Taylor Livingston
Commercial User
Hopefully somebody who's not me will give their own answer, for a true player's perspective.
But my take is that you've got it pretty much how I'd do it, although I think you could try FrantaBit before Xero as well - what you say is quite right, about the bit crushing eating up a lot of the subtler details in the signal that precedes it, if you crank the bit depth very low.
With FrantaBit->Xero, FB is working to generate harmonics which are carved up and selectively accentuated by the Xerograph. Because it's a lowpass filter, you have the ability to tame some of the strong high frequencies coming from the FrantaBit in lower bit depth modes. With Xero->FB, you can use the Xero to selectively emphasize certain frequencies going into the bit crusher, which will change the sound, but the effect of the Xerograph will be more subtle. I think it can go either way because the FB can either be used to remove or generate harmonics, so it might depend on which of those angles appeals to you more.
But my take is that you've got it pretty much how I'd do it, although I think you could try FrantaBit before Xero as well - what you say is quite right, about the bit crushing eating up a lot of the subtler details in the signal that precedes it, if you crank the bit depth very low.
With FrantaBit->Xero, FB is working to generate harmonics which are carved up and selectively accentuated by the Xerograph. Because it's a lowpass filter, you have the ability to tame some of the strong high frequencies coming from the FrantaBit in lower bit depth modes. With Xero->FB, you can use the Xero to selectively emphasize certain frequencies going into the bit crusher, which will change the sound, but the effect of the Xerograph will be more subtle. I think it can go either way because the FB can either be used to remove or generate harmonics, so it might depend on which of those angles appeals to you more.
