• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

IYO, the BEST LOOKING bass EVER!!!!

No GB's as yet! Unbelieveable! :eyebrow:

spitfire2_Big.jpg


thuya_big.jpg


rumour2_big.jpg


GB Guitars Home

:cool:
 
this thread has made me realize a few things.

I appreciate a lot the clean simple lines of Leo Fender's designes. Thats really what works best for me (but not sunburst, can't get with sunburst)

A seven string active pickup'd carvedy figured wood fretless is really a differnet instrumnt than a P bass. A P Bass has more in comon with a Les Paul guitar than such an intrument.

Not a big fan of the fashonably figured woods, just not my thing. But when you take the fancy wood, putting eight knobs and six switchs on it is really remarkaably not elegant. Functional yes, but less elegant than putting a football helmet on your favorite super model.

To each their own of course, if it works for you rock on.
 
I am amazed at how most of the basses in this thread look virtually unplayed, un-gigged at least.
It also difficult for me to imagine what they will look like with the "wear and tear" of years of playing on them.
Another question is probably a bit "hippy-dippy" but how many of these exotic woods are endangered species from rainforests and how do people feel about the ramifications of that?
True using exotic wood for a musical instrument is somehow more "noble" than using it for a cigar humidor or the instrument panel of a yacht but still...
I can't imagine this bass player laying it down on a bubinga what have you and looking as cool as he does with this very nice Kay bass.
But it all kinda comes down to personal taste.

The Brubaker I posted is gigged every week. Every piece of wood on the bass is Maple. For some reason it's far easier for me not to beat up a bass than cause careless damage. And I only carry it around in a gigbag:eek:. So while I have basses with years of "use", "wear and tear" just isn't part of that equation for me.
:D

A lot of the wood you see isn't endangered. Spalted Maple certainly isn't.

BTW I had one of those very Kay basses you posted and for reasons I still can't recall (and no, I was neither drunk nor high at the time), I sold it. I have another, later model Kay now but it's not as cool as the Howlin' Wolf.

DSC06616.jpg
 
I am amazed at how most of the basses in this thread look virtually unplayed, un-gigged at least.

My bass gigs out regularly, and i've also seen other basses here at gigs.

It also difficult for me to imagine what they will look like with the "wear and tear" of years of playing on them.

Put together the high price tags, the tender loving care of the owners, and the hard poly finish, and years of wear and tear won't show at all. My bass is 14 years old and it still shines after a light buffing. No dings made by me, and no big dings at all. I find that basses should last forever if proper care is taken.

Another question is probably a bit "hippy-dippy" but how many of these exotic woods are endangered species from rainforests and how do people feel about the ramifications of that?

I can't see how cutting down a maple tree is any worse than cutting down an endangered one. In the long run, as the prices of endangered woods goes up, the monetary incentive to actually farm them becomes attractive enough for people to do it, and everyone wins.

True using exotic wood for a musical instrument is somehow more "noble" than using it for a cigar humidor or the instrument panel of a yacht but still...

Exotic wood "on the tree" is remarkably uninteresting. Again its all wood, which is great for making basses. If it happens to look good in the process, that's a perk.