• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

just paid $3.85 a gallon

Petebass said:
... and our Dollar is not getting weaker, which kind of put's Smash's arguement about the decining US dollar into question.

Thank-you for giving it some thought. To some degree you're correct.

I focused on the currency aspect the most in an effort to explain it simply - in the past people have said some of those examples like about the basses helped them understand - and because I know that in the US people are not commonly made aware, say at the top of the news hour like we might be told in Canada or Australia that (in our case) the dollar is at a 25-year high or (in the case of the US) a 5-year-low representing a whopping 40% drop during that time.

That's only part of the reason for the nominal increase in gas, and while our money has gone up comapared to the US dollar the price of oil has gone up higher and ultimately oil is traded on the "spot / futures market" so it goes up for everyone. In Canada we alternate with Mexico as the single country biggest exporters of oil to the US, but the price goes up for us too because everyone pays for it on the futures market, our oil producers don't just say "well, we'll sell for less domestically just to be good to our countrymen even if we lose big on the deal" since ultimately they owe their shareholders first and foremost (and it'd probably violate the free trade pacts we have with the US).

Some countries have started to dictate where their oil goes (see Chavez vs. Bush) or repatriate some of their oil fields or uranium reserves, and I think you'll increasingly see that kind of action vs. "free market". "Energy Security" will come first, and as I said some countries are already hip to that but in the West we're slow to grasp the concept as it has only very recently become a buzzword despite it being talked about here and many places besides for a heck of a lot longer, even decades Sad, no? Why was this not a main issue last election ... in any of our countries? :eyebrow:

But back on topic, part of our gas price increases, say in Canada and Australia, are due to the large amount of taxes on gas. In the States it's only something like 15-20%. Here, it may be as high as 40%-60% so while in the States if gas goes up $1.20 we know that's 20% tax, if it goes up $1.20 here it seems like the same increase (despite the currency advantage as you mentioned) but in fact it may have only gone up 70c and the rest of the $1.20 is the tax difference, but at the pump it looks like the same $1.20 increase while in fact the price that is actually gas not tax went up much more, in this example a whopping 42% more, in the States.

In Canada, Europe, I think Australia too, the high taxes are put to good use for the most part and the idea behind them is "hey, if a litre of gas normally costs 50c let's say we charge 50% in Federal and Provincial taxes to make it a total of 75c per litre and that extra 25c per litre will give us enough for roads maintenance, health care, and still leave millions to embezzle and kick back to our cronies." But when the price of gas skyrockets to maybe $2 now that tax is suddenly yielding them $1 per litre so we need to pressure gov't to make the tax a flat levy per litre or at least lower the percentage so that the prices at the pump are lowered. It is a public issue here, have you heard talk of this in Australia or have our European TBers heard this type of talk? - please let me know.

My point here, and like the currency example this is only a small part of the bigger picture, is that while prices may seem to go up similarly in Canada and Australia as in the US, despite our much stronger currencies (in the past 5 years) much of our increases is taxes whereas the bulk of the rise in the States is real cost of gas.


I'll admit I don't have an intimate knowledge of the US political situation so I have no doubt that it is indeed part of the problem,

I don't think it's the political situation - at least not in the past - but it will be going forward as countries buy up foreign oil fields and oil suplies (and uranium) and perhaps out of spite (Chavez) or some war issue other countries hold back production.

Believe it or not, in the past *including during the oil crisis of the 70's* OPEC saved our asses in the West by releasing millions of extra barrels a day to keep prices down even though they were PO'd at Truman in the US over Isreal issues. This cost OPEC not only huge profits but also severely damaged their prime oil fields due to this overproduction which massively curtails the longevity and overall future production of those fields.

This is historical fact, known to most in the oil biz, and not my opinion. You can read more about it at the link at bottom.




but perhaps the larger problem is the profiteering by the oil companies. As soon as there's a problem in the middle east (Iran this time), the oil companies use it as an excuse to justify a price hike. When accused of profiteering, they deny it and then go on to report record profits 6 months later.

Nope, they're just lucky (along with their shareholders! - and anyone can own these companies any day you want!) beneficiaries of the turmoil. When there are supply disruptions or speculation of increased future demand, etc. the speculators run the price up on the spot/futures market and eventually that filters to the refineries, to the delivery drivers who truck the gas to your station, and finally as a price increase at the pump. At the same time the cost of recovering the earth's dwindling oil supplies is increasing very dramatically, but of course for now the oil companies are coming out ahead.


Of course buying shares in Mobil eases the pain right now, but if EVERYONE does it, the cost of Mobil shares will be pushed up by demand and we're back to square 1. We really are snookered!

