• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Is sustain such a many splendored thing?

I've been using an AO Fender '60s Precision Bass with flats and foam lately with our soul band. The bass sounds perfect on just about everything, but there are places in a song or two where the notes die too quickly. I'm debating whether to remove the foam from under the bridge ashtray because of this, but it sounds so good on most tunes. (I don't want to switch basses, if possible.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Phaidrus
I came here to say “I’d rather have it and not need it than need it and not have it,” and I see a lot of people have already posted something similar.

Let’s all remember that a note is made up of a fundamental frequency and many harmonic frequencies, the combination of which make up that instrument’s timbre. Depending on materials, strings, signal chain, compression and gain stages, speakers/cabs, mixer, cable lengths, note attack, room size, wall/floor/ceiling construction, placement of speakers relative to corners/floors/walls, humidity, audience, etc. (in no particular order), all of those frequencies will sustain or decay differently, so the question in response is really sustain of what?

With all those variables available willingly or not, I’d rather have the full envelope at the start of all of that and have the option to shape it along the way as needs require. Give me a bass that sings. I can always make it thump.
 
Just like everything in music, it depends. Sometimes you need it, sometimes you don't. I remember a few decades or so back there was a dude who was super into Zon basses and would troll people about the virtues of graphite necks and would time how much sustain he had. Like, how often in a real word music situation does that matter at all?
 
On a bass, I really don't need it. I actually have foam under the bridge on most of my basses right now.
I absolutely love hearing a note die out semi slowly.
If you look at Mr Jamerson, you will see what I mean.
Secondly, I know that high mass bridges contribute to sustain, from experience, I know that they change the low end profile. My unscientific experience is, sub lows are enhanced a bit. To me, sub lows are good in recordings, but on a stage, they are just not good on a number of levels unless the sound system is perfect.
Even then, the kick drum needs its
Territory.
I am greatly interested in this subject and would love to hear your thoughts

J l mattox

Sustain can be increased or decreased with your plucking technique. Hit a note and it sustains... lightly press your finger down on the string by the bridge and the sustain dies off. Or, hit a note and then as it sustains roll the volume knob down and the sustain dies off. No need to have special bridges or mutes or whatnot.
 
Don't get me wrong; I use palm muting - a lot.
But when I want sustain, I want it!!
The standout in my collection is my Warwick Streamer Stage I. (I'm assuming it's the dense body maple & extra chunky neck-thru construction.) I really notice - and enjoy - the way notes don't decay as quickly as on other instruments. It makes a big difference in the lower register when I'm going for an almost synth-like presence.
I don't require that degree of sustain on every bass I own. But it's definitely good to have at least one that will do it.
:bassist:
 
If you use flats and foam you obviously are shooting for a style that does not use sustained notes. I use sustained notes sometimes so it's good to have the ability when I need it. But there is no doubt we are playing different styles of music.
 
I am greatly interested in this subject and would love to hear your thoughts
0000.jpg

some of us play fretless, and that may open up an entirely different discussion/perspective on the usefulness of sustain

per the OP: i don't want to sound like i'm making excuses for fretless, but the POV of "i'd rather have it and not need it..." seems to me to be the most prudent, especially in practice. and FWIW: i don't choose bridges based on 'sustain hype'. if the bridge works correctly = any will do!
 

Latest posts