You're not doing it right:
This sucks - why can't people complain more?!?!?
Or for the more wordy side of the house:
Because many of the things I'm about to say regarding NAMM have already been beaten into the ground, I will try to keep this letter short. As this letter will make clear, NAMM finds it convenient to blame all of society's woes on noisome ratbags. Doing so fits with the rest of its populist sloganeering and takes less intellectual effort than investigating the structural factors and material practices that may in fact be the true reason that NAMM has never gotten ahead because of its hard work or innovative ideas. Rather, all of NAMM's successes are due to kickbacks, bribes, black market double-dealing, outright thuggery, and unsavory political intrigue. If NAMM is going to promote violence in all its forms—physical, sexual, psychological, economical, and social—then it should at least have the self-respect to remind itself of a few things: First, it is way ahead—if that's the right phrase—of most moralistic pamphleteers in embracing Titoism. And second, the problem with it is not that it's unforgiving. It's that it wants to feed us ever-larger doses of its lies and crackpot assumptions.
NAMM's prodigal machinations aren't something we can safely ignore. Nor should we merely disparage them wittily over martinis at cocktail parties. No, we must provide information and inspiration to as many people as possible. That's the only way to educate the public about how NAMM has been trying to popularize the narrative that it is beyond reproach. My fear is that if it's successful at promoting such cockamamy notions then even the man on the Clapham omnibus may agree to let it degrade, divide, and destroy our nation.
This hasn't sat well with rebarbative, lethargic sociopaths. So let NAMM call me unrealistic; I call it grumpy. It has been revealed that NAMM plans to make life less pleasant for us. First reaction yields that it's blind to the truth. A little more thought leads to the more accurate conclusion that NAMM refers to a variety of things using the word "unconstitutionality". Translating this bit of jargon into English isn't easy. Basically, it's saying that there should be publicly financed centers of hedonism, which we all know is patently absurd. At any rate, I am fully in accord with those who say that I find its reification of mysticism a tad disconcerting. How much more illumination does that fact need before NAMM can grasp it? Assuming the answer is "a substantial amount", let me point out that conclaves of NAMM's pickthanks have all the dissent found in a North Korean communist party meeting. That's why no one there will ever admit that NAMM's wishy-washy actions have created a class of dependent supplicants and special interests. Sadly, providing for their needs and wants is leading us towards economic sclerosis. All we can do now is challenge NAMM to defend its blandishments or else to change them. That's it for this letter. I sincerely hope that typing it was not a complete waste of energy. Unfortunately, I do realize that my words will probably trigger no useful response in the flabby synapses of NAMM's brain. I just felt obligated to go through the motions because NAMM's longiloquent words are based primarily on prejudice and paranoia.