On Talkbass I have recommended the stocks I linked on the last page - Suncor and Sassol - since they were at about 1/3 tto 1/2 their current prices so that's a double/triple. And many others that have done as well or better the past couple years. The thing is, not close to "everyone" has bought in, and yes if people buy after you it could drive the price of your shares up. Good ! Even if everyone did buy in and the price ceased to go up, you'll still reap increased dividends from those shares due to the increased profits due to the increased prices we're all paying for oil/gas.

$5 for a pint of beer is a lot if you are just a customer, but if you own the pub and it's mostly going back into your pockets then it's not so bad eh? Same concept.


EDIT:- Smash I just read thish back and if it sounds like I'm picking on you, I apologise. In fact, it's the opposite. Your arguements have stimulate my thinking about the topic and have covered scenarios I hadn't yet considered.

Your post is excellent and I am a big supporter of debate along any other lines than "damn OPEC" or "we're all victims". I'm glad to answer to or explain/defend any position I take. If I am proven wrong, I will thank you profusely because I need to know since I have real money behind my words and it can pay off as well for anyone as it does for me (that's partly why I bother to type all this, as a sort-of constant self-check I do). It doesn't take any more than the cost of a new bass and rig to get into the markets, and in some cases much less.

For example, I started a sample portfolio almost 3 months ago (almost all energy based shares mostly trading under $1) that cost only $1000 Canadian to get into in a thread titled "Beginning Investing" - less than a new MIA Fender. So far, the sample portfolio is "diversified" into 10 different stocks and currently up almost 60% in under 3 months. So, if someone had put $10000 into it they'd be up about $6000 since then. That's a lot of gasoline, or money for G.A.S. if you prefer. I will be updating that thread going forward, so if anyone cares to have a discourse on that topic please participate there. Best of all, several TBers are smart about investing and they can and do provide differing views as my approach is not for everyone.

Anyway, that's the "hedging" I spoke of earlier (past page), and if oil keeps rising you'll make it back on your shares going up. If oil tanks you'll save at the pump but lose it on the shares, but at least you've effectively "hedged" and locked in today's prices and if gas triples tomorrow you and your family will be fine.

It's the same idea as locking in the interest rate on a long-term mortgage, which I think everyone understands. In that case you're saying "hey I think interest rates can only go up and if they do I'll lose my home and I can't afford that so I'll lock it in and know what the cost will be". People do it because a home is important and I suggest they need to do it with other important things such as their travel (freedom?) costs, perhaps water someday as it becomes more scarce, electricity maybe, etc.

That is how the futures contracts work, and that's what some businesses and governments do to ensure they'll know their costs going forward no matter what the "free market" does. All I am saying is that anyone can do it. Why they don't teach this in school rather than crap like dissecting fetal pigs is beyond me - just proof of what a waste the public curriculum is IMO, but of course I digress.

And for those who do want a conspiracy theory - the oil president gets elected and oil prices start rising incessantly since that day. Obvious? Who bet accordingly? It's never too late to act on your impulses, however crazy they might seem.

I am not saying "listen to me I am right", but am saying let's elevate the discourse and let's consider other causes and options and be proactive. Everyone seems sure it'll continue, but who is doing anything about it? This is obviously a serious thing that affects many, and hits hard on some people's budgets, costs of operating their business, and ability to move freely (or affordably). It's up there with food and lodging. Serious stuff. IMO.


I know to some I must come off as a crank or obnoxious know-it-all, but I can't be bothered to soften my tone to appear more moderate or likeable while the message gets lost, but really I'm going for empowerment here and encouraging people to think a bit beyond the most simple scapegoats and news blurbs. I wouldn't be advocating this stuff if I didn't know first-hand it can be done. Some can offer car advice if they're mechanics, some can offer musical theory advice if they're music school grads, and some can offer economic and investing advice. That's my expertise and I'm trying to share. Ultimately of course people have to think for themselves and make their own decisions.


Other major reasons for global price increases include the future scarcity of oil vs. booming demand (China, India), hoarding by some governments (China, members of OPEC since Saudi Arabia is a net *importer* of natural gas if you can believe it!), etc. This can explain it very well - http://www.twilightinthedesert.com/ It's all documented with OPEC and the major oil companies' own documents. It's no doomsday theory, it's simple sense. The oil party is crashing to a halt at some point this century, no one is sure exactly when, and those in the know are starting to panic. That drives prices higher, and we've only just begun. Last year I wrote that soon $3 a gallon would seem like a wonderful fairy tale. This year I'll say the same thing about $4 and even $5 a gallon. And I'll quote that when it's $6 or $7.

