Mushroo:
Good work, mush.
Watch out, you have a student not paying attention to your hard work. I like when people do us the favor of thinking and understanding in addition to just rattling off questions that we take time to answer, I'm sure you agree! Call me old fashioned.
Here, he was asking about the notation difference between measures 10 and 11, not 7 and 11, as you are addressing in reply. He confused you (and me) with the use of the word "tie." So, he's asking why there is a [bar?] present in 10 (between 3 and &) but not 11 (between the &of 2 and 3). What's weird is that he then said he understood your explanation which didn't answer his question because his question was a little unclear.... but whatever... I don't like when people don't take the time read the answers they ask for when someone kindly takes the time to write!
So please confirm for me/us:
1) Lets get the terminology. Please clarify what we call the connector between two eighth notes (or 16ths, etc). I know that when they are separated they have flags but, in 40 years, I've never contemplated what to call the connector between notes!
2) I imagine by deduction from your earlier explanation, the reason for not "putting a bar" between the 8ths here is for the same reason as not using a quarter note across the &of2 and 3- that is, to readily make visible the midpoint of the measure- which you kindly addressed earlier for OP.
Ant I read his answer and fully understood what he had explained to me. It wasn't what I asked but I didn't see any sense in making an issue out of it. My question was concerning the "bar" at the top that connects two 1/8th notes. I'm guessing Mushroo simply misunderstood my poorly worded question, but I learned something from him I didn't know. I have appreciated his and everyone else who have taken the time to answer my question. So Ant here's the deal, given you don't like people like me the next time you see a question from me...don't read it.