TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Gosh, you're right. Perhaps the thru-neckers had noted its absence, held that note, and wanted to sustain it longer? I've also noticed here that mahogany-body owners have warmed to this thread more than maple-fretboard owners (although they've been the brightest comments), basswood types' egos have been easily dented, especially when attacked by plectrum users and the SVT owners philosophising has been pretty heavy. Has anyone done nickels versus... or would that be dull?
OK, cease and desist. I hear you.
thanks for the tip.P basses sound bad.
Rolling papers it isThat's simple. Neither.
Nope. Unimpaired it isRolling papers it is
But how can we be sure?
Any bass that needs tort and flats to be good is no good.And you NEED tort and flats. There is no other way!!!!

...rich, deep, thump and the complex midrange capped with an elegant treble response... reminding everyone that we're not all that different after all....![]()
Jeff Berlin VS metronomes.
That is a great idea!.Let's start a thread and put up a poll...
Asking weight vs actually buying anything......ever.
Unimpaired
Enhancement? Negative, Ghost Rider.Enhancement, not impairment. You're not doing it right.
My god... what have I created... Also can't believe I forgot tonewood, I guess me forgetting tonewood is the most divisive. I will go buy a new bass in penance.
If he was doing it right his avatar might look like this. Just messing with ya Sixgunn, to each their own as they say. Whoever "they" are.Enhancement, not impairment. You're not doing it right.
that's what i was thinking, too, but i wasn't sure. thanks for the tip!Any bass that needs tort and flats to be good is no good.
that's what i was thinking, too, but i wasn't sure. thanks for the tip!![]()
Negative, Ghost Rider.