So if it wasn't for the "rebar" scene - it would be "believable"?![]()
For me the most satisfying cinema is usually ones that are realistic within the confines defined by the premise of the movie. In the case of Cloverfield, clearly it's not grounded in reality but we as the viewer are presented with the idea of a giant monster. That does not give the viewer any reason to believe that ordinary people will die differently when smashed and impaled by concrete rubble. For that reason scenes like that can be viewed as an "unreaslistic" flaw within a movie that already has an unrealistic premise.
Beyond that I find even more satisfaction in realistic movies within the horror genre such as the original Texas Chainsaw Massacre. Real "monsters" and realistic circumstances within the plot. All aspects of it could really happen.


