• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Lakland Owners Group #69

Really? It appeared in an article in the german Bass magazine a few years back, and there's no mention of it being used on the website...
And the price is preposterous, frankly. I tried to order a Lakland through them a while back and they just blew me off, so I went to one of their main rivals. Ha.
Who sent me the wrong bass, but I have never read a more apologetic email than the one they sent me after I told them. Also getting a biiiig discount on the right Lakland when it arrives in March. First production run of 55-02s in 2019, apparently.

yippee!

Peace,
SoundSupport

I'm glad things are working out.

I may be wrong....I know one like that was one of the first 44-07s manufactured.

Not many out there
 
Hey guys! So years ago Jeannie's used to make various pickguards for 44-01 basses. One was the standard one, one was a Musicman oval and another was jazz like. The jazz like one was like the standard but extended onto the lower horn. I don't think you can order these anymore but I would like to get one of that style. Does anyone here own one of those pickguards that could do a tracing for me? That way I could get it done anywhere.
 
To expand on my previous message about being sent the wrong bass...
I ordered a honeyburst 55-02 fretless, they sent a standard 55-02 by mistake.
Photo in the latest B-stock email from Lakland? 55-02 honeyburst.
I don't know if it's the same one that ended up in Germany by mistake, but if it is, it's flawless. I played it for about 30 seconds, not plugged in. Unless she's been damaged in the post going back to chicago, it's a new instrument.
Hope she goes to a good home!

Peace, SoundSupport
 
Nice work, but I can't help but wonder why he would take a relatively uncommon bass, and convert it to one of their most common ones? Perhaps I'm missing something?
It’s different in that it’s a 4-76 w/ a neck J added. A 4-94 has the MM pickup shifted toward the bridge.

I’m a 4-76 and Stingray fan, and I’m not that fond of a 4-94 with the MM pickup solo’d. It just doesn’t sound like a Stingray to me. He says that he can still get the Stingray sound. So, I dig it.
 
1LaklandTop.jpg

2LaklandBack.jpg

Coming up on three years with #263, so thought I should check in. This is a truly wonderful bass. The neck is more 'alive' than any bass I've ever played, plus it's got the perfect total feel. Great weight and balance, nice low-key bling. The Drop-D is sweet. I just love this instrument, I rarely play any of my others. So, cheers!
 
View attachment 3333542
View attachment 3333543
Coming up on three years with #263, so thought I should check in. This is a truly wonderful bass. The neck is more 'alive' than any bass I've ever played, plus it's got the perfect total feel. Great weight and balance, nice low-key bling. The Drop-D is sweet. I just love this instrument, I rarely play any of my others. So, cheers!
I love the color
 
  • Like
Reactions: basspraiser
Nice work, but I can't help but wonder why he would take a relatively uncommon bass, and convert it to one of their most common ones? Perhaps I'm missing something?

He said in the post he hates the MM sound, so he modified it. I agree with you though, this was a rare bass that he converted to run of the mill - as far as Lakland is concerned.