If you don't believe me, surely you'll believe Tower of Power?

http://www.lyricsdownload.com/tower-of-power-there-s-only-so-much-oil-on-the-ground-lyrics.html

"There's only so much oil in the ground
Sooner or later there won't be none around
Alternate sources of power must be found
Cause there's only so much oil in the ground

There's only so much oil in the earth
It's a fact of life - for what it's worth
Something every little boy and girl should know since birth
That there's only so much oil in the ground

There's no excuse for our abuse
No excuse for our abuse
We just assume that we will not
Exceed the oil supply
But soon enough the world will watch the wells run dry."

:bassist:
 
mike_v_s said:
I'm scared to see what New Zealand love affair you'd like to replace it with.....


Mike

Touche.

Do I go for small, economical cars.

Or do I go for large V8s, which comes with the other great American loves; funk, soul, jazz, hip hop, blues..........

I concede, the choice is clear.

Then again you also gave us the Pussycat Dolls.
 
nonohmic said:
The american love affair for the car, the largest possible car, has filtered down here and it really ticks me off.

Make sure you're ticked off at the right people...
If everyone is paying the same for a barrel of crude & we are 'only' paying $3/gallon to your $5/gallon...that's on you guys.
In fact, we should be ticked off at you for putting up with it as, no doubt, that only helps motivate driving up the price here!

Are you ticked off even more now?
Good!





;)
Early Tuesday humour...


SMASH'd is a posting machina!
 
I'm in the final stages of buying a Ninja 250 as a commuter bike. I've just about convinced myself of it. Lots of twisties between home and work, and it gets 70+MPG. Kawasaki has a deal where you can make $69/mo payments for the first 6 months... the savings on gas will almost pay for that itself!

And, I'll still have a bike instead of burning it in my car engine.

:D
 
Diggler said:
I'm in the final stages of buying a Ninja 250 as a commuter bike. I've just about convinced myself of it. Lots of twisties between home and work, and it gets 70+MPG. Kawasaki has a deal where you can make $69/mo payments for the first 6 months... the savings on gas will almost pay for that itself!

And, I'll still have a bike instead of burning it in my car engine.

:D
My bike days are long gone. There are two types of motorcyclists - those who have had a crash, and those who are going to have a crash. And from my experience, bikes like the Ninja series that encourage hard cornering are the worst for that. Please be careful.

Sorry for the sidetrack, but I thought it was necessary.
 
Ask Munji how much fun he had on bikes.

I put about 150K miles on earlier in my youth. I threw in the
towel as the drivers here are so bad it is scary. I felt like
Christopher Walken playing Russian Roulette in the Deerhunter.
I got while the getting was good.
 
Bikes are a lot of fun, and most riders (with exception of the idiot douchebag crotch rocket kids) are pretty responsible, and handle their bikes safely. It's everyone else you have to worry about, they are morons. My last bike, I kept about two weeks. I enjoyed it, but one day on my way home from work, I had a soccer mom in a mini van pull out RIGHT in front of me.....I missed them with hard braking luckily. Not 5 minutes later, I had another car riding 5-6 feet off my back tire at 60mph for miles. Began to feel like a target, and I've already had one hard bike crash before in my life.....so I said screw it, and sold the bike. It's a lot of fun, but it is too bad others on the road aren't responsible enough to share the road safely with others.
 
I already had my crash; I spent a week in the hospital 15 years ago and haven't been back since. Unfortunately back then they didn't have the MSF course, and the only safety equipment I had on was my helmet. My knee was torn open, my ankle was broken and the skin ground off and of course had road rash on my hands and arms. If I had proper gear, I would have had been bruised up instead.

I have a decent commute during the off-peak hours and this time, I'll be wearing full gear with armor each and every time I'm on it and will be taking the MSF course. From all the research I've done, the little Ninja isn't much like its bigger brothers and is a great beginner's bike, which is what I'm demoting myself to again. This time I'm doing it right.

My guitar player started out on a SV650, then went to a 1000. Now he has a cruiser. Those supersports are huge; it's like straddling a Volkswagen Beetle.
 
Ívar Þórólfsson said:
According to the Shell website in Australia, the average price is 1.33 AUS $ which is 0.99 US $ which makes the gallon of gas 3.97 US $ not $5.30 as you stated above. Everyone here is talking in US $

So you don´t have it as bad as Europe...
Well I couldn't see it cheaper than $1.40 per litre when I filled up yesterday, so either Shell are padding their figures a bit, or Sydney is more expensive than the national average.

Also don't forget we have an added struggle because our country is so spread out that the distances many Aussies cover for example, just to get to and from work would see many Europeans crossing into another country. Our public transport system is vitrually useless. Funnily enough it was brilliant in 2000 when the Olympics was on. I wish we could have maintained the urgency instead of letting it slip away.
 
I saw gas at $1.04 / liter the other morning, so let's use $1.10 CDN per liter.

For a US Gallon that'd be $4.16 CDN or $3.69 USD.

