![]()
I couldn't find any "We love the funk-brothers" pictures...
Which is why Al Slutsky was inspired to write the book "Standing in the Shadows of Motown," and then to produce the movie. Shame on us!
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
![]()
I couldn't find any "We love the funk-brothers" pictures...
There's always a hater in threads such as this who cites "I Want To Hold Your Hand" as their Case Closed evidence of the band's irrelevance to music & music history. When I read that I don't know if I'm being trolled, or if they are really so, well, um, let's be kind and say "uninformed", that they believe what they say.
"I Want To Hold Your Hand" was so different sounding, when it came out, it made me wonder what those special sounds were. That is when I discovered bass. Structurally, and chord wise, I think it is brilliant to this day. Years after it's release and the Beatles, a then rather cynical and jaded, John Lennon heard it on the radio, while being filmed, and commentated that it was a good tune.
He's a jazz guy (pro dummer) and he doesn't like him or the Beatles at all. Always discredits their efforts as derivative of Motown, says they had ghost writers, and session guys playing their parts, and so on.
Meanwhile I'm rocking out on "Rain", thinking you just have to think the rhythm section in this is brilliant and he doesn't care
Is it a jazz guy thing not to care about the Beatles? I mean, jazz is inundated with a amazing musicians. I can see why he wouldn't care too much for pop music, but he seems to like most other things.
It's not that I don't like the Beatles, ... they have never really made any impact on me musically. Kind of just background music.
It's not that I don't like the Beatles, it's just that there's a whole world of music out there that I find waaay more satisfying. I have absolutely nothing against them and own a couple albums, but I wouldn't exactly rush out to replace them if they were lost. Funny enough and in truth, if there were one thing I could say I definitely didn't like about them, it would be Paul's hokey vaudevillian songwriting and vocals. I respect them for their career and influence, I just don't care about them and they have never really made any impact on me musically. Kind of just background music.
Have you researched your heroes influences? You just might be surprised the affect the Beatles had on them.
Yes, sometimes to obnoxious detail. The Beatles would probably credit some of them as influences, just as some would credit the Beatles. As I said, I respect their influence, I just don't find their music as pleasing. They certainly deserve credit, but they aren't any more prolific than many other artists before and after that get not even half the credit they do. It's not something I really like to get into because I know that the Beatles are near and dear to many peoples hearts, but that doesn't reflect my opinion of them. For the record, I much prefer George Harrison and Lennon's solo work to pretty much anything they ever did as a group.
Any lineage in my personal sphere of influences remains unbroken and largely uninhabited by the Beatles.
So you are influenced by the Beatles.
Highly unlikely, in 2014.
Or we could get into a philosophical debate about the minutiae of influence and how the beginning of mankind as we know it can eventually be traced back to the Beatles.
Your argument, if I read it correctly, basically states that if it weren't for the Beatles, the artists I draw influence from wouldn't have come to be, right?
I think it's very easy for someone to sit there and say "I can trace the moment I decided to pick up a bass to X" while overlooking the larger forces at play that would make them the player they would eventually become. I'm trying to parse your point from the quotes you used and get beyond the sarcasm, so maybe you can help me out a bit if I missed anything.
Say, what?
Nope.
Simply put: It HIGHLY likely that all of your influences, that came AFTER the Beatles, were indeed influenced by them - either first generation, of subsequent generations - and therefore have left a bit of Beatles-DNA on you. It's inescapable.
Try as you might to deny it, if you are playing Western Music, you have either directly or indirectly been influenced - bad or good - by the Beatles.
Sorry, dude. They've apparently crept under your skin.
Well you might want to go ask Miles Davis and Willie Dixon if they traced their influences correctly, because the last time I checked they both played native western forms that pre dated your precious Beatles by many a twinkle in the eye.
You need to reread my post.
By the way, they aren't my "precious Beatles". Twinkle, twinkle.