• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Modulus Mob

Don't know if this is the right place to post this, but the last show I played it was pretty dark on stage, and I missed a couple frets a handful of times on my modulus - thought it could be a good idea to put some sort of glow in the dark where the dots are on the side of my fretboard... any thoughts on that? i.e. the safest option for the phenolic fingerboard (even though its just the side / no dots on face of fingerboard)

On an unrelated note - I'm not sure if my modulus is messing up some of my effects. I use an auto wah and a Boss OC-2 pedal, and when strings are struck with somewhat of a force, it sounds like it is about to blow the speaker or something. I know the signal is super hot, and I love my modulus for that, but I am afraid it is "too" hot for some effects pedals. Any experience? maybe a compressor first in the chain?

Thank you for reading

Regarding fret marker visibility, your best bet for a simple fix with good results is ... FretFX ... Attachable Illuminated LED Fret Markers .

You can get glow-in-the-dark paint or stickers, but the problem there is that the "active ingredient" in these kinds of things is phosphor. To get a good, bright, long-lasting glow, the phosphor needs to be kinda thick. At least 3mm. You could put some dots of phosphorescent paint on top of your existing side markers, but they won't be very bright or last very long. Same thing with the stickers.

You can search talkbass for this kind of thing and you'll see plenty of people who have tried stickers, or one or two coats of phosphorescent paint on top of dots, and they all end up reporting that it's really not helpful at all, not even worth the effort.

I've got a Warmoth necked bass that I built about 25 years ago; I drilled the side markers out about 4-5mm deep and filled the holes with phosphorescent paint, and it works really well. The dots will "charge" with just a little time in typical room lighting and will glow brightly enough to be clearly seen in dim lighting for well over an hour.

Also, phosphorescent paint is very flat, not glossy at all, and not terribly durable. If you don't put a topcoat of clear on it, it will get dirty very quickly, and it will wear very quickly. So, yeah, topcoating with some kind of clear is kinda mandatory.

So if you're up for that type of thing - taking out 3-4mm of your existing side dots and filling with phosphorescent paint, then a topcoat of clear - it will work well. Assuming you've already got the tools - a drill press and drill bits - it'll only cost a few dollars.

Also...., you could get some Luminlay to replace your existing side markers, or have a luthier do it for you.
 
Last edited:
Don't know if this is the right place to post this, but the last show I played it was pretty dark on stage, and I missed a couple frets a handful of times on my modulus - thought it could be a good idea to put some sort of glow in the dark where the dots are on the side of my fretboard... any thoughts on that? i.e. the safest option for the phenolic fingerboard (even though its just the side / no dots on face of fingerboard)

On an unrelated note - I'm not sure if my modulus is messing up some of my effects. I use an auto wah and a Boss OC-2 pedal, and when strings are struck with somewhat of a force, it sounds like it is about to blow the speaker or something. I know the signal is super hot, and I love my modulus for that, but I am afraid it is "too" hot for some effects pedals. Any experience? maybe a compressor first in the chain?

Thank you for reading
Oh, and regarding your high output level - you might try lowering your pickups a bit first.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ballin'bass
I have only one knob for my pick ups/volume, and I guess I could lower that a bit, but I would be afraid that it takes away some of the umph/character it gives at full signal.... thanks for both responses though!
I meant lowering the height of your pickups so that they're a little further away from your strings. That'll bring the overall volume down a bit.
 
So, I removed the EMG BQC system from my Quantum 5 and installed a Nordstrand 3B preamp.
I did not like the frequencies on the BQC, the mid sweep is something that I really do not like. I'm used to the Nordstrand preamp sound on my other bass.

Observations:
Had to use a EMG volume/tone pot and EMG Blend pot.
With the Nordstrand preamp, insertion loss is more prominent that with the BQC System when panning pickups.
I'm more happy with the Nordstrand EQ range, especially the mids, than with the BQC, but wells that is just me, I like the sound of the Nordstrand preamp.

My pickups are EMG 40CS, I'm still not really convinced I like that sound but is not something that I do not like either. In the future I might switch them by Nordstrand BigRig or Nordstrand Dual Blade 5, can't decide yet.

The default capacitor on the volume/tone EMG pot is not something that I like, I guess I will need to figure out how to bypass that default capacitor and add one of my own caps. But is not something urgent.

*Note: I was checking the BQC system that I removed from the Modulus Quantum 5, this is 1999 soldered version. It has a 50k volume pot and a regular 25k passive blend. I see the new BQC solderless system already include the ABC Blend. The master volume is not the new one with a board but a regular 50k volume.

Larry
 
Last edited:
1995 Modulus Quantum Bass Q6 Green Blue Burst 6 String Bass

Okay... Posted about this a couple weeks ago. Paid $1850, out the door. I have a week before I can no longer get a refund, and I need some opinion on if I should keep this. It has these issues:

1) Ad said it had a truss rod. There is NO truss rod...
2) Ad said 3-band preamp. The pick-up/preamp is a 2 band EQ, with Volume and Blend knobs, not a 3-band
3) Ad said Hipshot bridge. The bridge is not a Hipshot bridge.
4) There is crackling when I turn any of the knobs
5) The bridge height is pert-near maxed out on the low B and E strings

Other than that... It plays really nice. The action is perfect all across the board - LOW, no deadspots, and the only fret buzz I get is on the low B with very hard attack. It would seem to be in really good condition, especially for its age. Just typical wear and tear. Not even any buckle rash.

