I love the G&L eye-gouger headstock. And I like this Tyler-looking LEH one too!Go ask G&L about that one.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I love the G&L eye-gouger headstock. And I like this Tyler-looking LEH one too!Go ask G&L about that one.
Good! I don't have a strong opinion either way, but a lot of folks do. What I will say is that basses from both brands appear to be of high quality (on average) and sound great (on average). But...as we all know, many a great bass was passed over due to one's emotional reaction to the headstock shape. Not fair or just, in any way, but just the way it goes. I enjoyed Lobster's review of a bass brand that I knew very little about prior to the video post (mission accomplished?).I love the G&L eye-gouger headstock. And I like this Tyler-looking LEH one too!
There are no dead spots and they attribute that to the size of the head stock. They've grown on me. Very well balanced instruments.Been very interested in the LEH offerings. I'd be willing to overlook the headstock, but the price is above my interest level. Cool build and great to hear a demo.
There are no dead spots and they attribute that to the size of the head stock. They've grown on me. Very well balanced instruments.
As is often case, that which is sensible is not sexy.
Let me play a few - I'll find the dead spots.There are no dead spots and they attribute that to the size of the head stock. They've grown on me. Very well balanced instruments.
HA! I own two. I thoroughly checked. All Set.Let me play a few - I'll find the dead spots.![]()
Roger wants it that way. He's willing to die on this hill. At 43 seconds he explains it in a way that isn't convincing but his name is on more headstocks than mine is. He blames Fender for doing it backwards