• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

LAKLAND OWNERS GROUP #30

Status
Not open for further replies.
so....lessee - if you were not married with Child, I would say the girl's impression would be most important......but now????? who knows! sound vs. looks???? I take sound every time but looks are a nice adder.....there is a lady at church that says my ice blue JO5CS is a "very petty bass".....

I would agree....but it also sounds phenominal!

maybe radioactive oatmeal needs to become REALLY radioactive (i.e CS'd???):ninja::hiding::D

LOL, don't get me wrong, RO sounds great, but that P sound is what I've been looking for all these years....
 
yeh - or at least we THINK we're cool.....here are afew shots from 1982ish when I THOUGHT I was cool.....ready with the milk Randy??

dk-firstbass-1.jpg


here we are "coordinating" our moves:

dk-firstbass-3.jpg

AWESOMENESS!!!!!!!
 
Like sleek vs. tricked out......

nice cowl cover vs. no hood....

I like both looks....just different...I agree that the DS's look more "gutsy" but I kinda like the smoothness look and raunchy sound of the CHIs.....

PS - I like the DS sound as well....again - just "different" than a CHI....
It is kind of funny how the Chis look smooth and the DS raw, but their tonal qualities are somewhat reversed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.