Factor how much of that is taxes and it's really only about $2.21 USD per gallon I'm paying.

The average gas tax in the States in 2002 was 42c per gallon so at $3.85 per gallon you might pay in the States that'd be a real price for the gas of $3.40 per gallon, or over 50% higher than the real price for the gas here in Canada.

That's a much different, and much more meaningful, comparison that just multiplying our pump price into gallons to get that initial $3.69 figure which seemed to be comperable but as I've illustrated really isn't at all.

[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]


By contrast, our average is currently $1.06 CDN or $0.94 USD per gallon tax vs. your avg. of $0.42 per gallon. The big difference comes if (when?) the price of gas doubles - your taxes will still be $0.42 per gallon and ours will jump to $1.88 USD per gallon. If nothing else, ours should be a flat amount of tax rather than a percentage, similar to the US model.
 
Higher prices are good for many reasons. The biggest is that people will drive less and use less electricity, thus slowing global warming, pollution and a lot of other negatives that are not priced out in oil.

If US gas were properly priced it would not be around $12 gallon ... this would include road building, use, policing; auto registration and recycling, and all of the other costs that now are paid for out of general funds. We essentially use a big chunk of our income tax dollars (and product purchase revenues) to keep those SUVs on the road.

I say 'we' because I have to pay US taxes (even though I live in Hong Kong, and I also pay Hong Kong taxes). I can't say that I've gotten much benefit from all of the SUVs that my tax dollars keep on the US roads.
 
An interesting article sent to me, relevant to this thread, some of the more sensational bits quoted below. Nothing new, but I think it's accurate.

"In 1998, oil was just $10 a barrel, and today it is $75."

"One difference is that the oil crises back in 1973 to 1974 and again in 1978 were political problems. Today, the oil crisis is a problem of diminishing supply and increasing demand. In other words, this time, there really is an oil crisis."

"Although I did see oil prices slide back down in the 1970s, this time, I believe they will go higher, not lower. I wouldn't be surprised if we soon see oil at over $100 a barrel and gasoline at $5 to $12 a gallon at the pump."

[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]


Bonus article, talks about silver as a good easily affordable investment, pertains to discussion of US Dollar which is still sliding fast.

"The primary reason I'm in real estate, oil, gold, and silver is because the U.S. dollar has become the peso the world. It's becoming more and more worthless as the U.S. is the world's biggest debtor nation.

Just how badly is the U.S. borrowing money? According to the Treasury Department, America's first 42 Presidents (from George Washington to Bill Clinton) borrowed a combined total of $1.01 trillion from 1789 to 2000, Between 2000 and 2005, President George W. Bush has borrowed $1.05 trillion -- and he's got a few more years left to go."

[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]


EDIT - Today's front page story here was the CDN dollar moving over 90c USD and due to go above par by year's end. Do currency values make headline news, or any popular news, anywhere else? I'm very interested in knowing. Might seem o/t, but you can't talking rising commodity prices without a look at the trend in the currency those commodities are denominated in.

Here's a good one, again along the lines of what I'd said above and in previous threads :

"Energy Nationalization Reshapes Politics"

http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/060502/energy_grab.html?.v=2

"Some analysts believe this approach will only embolden more countries to follow Venezuela's lead, arguing that the world's largest private oil companies -- with diplomatic support from Western governments -- should resist being strong-armed out of existing contracts.

"Either you hang together, or you surely will hang one by one," said Larry Goldstein, president of the Petroleum Industry Research Foundation, a New York-based industry-financed think tank."

Check this out - Gas for < $1 / gallon !!

http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/060508/gas_bank.html?.v=2

A unique, simple, and very smart version of the hedging concept I mentioned above.
 
westland said:
Higher prices are good for many reasons. The biggest is that people will drive less and use less electricity, thus slowing global warming, pollution and a lot of other negatives that are not priced out in oil.

If US gas were properly priced it would not be around $12 gallon ... this would include road building, use, policing; auto registration and recycling, and all of the other costs that now are paid for out of general funds. We essentially use a big chunk of our income tax dollars (and product purchase revenues) to keep those SUVs on the road.

+1!!! there is a lot positive in this. That encourages us to drive less and use public transport, do co-conveyance, and buy decent cars (not f*cking hummers).
But well... it still frustrating to pay a lot to drive heh...
 
KekChoz said:
+1!!! there is a lot positive in this. That encourages us to drive less and use public transport, do co-conveyance, and buy decent cars (not f*cking hummers).
But well... it still frustrating to pay a lot to drive heh...
I would love to use public transportation to get to work. But unfortunately. Public transportation in Miami is pretty much the worst. Unless you work in downtown. So you actaully need a car in to survive here.

My friend lived in Boston for 7 years. She never needed a car there. She saved a lot of money.