Do people still do that sort of thing? I thought that "reading the whole thread before commenting" died out in the '90s.
:scowl:Touché.
Enjoy the benefits of a premium membership!
Upgrade Account
-
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Is this really an early Warwick bass?
- Thread starter mikeyswood
- Start date
:scowl:Touché.
btw: Shouldn't the title of this thread be changed?
It's getting annoying.
Yep. Fixed.
"Mikey",
Anxiously awaiting your explanation of why the BC Rich bass I just bought is a "parts bass" $200 POS that is no better than a MIM Fender as well as clarification of your below comment about "parts bass"es.
Very curious to hear your answer and more curious as to why you are avoiding the thread you actually started while you are currently logged into TB.
Thanks....
Brent
Anxiously awaiting your explanation of why the BC Rich bass I just bought is a "parts bass" $200 POS that is no better than a MIM Fender as well as clarification of your below comment about "parts bass"es.
Very curious to hear your answer and more curious as to why you are avoiding the thread you actually started while you are currently logged into TB.
Thanks....
Brent
I have spent a good chunk of change on 3 Sadowsky basses which based on your logic are "parts basses". Add that to the recent purchase of my "$200" Son of a Bich, I truly must be an idiot. Thanks for your guidance. eBay, here I come.
"Mikey",
Anxiously awaiting your explanation of why the BC Rich bass I just bought is a "parts bass" $200 POS that is no better than a MIM Fender as well as clarification of your below comment about "parts bass"es.
Very curious to hear your answer and more curious as to why you are avoiding the thread you actually started during your current browsing at TB.
PM me if you feel that is more appropriate....
Thanks....
Brent
Anxiously awaiting your explanation of why the BC Rich bass I just bought is a "parts bass" $200 POS that is no better than a MIM Fender as well as clarification of your below comment about "parts bass"es.
Very curious to hear your answer and more curious as to why you are avoiding the thread you actually started during your current browsing at TB.
PM me if you feel that is more appropriate....
Thanks....
Brent
I have spent a good chunk of change on 3 Sadowsky basses which based on your logic are "parts basses". Add that to the recent purchase of my "$200" Son of a Bich, I truly must be an idiot. Thanks for your guidance. eBay, here I come.
If I wasn't at work I would have laughed out LOUD here...!!
Soooo funny...!
Don't derail my derailing of this thread!
Almost a perfect sig. Good mix up of thrust and trust.
*facepalm*Uhhmmm... I would like to take credit for saying something incredibly funny. LOL
But actually, just a typo.
Thanks for making fun of it.
The sad thing is: I make as much as mistakes in my first language.
I didn't know that the word was perverted.
edit: I fixed the typo
I'm sorry Supernanny.
Low blow man, you know they won't let me back on that show, after that liter of Jack Daniels, that one time, with the bicycle, and the blowtorch..........
Brent: Thanks for this opportunity.
The Son of a Bich was an affordable model designed to capitalize on market conditions that prevented buyers from purchasing a handmade BC Rich Bich. It is the BC Rich version of a Squier.
I would love to hear a respectable opinion of Fender's instrument quality based on a review of a Squier. They are not the same level of instrument.
Once you get the chance to own an American made actual Bich your opinion of BC Rich will become respectable.
On the second part:
I am no longer thirteen and I have a life. I do not sit around waiting for someone to type a new post.
Arguing on the internet is the same as running in the Special Olympics. I am rooting for you Brent; I hope you win.
Mike
The Son of a Bich was an affordable model designed to capitalize on market conditions that prevented buyers from purchasing a handmade BC Rich Bich. It is the BC Rich version of a Squier.
I would love to hear a respectable opinion of Fender's instrument quality based on a review of a Squier. They are not the same level of instrument.
Once you get the chance to own an American made actual Bich your opinion of BC Rich will become respectable.
On the second part:
I am no longer thirteen and I have a life. I do not sit around waiting for someone to type a new post.
Arguing on the internet is the same as running in the Special Olympics. I am rooting for you Brent; I hope you win.
Mike
If you are saying that Squier and Fender are equal then I suggest that you get off of the computer and get yourself to a bass store.
By that logic anybody driving a POS Chevy is in actuality driving a Cadillac.
By that logic anybody driving a POS Chevy is in actuality driving a Cadillac.
Not to start the Fender+Squier debate again.
My point is you seem to not know much about Early Warwicks with your Bawwww hawwww haww thread.
Early BC Rich basses since I doubt you've played or heard the POS bass in question.
No i'm saying the Early Squiers, the MIJ JV series and Fugi-Gen MIJ Squiers are much BETTER basses than a lot of the USA Fenders I've played and owned.
FWIW checked the Price difference on an 68-70 Chevelle or Camero compared to the 68-70 Cadillac?
All basses should not be painted with such a broad brush just because a bass dosen't cost a $1000 dosen't mean it's not a great bass. Some basses that do cost $1000 can be junk.
