I wasn't saying that at all. I was making an analogy to what
alaskaleftybass said about JP with respect to his impact on bass playing. When one knows the landscape of bass playing BEFORE Jaco, it is in that context that JP's contribution can be most appreciated. He was a pioneer who substantially altered the status quo forever. So regardless of whether you LIKE his playing, which is a matter of taste, you can at least truly appreciate him for the magnitude of his game-changing impact.
So it is with the Beatles. A previous poster said he didn't get what was so great about them, either. I was merely pointing out that regardless of whether you like or appreciate their music, which is a matter of taste, at the very least they too can be appreciated for the utter revolutionary impact that they had on music when taken in context with pre-Beatles rock and roll and music in general.
The Beatles were revolutionary. So was Jaco. Never said that either should be revered. I never offered any measure of greatness as Yeti suggested. That completely misses my point. I was merely finding the point
alaskaleftybass made quite analogous to the the Beatles with regard to their pioneering impact on the landscape of music.
My response to Yeti was merely to emphasize the enormity of that impact when it came to the Beatles. No other group of musicians has ever had that kind of impact on the status quo, and it will be a long time until one does again.