What I am really worried about is how much life does the neck/fretboard have left? Should I assume that since it isn't buzzing, it's okay and as long as I care for it, it will continue to be okay? Or should the height of the bridge on the E and B strings concern me? especially with no truss rod?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Ballin'bass
1995 Modulus Quantum Bass Q6 Green Blue Burst 6 String Bass

Okay... Posted about this a couple weeks ago. Paid $1850, out the door. I have a week before I can no longer get a refund, and I need some opinion on if I should keep this. It has these issues:

1) Ad said it had a truss rod. There is NO truss rod...
No Modulus has a truss rod. "newer" Mods have a relief system that people sometimes confuse with a truss rod. Ad states "Bi-directional relief adjusting truss rod" - they should have left "truss" out of the description. Actually they should have left the whole line out as it didn't exist in 95...

2) Ad said 3-band preamp. The pick-up/preamp is a 2 band EQ, with Volume and Blend knobs, not a 3-band
3) Ad said Hipshot bridge. The bridge is not a Hipshot bridge.
These are likely because of an inattentive seller. Saw four knobs, assumed 3-band eq and guessing on the bridge.

4) There is crackling when I turn any of the knobs
Likely needs to be cleaned, it is a 95 who knows how many times, if any, it's been cleaned in there.

5) The bridge height is pert-near maxed out on the low B and E strings
That does concern me. It shouldn't have to be maxed out.

The seller didn't put any time into researching what they had as parts look to be lifted from descriptions of newer Quantums. Bad seller with poor information - definitely but all in all I'd say keep it. Invest in a new bridge and preamp (least I would) but even with the bridge concern you say it plays well and finish still in good shape too. I always assume some work will come with a new purchase and the pots needing cleaning is very minor.
 
No Modulus has a truss rod. "newer" Mods have a relief system that people sometimes confuse with a truss rod. Ad states "Bi-directional relief adjusting truss rod" - they should have left "truss" out of the description. Actually they should have left the whole line out as it didn't exist in 95...


These are likely because of an inattentive seller. Saw four knobs, assumed 3-band eq and guessing on the bridge.


Likely needs to be cleaned, it is a 95 who knows how many times, if any, it's been cleaned in there.


That does concern me. It shouldn't have to be maxed out.

The seller didn't put any time into researching what they had as parts look to be lifted from descriptions of newer Quantums. Bad seller with poor information - definitely but all in all I'd say keep it. Invest in a new bridge and preamp (least I would) but even with the bridge concern you say it plays well and finish still in good shape too. I always assume some work will come with a new purchase and the pots needing cleaning is very minor.
Total semantics on the truss rod comment
 
  • Like
Reactions: iriegnome
No Modulus has a truss rod. "newer" Mods have a relief system that people sometimes confuse with a truss rod. Ad states "Bi-directional relief adjusting truss rod" - they should have left "truss" out of the description. Actually they should have left the whole line out as it didn't exist in 95...


These are likely because of an inattentive seller. Saw four knobs, assumed 3-band eq and guessing on the bridge.


Likely needs to be cleaned, it is a 95 who knows how many times, if any, it's been cleaned in there.


That does concern me. It shouldn't have to be maxed out.

The seller didn't put any time into researching what they had as parts look to be lifted from descriptions of newer Quantums. Bad seller with poor information - definitely but all in all I'd say keep it. Invest in a new bridge and preamp (least I would) but even with the bridge concern you say it plays well and finish still in good shape too. I always assume some work will come with a new purchase and the pots needing cleaning is very minor.

Thanks! I got the feeling the seller just lifted the description off the current website. It did come with another preamp, but it is the same kind. There are some upgrades I'd like to do. Any suggestions for passive/active combo humbucks that would fit, and a 3 band preamp with sweepable mids?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ballin'bass
Thanks! I got the feeling the seller just lifted the description off the current website. It did come with another preamp, but it is the same kind. There are some upgrades I'd like to do. Any suggestions for passive/active combo humbucks that would fit, and a 3 band preamp with sweepable mids?

I see the preamp on the picture that was removed, seems to be an EMG BQC system like the one it came on my Q5 which is bass/treble stack and Mid/Sweep stack. I guess that fits the 3band you are looking for. And it already have the EMG pickups is just a matter to re-wire it.

Invalid Link Removed

Old ones did not have quick connect but the connections are easy to figure out.

Larry
 
Heya ModulusFriends... I heart my 2009 Flea 4-string, but it's heavy -- weighs in at 9.8 lbs! Are there any Moduli 4s that are lighter? I see Mr. G. Gould has some 4-string that about 2-lbs lighter... anyone thumped one of those? Thx!
 
Heya ModulusFriends... I heart my 2009 Flea 4-string, but it's heavy -- weighs in at 9.8 lbs! Are there any Moduli 4s that are lighter? I see Mr. G. Gould has some 4-string that about 2-lbs lighter... anyone thumped one of those? Thx!
Hi,
Yes there are many mods that's are lighter. Just have to search. I had a flea that was just a touch over 8lbs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bioflava
My Franken VJ is my lightest bass, weighing in at 7.5 lbs.

%2F%2Fi180.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fx258%2Fsilentivan42%2FBasses%2F20140608_102153_zps76f286b6.png
 
Last edited:
Heya ModulusFriends... I heart my 2009 Flea 4-string, but it's heavy -- weighs in at 9.8 lbs! Are there any Moduli 4s that are lighter? I see Mr. G. Gould has some 4-string that about 2-lbs lighter... anyone thumped one of those? Thx!
That's not terrible. A lot of these basses were made before weight was as big a concern. My Q5 is like 9.5lbs, but it balances well and I have gotoh res-o-lite tuners and use a neoprene strap, so it's comfortable for a few hours of standing and playing.