Wonder with Pentatonics was also cool and funny.
Stevie Wonder still has chops. Pentatonics can take a long walk off a short peer. Thanks for nothing @$%ing Glee.

4. Lionel Ritchie onstage was cool
He did pretty good. The other performers did alright.

5. Thought Bieber would get booed. He didn't. Yet.
Him and all the other guys on stage with him should have been lit on fire. Their screams and writhing in pain would be preferable and more entertaining.
 
Yeah, I thought she did a good job with it. I would have preferred if they'd focused on just, say, three of his songs and performed bigger pieces of them rather than a breathless medley, but she did well.

I would have preferred if they had Iggy Pop, Debbie Harry, Adrian Belew, Ian Hunter, Pete Townshend, Peter Frampton, Brian Eno, Mick Jagger and Trent Rezner and Brian May play an all star tribute.
 
I agree with that. But she was horrible.

This. It had a Vegas review vibe to it. I hated it. It's funny, my daughter pressed us to stay up to see the GaGa thing as she had become fascinated with Bowie's death and the timing of the Black Star release, the Lazarus video, etc. She knew his work through me, but really dove in recently.

Anyway - I really wanted to see it, as did my wife, so we stuck it out. So Gaga did her thing and after, we headed upstairs for bed. Nodody said anything like "that was great" or anything. So I think the two of them were let down as well. I didn't say anything as I didn't want to be a buzzkill.

Yeah, I thought she did a good job with it. I would have preferred if they'd focused on just, say, three of his songs and performed bigger pieces of them rather than a breathless medley, but she did well.

This, exactly. Setting aside the fact that her vocal approach didn't seem to work well with the songs (except for maybe Fashion, and Fame), I just don't think any of it did justice to the depth of his work and the lasting influence he has had, and will continue to have. I think he deserved better. A 5 minute video montage with a voice over talking about him and his art would have been much preferred.

Are they? Maybe the energy doesn't transfer across the TV. They are too Olde Tyme for me and the singer makes some faces that would make Joe Crocker say "take it down a notch."

She can be hard to watch, but that is one of the things I like, and it gives me faith in music audiences. The fact that she DOESN'T look like Taylor Swift, or whatever, and they don't have a bunch of stupid dancers behind them, and all sorts of props, blah blah blah........ and they STILL are able to be successful...........that's refreshing these days.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 48thStreetCustom
Damn, when you put it that way.......

businessman-holding-gun-to-head-6879897.jpg
 
Are they? Maybe the energy doesn't transfer across the TV. They are too Olde Tyme for me and the singer makes some faces that would make Joe Crocker say "take it down a notch."

I'm just watching it now. Whoever mixed the sound should lose his job. You can tell they were feeling it onstage but the drums were dead on the broadcast. It's probably the same guy that mixed Gary Clark Jr's guitar down so you couldn't hear his solo.
 
Alright; I'm going to be that metal listening @$$hole :

F U Grammys. While you are busy giving reach arounds to entertainers and having more live performances than awards, music categories like metal, jazz, blues, classical, etc, where actually write and perform their own music, are relegated to a "pre-show" that is attended by no one except the people being nominated and isn't hired on the web anywhere (Its 2016 you jerks! Its called a webcast, look into it.) The music industry doesn't understand why it is collapsing in on its self while doing nothing to prevent it. Anyone with half a brain knows that a Grammy is in no way a mark of any true talent, its a marketing tool for selling more units. If you only give air time to performers already in the top 1%, how the @$&* do you expect to grow a broad base in music. Metal deserves to be a part of the broadcast. Nothing would have made my day more than seeing the faces on those dip$#!& pop star's faces if Ghost could have accepted their Grammy on air. They are a light weight metal band, and yet still 100x more dark than anything those sackless twerps could imagine (except Dave Grohl; he gets a pass.)

