TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I'm still not 100% sold on the 44-02. As I said, it's the first bass I pick up, but I am not sure if it's because I really do like it, or if I am trying to convince myself I like it. If that makes sense. I do love the single volume and blend knobs. Those are super convenient and it is definitely a punchier tone. The 44-02 is also a pound lighter than the DJ-4 and I appreciate that. It's also the first active bass I have owned and there are definitely advantages to the active set up. I also found that I prefer the 44-02 at home and for recording, but the DJ-4 when jamming with friends. I think it's the simplicity of the plug and play of a passive bass. And it looks cooler.
The DJ-4 has sentimental value to it (my first Lakland and modeled after Adam Clayton's DJ-4) and I couldn't consider selling it. But, if I were to have only one bass, I think it would be the 44-02. If anyone has had similar experiences, please share.
Are the 44–01 and the 44-02 the exact same bass with different pick up routes?I too have a heavily modded 44-01. Pre and pups. Totally different than 44-02 or a J. That being said, I can get very J like tones because of the Big Singles and 4 band pre. For true J tones I grab my J. I still have my plans for a specific 44-02 because of it’s versatility. I’m sure it will be the one I pick up the most when I’m done modding it. 44-02 has the neck and body shape I like the most.
Are the 44–01 and the 44-02 the exact same bass with different pick up routes?
Moving the truss access to the headstock was smart. It’s a design improvement. With less than an inch between the neck heel and the pickup route, putting a truss access there weakened the wood too much.Why did Lakland move to the headstock truss access on the Skyline Decade? I assume it’s related to cost savings but the Lakland headstock doesn't look right with it.
US Decade (trans-orange) vs Skyline (white). See the difference?They still do it on the USA ones.
US Decade (trans-orange) vs Skyline (white). See the difference?
Its hard to tell on the image of the orange one because its blurry but yeah the pickup looks further back and it has a full truss route. What I am familiar with is the pickup moved toward the neck with the music man style truss wheel (as shown below). I haven't seen other photos that look like that orange one. From what I remember both the USA and Skyline used the truss rod wheel and then at some point the Skyline moved to a headstock access. If they moved the pickup toward the bridge on the USA line that is something I was unaware of. I would still be curious why they wouldn't modify the Skyline to be the same as the USA model. Its getting weirder. haha
There had been some cases of the wood busting from nothing more than minor headstock bumps. So, they moved the US Decade’s pickup back some, and have now changed the truss access to headstock on the Skyline. Smart design changes to remedy a problem. Can’t fault Lākland for that.Its hard to tell on the image of the orange one because its blurry but yeah the pickup looks further back and it has a full truss route. What I am familiar with is the pickup moved toward the neck with the music man style truss wheel (as shown below). I haven't seen other photos that look like that orange one. From what I remember both the USA and Skyline used the truss rod wheel and then at some point the Skyline moved to a headstock access. If they moved the pickup toward the bridge on the USA line that is something I was unaware of. I would still be curious why they wouldn't modify the Skyline to be the same as the USA model. Its getting weirder. haha
![]()
This is what is on the Lakland website right now:
![]()
There had been some cases of the wood busting from nothing more than minor headstock bumps. So, they moved the US Decade’s pickup back some, and have now changed the truss access to headstock on the Skyline. Smart design changes to remedy a problem. Can’t fault Lākland for that.
Seen it and discussed it with them.I'm not faulting them (except maybe for having outdated information on their website) BUT I think moving a pickup which is a major tonal change is an odd choice. What's odder is that they didn't solve the problem in the same way for both the USA and Skyline basses. Anyway my opinion is that the truss rod access on a Lakland headstock looks terrible and they should have avoided it (like they did on the USA line).
Side note: I have never heard of anyone having a decade damaged in that way.