Did I get this right?
Yup, I think you nailed it.
Edit: First post from a new member and it's currently up to 5 pages? Surely, that's getting into record breaking material.
Last edited:
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Did I get this right?
Pretty close. In post 3 he asked for a comparison between the BBC and the "Fear Stuff".
Silly me thinking I could express my opinion based on experience with both cabs (head to head in a controlled room and on stage with a band) without the usual shill showing up and claiming conspiracy and lack of perception/knowledge.
Look at where all the BBC threads have gone and why.
I hear what your saying. I'm gonna go out a limb here and ask out of all of those individuals listed above, how many of them directly compared it to 3-5 other cabinets. Probably none because it isn't often you get a chance to have all of them in the same room together.Sounded like he based his thoughts on what he understood of the design and unlike the fear people that didn't inform him that they couldn't work. The majority of negative comments have been based on people not actually hearing the cabs either, instead basing their opinion on what they think will happen. The majority of positive ones are from people who've actually heard them. Coincidence?
With your description, particularly not hearing a difference in dispersion, I didn't even bother addressing it. I've already spoken with people who tried the cabs stuck between two other cabs or some other boundaries and claimed the same thing. Or couldn't hear what by most accounts can be a very loud tweeter firing up, even close up on the cab. I don't know how that happens and frankly at this point I don't need to know. You apparently experienced what you experienced what you experienced and I have at least few hundred gigs under my belt with clearly different results. Along with lots of feedback from bandmates, contractors, audience members and some very good live engineers. I'm guessing those ears didn't lie either.
![]()
I hear what your saying. I'm gonna go out a limb here and ask out of all of those individuals listed above, how many of them directly compared it to 3-5 other cabinets. Probably none because it isn't often you get a chance to have all of them in the same room together.
I played the drums while the tank was about 2-1/2 feet from the high hat/kick drum area, slightly forward and couldn't notice anything more from the BBC than the other cabs that were on the other side of BBC.
His explanation was pretty accurate, but not completely. The driver firing into the slot chamber does act like a port, because the chamber makes it a bandpass. That results in it doing just what Duke said, adding output in the lows, but not in the mids and highs, just like a port. That being the case the side ports aren't going to give wider dispersion in the mids and highs, because there's no mid and high radiation from them. That's obvious to someone who knows how bandpass works. If you don't you might think so, and you might convince others who don't know any better that it does, but if you're going to break this or any law of acoustics you need conclusive proof that's the case. The only other question is whether the two drivers share a common sealed chamber, as I suspect they do. That makes it an isobaric, also obvious to someone who knows what isobaric is. Based on what little technical information does exist I say this is an example of a seat of the pants design where the inventor really doesn't know what it is. That's OK, many great discoveries have been made by accident, but I don't think this is one of them.Here's one of the people BBC apparently fooled... Duke LeJeune of Audiokinesis. His explanation did not include any breaking of any laws.
![]()
I'm not aware of any members that are endorsed or associated with Fear cabs other than the builders.
You and BBC on the other hand, er, uh oh, wait...
Oh snap, my bad.
Have you ever tried a Fearless?
Yes, I've heard fearful and fearless cabs.
If a cab doesn't blow me away I couldn't care less about the specs. That's not going to change, for me it is fundamentally about the performance in context and frankly the mindlessness of it is numbing. If I have a cab that can easily exceed my volume requirements on ANY and ALL of my gigs, the fact that a larger cab can go even louder would benefit me how? It doesn't... but fans look at that as some sort of "win" anyway, which again is silly IMO.
I give this thread 3 out of 5 wumps
@Brad Johnson, are you the Brad Johnson listed as the sales contact for Boom Bass Cabinets?
Considering I don't work with BBC and I'm not selling anything related to it, the usual namecalling seems to fall short.
His explanation was pretty accurate, but not completely. The driver firing into the slot chamber does act like a port, because the chamber makes it a bandpass. That results in it doing just what Duke said, adding output in the lows, but not in the mids and highs, just like a port. That being the case the side ports aren't going to give wider dispersion in the mids and highs, because there's no mid and high radiation from them. That's obvious to someone who knows how bandpass works. If you don't you might think so, and you might convince others who don't know any better that it does, but if you're going to break this or any law of acoustics you need conclusive proof that's the case. The only other question is whether the two drivers share a common sealed chamber, as I suspect they do. That makes it an isobaric, also obvious to someone who knows what isobaric is. Based on what little technical information does exist I say this is an example of a seat of the pants design where the inventor really doesn't know what it is. That's OK, many great discoveries have been made by accident, but I don't think this is one of them.
I haven't worked with BBC for a year now. I have no control over what's on the website and I still have people contact me and I explain the same thing to them.
You may notice I'm not a commercial user nor do I have affiliations listed. If I still worked for a company I wouldn't be allowed to do that.
Nice try, Colombo.
Considering I'm not in Baltimore, nice try.
![]()
Hey Wumper! I've used both and the Fearless F112 is the better I think. Either way, you will need a Great Amp to get the most out of it. They're hungry for watts! I run a 1600watt amp and it sounds like heaven! Hope this helps, Cheers[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
Are these good? Like better than the fear stuff. It is local to me.
New member, first thread.
Wump wump!
Close - very close.This thread is... I don't actually think I can describe it!
What I get so far is:
- Someone asked about a boom box, following it with a "wump wump"
- Some other people then proceeded to pick faults with said boom box.
- After some more "wump wump"-ing, another person comes along to defend the boom box from the attack by people that have something to do with fearing a green child.
- Lots more sarcasm goes around, some more "wump wump"s and then some homie buys an SWR, which I believe is a very fast station wagon.
Did I get this right?