With that out of the way:
I'm sure my parents would have loved the Eagles tribute.
How did Bieber so quickly go from being a child to looking like someone that would lure a child into a van.
Dudes in dresses? Yeah I get it; its edgy and all that. You know who else does that? Jaden Smith and he's an idiot. Grats.
Hollywood Vampires? Could you think of a name that reeks more of the bad-old-days of glam metal? Where did they dig up Joe Perry; and why did they need 4! guitarists to sort of play one song no one knew, and half of a Motorhead song. I love Alice Cooper, but they guy seriously didn't look like he wanted to be there.
Adele had a bad night. She's a talented woman, but something was just not clicking for her.
Lionel Richie's tribute- Demi Lovato showed off her cleavage again, I don't remember the rest.
Having a performance from Hamilton was cool, but it was a middle finger to the other performances in that category. "Gee I wonder who is going to win this one? Maybe the only one that we got to see performed live."
I've heard of Kendrick Lamar before, and have heard people rave about his stuff. Its cool that he uses real music for his backing tracks. His stuff might be avant garde. I dunno. He isn't as annoying as Kayne. I think I can safely say I'm not his target demographic.
I think Taylor Swift has some balls for taking credit for her fame when two of her biggest songs, Bad Blood and Shake it off, were co-written by human-single-machine Max Martin. Guys like him write the songs that these performing poodles take credit for. This middle aged Swede has written more chart topping singles than Madonna, Elvis, or the Beatles.

I think its pretty clear that I didn't care for them, and don't care for the Grammys in general (or any award show for that matter.) Maybe an award show should spend more time handing out AWARDS than performances we can all see on YouTube.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 48thStreetCustom
I'm just watching it now. Whoever mixed the sound should lose his job. You can tell they were feeling it onstage but the drums were dead on the broadcast. It's probably the same guy that mixed Gary Clark Jr's guitar down so you couldn't hear his solo.

Still haven't watched the Grammy performance, but if the sound mind screwedd the pooch, maybe head to YouTube and find there performances from Jules Hollands show. It was from a couple of years ago, when they were only beginning to get a buzz about them.

When you hear Whitney sing "Hold On", and you learn that she almost lost her life to some sort of eye disease (and that her sister did pass due to the same disease), it really drives the lyric home. Although, I was floored by it before I knew the back story.
 
She normally performs superlatively and puts in incredibly impressive emotional and technical performances on the biggest occasions.

She had a bad night, nothing more.

Which is why for all she puts in, I can never quite figure out why she never seems to be able to do it for me even on those good nights. I see her giving it 100% and I can barely even muster a shrug while everyone around me is in awe.
 
My wife and I saw them live last spring and they were great. Sound & Color is a step forward, I think they're successfully shedding the revivalist tag. But Don't Wanna Fight No More is a pretty repetitive song; as my wife (who loves them) said, this isn't a song that really showcases their abilities.

I think "Gimme all your love" probably would have been a better choice, IMO. That song seems to encapsulate what they do well in a nutshell.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GregC
She can be hard to watch, but that is one of the things I like, and it gives me faith in music audiences. The fact that she DOESN'T look like Taylor Swift, or whatever, and they don't have a bunch of stupid dancers behind them, and all sorts of props, blah blah blah........ and they STILL are able to be successful...........that's refreshing these days.
I ain't knocking her physical appearance, ie her weight or fashion choices. The faces she makes are hard to watch and she has a really, really, really big mouth.
I also find them repetitive and boring AF, but that's just me.
 
Which is why for all she puts in, I can never quite figure out why she never seems to be able to do it for me even on those good nights. I see her giving it 100% and I can barely even muster a shrug while everyone around me is in awe.

Just preference and who you connect with.

There are plenty of singing legends who do nothing for me. I recognize their talent but get no emotional response from them nor feel any personal connection.
 
Which is why for all she puts in, I can never quite figure out why she never seems to be able to do it for me even on those good nights. I see her giving it 100% and I can barely even muster a shrug while everyone around me is in awe.

While she has a strong voice, I find that she has a limited range and, let's just come out and say it, could you ever do a happy song for once? Life is not all about tears and drama.
 

Latest posts