I would agree. lol I'm not a fan of the American standard line, for that reason.I played a bass at GC the other day that fit that description.
It was a Fender American Standard.![]()
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I would agree. lol I'm not a fan of the American standard line, for that reason.I played a bass at GC the other day that fit that description.
It was a Fender American Standard.![]()
I do not think anyone is doubting the build quality.
It is the price!
There are plenty of great basses made in Korea. But look at their price.
The new PRS SE series looks great and PRS quality is well known.
The SE Kestrel has a msrp of under $800.00
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
Hipshot tuners and bridge, string through or not,bound neck.
If he priced his bass in the $700-900 range I do not think anyone would be complaining.
I do not think anyone is doubting the build quality.
It is the price!
There are plenty of great basses made in Korea. But look at their price.
The new PRS SE series looks great and PRS quality is well known.
The SE Kestrel has a msrp of under $800.00
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
Hipshot tuners and bridge, string through or not,bound neck.
If he priced his bass in the $700-900 range I do not think anyone would be complaining.
In-n-Out is a decent burger, but way overpriced for what you get. Hype and perceived exclusivity drive that brand, as well as many instrument makers/marketers..
All else being equal, if my money can help a guy (say, a guitar factory worker) in California put food on his table versus helping a guy in Asia, I will choose to help the guy in California. It's better for him and it's indirectly better for me. Not having a trade deficit is (or would be) good for the whole U.S..
Haha, really? You left out the half of my post, where I provided the basis for my opinion. Meanwhile, your post provided no context--and yet you're apparently convinced it's fact. (It ain't, unless you've personally weighed all G&Ls for the last 20 years.) Accountability, indeed.
Here are the recent words of a G&L dealer with a TB forum. They certainly support the notion that weight continues to be an issue for G&L.
Additionally, I don't think I have to weigh "every G&L ever built" to have a solid grasp of the weights. I've weighed all my gear for the last 10+ years, on a proper shipping scale. Having owned 60+ G&L basses over the last few years, I'm at least not talking outta my azz here. Never had an alder body G&L 4 string weigh in at 9.5 lbs or greater. A couple at 9+, most at sub-9, and many at 8-8 1/2 lbs. Never had ANY G&L bass weigh over 10 1/2 lbs, not the vintage ones, nor the fivers.
.... You're a fantastic player (seen your YouTube videos) and now you gotta rub this in my face..... Yep, I hate you. ;-) .......Sorry, jealousy got the best of me.
Has anyone seen Ed Friedlands new P Bass Mashup video? He plays the Lakin and a bunch of other P's. For my tonal goals the Lakin just too big, loose & undefined. Maybe it was just his choice of strings but it was easily my least favorite of the bunch.
Still I'd like to try one. I love the idea of the wide 1.75" nut and 10" fingerboard radius (if that's what they are) on the Glaub.
Yeah sorry about that, still learning how to do all this on my phone. The first video is in the mix and the second is isolated bass. Use a good pair of headphones and you can really hear the differences...thru my Apple earbuds not so much.Thank you kind sir!
Any chance you could post a link?
People just are resistant to new things....or new takes on existing items I guess....The Fender '66 Jazz Bass (made overseas, NOT in U.S.) goes for $1149, and the bridge & tuners are not as goos as the D. Lakin's (USA Hipshot). When the '66 came out, people were not slingin' poop at Fender the way some have at D. Lakin's Basses here. What's up with that?
People just are resistant to new things....or new takes on existing items I guess....
What is it about Dan Lakin basses that brings every G&L and Carvin fan out of the woodwork?
It's a phenomenon.
If you're willing to shrug off weights provided by sellers ('cause yeah, of course they want to OVERstate the weightYou can't have it both ways. You can't have a strong opinion based on your "experience", then immediately state that you don't actually have any experience because you haven't "tried many G&L basses". Much less owned many (any?), and even further less, actually weighed any. You're completely out of your element on this one, perpetuating a myth by relying on hearsay on an internet forum.
Additionally, I don't think I have to weigh "every G&L ever built" to have a solid grasp of the weights. I've weighed all my gear for the last 10+ years, on a proper shipping scale. Having owned 60+ G&L basses over the last few years, I'm at least not talking outta my azz here. Never had an alder body G&L 4 string weigh in at 9.5 lbs or greater. A couple at 9+, most at sub-9, and many at 8-8 1/2 lbs. Never had ANY G&L bass weigh over 10 1/2 lbs, not the vintage ones, nor the fivers.
) and the statements of a dealer of G&Ls as "Internet hearsay", have fun with that.
If you're willing to shrug off weights provided by sellers ('cause yeah, of course they want to OVERstate the weight) and the statements of a dealer of G&Ls as "Internet hearsay", have fun with that.
I made nothing up. If you bothered to go back and read my first response to you, you'd see I was referring to "sellers" in the TB classifieds. And that "guy" I quoted is Greg from Rocket Music, a G&L dealer.Yeah right. Here are the dealers you're referring to. What weights? Just guys saying they request light weight basses from G&L, no mention of weights, or models, ash/alder bodies, fivers. And one guy saying "no more 12 pound basses in my store".
You're gonna have to show me a 12 pound G&L bass, because that's well into the extreme upper range of the old Peavey T-series basses or a Gibson RD or Les Paul. Extreme upper range, and most of those boat anchor Peavey T basses don't even weigh 12 pounds.
Here are the posters you quoted...
bhunt1 said: ↑
"Interesting. I think Greg usually orders G&Ls with the request for lighter weight, but it's luck of the draw what you actually get".
RocketMusic said: ↑
"And I do indeed typically request "Lightweight" when I order G&L's, unless the customer prefers otherwise. G&L makes no guarantees about hitting a specific weight range, but I like to think it helps..."
RocketMusic said: ↑
"I did recently notice that G&L has been including the weight of every bass on their "available list" now. That's a list of ready-to-ship instruments that gets emailed to dealers periodically. So I can now make an informed decision about which instruments to grab. I LOVE that, no more 12 pounders in my store! LOL"
So where are these "weights provided by dealers"? It occurs to me that it's futile having a discussion with someone who just makes things up. Fascinating, yet futile.