• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Lakland Owners Group #69

I agree 100%. I currently have an Audere on my JO5, but it came to me with a J-Retro. I too worry about not having the passive option but the battery seems to last forever. And it does have the little LED that shows battery status when you plug it in: Audere Audio Preamp Low Battery Indicator

Agree with this. I have an Audere on my DJ4 and the battery lasts a while. The battery LED is helpful in determining if you need to change out. Granted my DJ4 had a battery compartment installed in the back so battery changes are very easy/quick. But a great sounding and flexible preamp for what it's worth. Mine is a 4-band with a passive tone control.
 
Come to papa
IMG_6901.jpeg
 
Well, we got it home, very quick inspection and quicker relief and string height adjustments to see where I am starting and things look good. Frets show some but minimal wear, so I will do some play testing and some closer inspection then get on with some serious cleaning and lubing, and some light restoration and polishing. I was able to get a full, apparently never installed, set of genuine USA Lakland/Hanson PJ pickups that are exactly what I was looking for. A fantastic find for this one.

IMG_6899-50.jpg


IMG_6900-50.jpg


Hanson PJ Set no covers.jpg
 
Well, we got it home, very quick inspection and quicker relief and string height adjustments to see where I am starting and things look good. Frets show some but minimal wear, so I will do some play testing and some closer inspection then get on with some serious cleaning and lubing, and some light restoration and polishing. I was able to get a full, apparently never installed, set of genuine USA Lakland/Hanson PJ pickups that are exactly what I was looking for. A fantastic find for this one.

View attachment 7110478

View attachment 7110479

View attachment 7110481
Congrats!
I have to say I'm a bit jealous! ;)
 
Well, we got it home, very quick inspection and quicker relief and string height adjustments to see where I am starting and things look good. Frets show some but minimal wear, so I will do some play testing and some closer inspection then get on with some serious cleaning and lubing, and some light restoration and polishing. I was able to get a full, apparently never installed, set of genuine USA Lakland/Hanson PJ pickups that are exactly what I was looking for. A fantastic find for this one.

View attachment 7110478

View attachment 7110479

View attachment 7110481
My dream bass right there! 🤩 55-64. Congratulations on this one, you don't see them very often.
 
As I go through this one, cleaning, tweaking in my attempt to return it to as nice a condition as possible I thought it would be fun to share that process here because we all love pics and stuff. If at any point you get like "oh geez, not this guy with this thing again..." just say the word and I will cut back on everything except the things that vex me. But, this one has me excited and I am enjoying the ride. And remember, it's all your faults for lighting this fuse so you'll now have to endure my endless babbling about it. :laugh:

With that, I have started the testing and disassembly portion of the process. Most importantly the truss rod works as it should and it too all adjustments beautifully. And the playability is very good so that tells me the neck should have no issues. Two big hurdles cleared for me as I have had surprises in the past.

It looks like the EMG's that were in there were indeed a 4 string set, at least the P side of things. And, whoever installed them and did the setup should really pack up their tools and move to a new hobby. If they're calling themselves a tech and charging folks that is a crime. Wiring was a mess, and the setup was just so wrong. Thankfully I have corrected the set up and the electronics have been gutted so that is all in the rearview.

I do enjoy the questions that older guitars present but too often without satisfactory answers. In this case it had one of the most sticky and unexplainable schmutz under the pickguard. What was it and how did that much sticky liquid get into that tiny gap and then distribute itself nearly 100% across the pickguard area, you not pool into the P pickup rout? It was borderline disgusting and about had the PG glued to the body. Thinking that the event that caused that mess must have been interesting. PG and body cleaned up nicely though.
IMG_6919.jpg


I also decided to remove the neck inlay stickers. Had they been real I would have loved them, but stickers, not so much. My greatest concern was if there would be any fretboard ghosting or discoloration where the blocks were vs. the surrounding areas because of the time they had been on there, the way that body paint will fade or yellow with time while remaining the original color underneath the PG, like my current white DJ5 has done. But happy to report that, with some careful effort and cleanup, they were removed without incident with no signs of any fretboard variations. And that appeared to uncover some very nice birdseye maple position markers (that's my guess anyway). I think now that it would have been a shame to have left those hidden.
IMG_6909.jpg


IMG_6910.jpg


A little builders note left in the P pocket:
IMG_6911.jpg


Frets are interesting. They show very little signs of wear which would be unusual for a 15 year old bass, especially when most other things would indicate some age appropriate, but well cared for use. So my first though was that it likely had a level and crown at some point that would explain their current state. But after taking some measurements and doing some quick research that may not be the case. I don't know what size fret wire is, or would have been used, on these USA models. One old post I found showed an option of '.041 x .085' frets. And I know these are smallish compared to a lot of basses, but these actually consistently measure at .0455 x .0845 so if the first info is correct then these would be hardly worn at all. And I don't see any obvious signs of a refret so that's more positive news.

Next up will be body and PG buffing polishing. The body will require far less that I expected,

The PG is a consumable I know and can be replaced. But since it's original I will take a crack at restoring it as much as possible and I think it will be just fine. The only nitpicky area that get in my head are these seeming delaminations around a few screw holes. Probably from overtightening. Not sure what I can do about that. I may try wicking a bit of thin CA glue into those spaces to see if I can make them visualy disappear I have seen that done with a similar condition around finish lifting around fret ends.

IMG_6921.jpg
IMG_6922.jpg


And, that's all for my Day 1 adventures.
 
Nice work and Thank you for sharing the journey. I'm definitely subscribed.

That fretboard is absolutely gorgeous
Thank you and agreed, that is some fine looking rosewood! I was almost hoping that it did need a refret to have the opportunity to do a nice light full length sanding on the board itself to bring that up even more. But it'll have to do...