To make sure that people read this, I thought to post it again. I hope that this helps one to think about things well. Thanks for checking this out. You don't have to comment, but I would like you to read it. Thanks Cats.
Jeff
On Tuesday, I asked people to write up the names of all the bass players that they knew of who endorse the idea that practicing with a metronome helps you develop good time. After two days, Alan Vorse was the only guy to contribute a list. Here it is. Well done Alan.
Andy Laverne:
http://www.bassplayer.com/story.aspx...erms=metronome
Jeff Andrews: [Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
Kai Eckhardt:
Invalid Link Removed
John Goldsby:
Invalid Link Removed
Beaver Felton:
Link Removed
Dave LaRue:
Invalid Link Removed (Thanks Jimmy).
Adam Nitti:
http://www.adamnitti.com/patterns_two.shtml
Stu Hamm:
http://www.stuarthamm.net/
Billy Sheehan: [Invalid or Expired Link Removed] (Exercise 4)
Dave Liebman: [Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
Steve Gadd:
http://www.performing-musician.com/p...s/techthat.htm
Mike Stern: [Invalid or Expired Link Removed] (last video).
John Scofield:
Dave Hungate
Tony Grey
Mark Egan
Lynn Seaton
Michael Moore
Dave Douglas
Dave LaRue
John Pattitucci
Jimmy Raney
Robert Fripp (seen backstage practicing with a metronome)
Ralph Towner
John McLaughlin
I appreciate Alan’s contribution. Thanks Buddy. You did your homework. I reviewed some links quickly and discovered that some guys used metronomes as bandmembers in their clinics, not as learning tools, which is what I asked for originally (“List all the players who state that a metronome contributed to their sense of time”

. I’ve used metronomes myself in clinics as a drummer, or my foot, or a drum machine or a real drummer.But, I will never state that my sense of time came from a click because it didn’t. This is what I was looking for.
To continue, Billy Sheehan, in fact, dismisses the idea that a metronome contributed anything toward his good time sense (we toured together for 2 months and talked about this). The John McLaughlin and John Scofield filmclips are ads. They were hired to do Korg videos to promote their metronome and had to invent simple exercies for the film date that they were paid to perform in.I know them both and they never believed that a metronome was a part of their developed sense of time. David Hungate apparently once commented, “the best way to develop good time is to play with people with good time, but since they won't let you the next best thing is to play with the records they are on." If this is true, then you have found Hungate’s preferred choice to acquire good time and a metronome isn’t a part of it.
Yet some on this list do believe that a metronome was instrumental in helping them acquire their sense of time. I lament this, because the implication is that if there were no metronome in the world to help the metronome supporters acquire their sense of time, then they must have believed that they weren’t good enough musicians to learn how to play in time without it. That is a sad thing to believe about yourself.
On this thread alone, there have been over 9,000 viewings of what we’ve been writing back and forth to each other. Yet, only one guy offered a list of around 30 names. Even if I artificially multiply this list by 10, you will still only come up with 300 names of teacher/players nationwide who support the notion that a metronome is a tool that helps to provide good time to those who use it. I am not impressed with the turn-out. This was the metronome supporters' opportunity to show enough circumstantial proof that lots of great players share their belief in the validity of practicing with a click. But, out of over 9,000 viewers, only one guy stepped up to the plate and this is EXACTLY what I thought was going to happen. A couple of guys offered a couple of names as well. This is why I opened up the possibility to list these guys. I knew that few could or even would try to offer some circumstantial evidence that metronomes are a firm part of many pro's developmental life their claim. Why? Because they can’t! There aren’t many metronome supporters in the pro ranks who believe in practicing with metronomes as much as some on Talkbass or other places do.
At this point, I am done with discussing metronomes. I have nothing else that I can offer. My well runneth dry! I tried via historical precedence, industry requirements, conservatory methodology, elements of practice that go back a long long time, and now, a little bit of general proof to show that if you wish to learn how to play in time, you have to go about it in a different way. Frankly, metronome supporters here have have lost any credibility because now it is just talk without substance. Only Alan Vorse came forward. Good man! In fact, I predict that there will be a discussion like you've never seen. People will dissect each word, examine and punch holes in almost every sentence that I've written. Please report back and let me know when this takes place, because it is absolutely coming.
Regarding clicks, you can jam with it, practice subdivisional ear training with it, but you will never in a million years acquire good time from practicing with it. Let’s move on to something else because the guys who want to improve already got the message.
P.S. In the last several days I asked everybody to list anything that is best learned in time. Nobody came up with one single thing. This is hardcore proof that absolutely everything that is learned is best learned out of time until you have learned it well. Everything, without exception is best learned this way! If one cannot mention anything anywhere that is best learned in time, then logic suggests that music must be included in this universal principal as well.
Thanks for reading.