If the Wizzy 10 did exist, would it be a 4 ohm or 8 ohm? 4 ohms would be great b/c it could easily be paired with the regular Wizzy.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Freddels said:If the Wizzy 10 did exist, would it be a 4 ohm or 8 ohm? 4 ohms would be great b/c it could easily be paired with the regular Wizzy.
kaybass1952 said:8 ohms would be great b/c it could easily be paired with my Bag End 15 (8ohm) to run my ww at the recommended min. 4ohm load![]()
univac jr. said:My vote is for 4 Ohms as for reasons suggested by Freddels as well as it would pair nice with the forth coming EA micro.
(I can envision a 'Micro Wizzy Combo' and 'micro powered wizzy'.)
And I've personally always felt the my Focus is 'happiest' with a 4 Ohm load.
OK can we just split this thread from the "prototype probably not gonna happen CM 208 discussion" to start one on the "Hypothetical slightly more likely Wizzy 10"?
And if they do the wizzy 10 cab count me in. It sounds like what I am looking for.
David Santos said:It would be great to know the specifications for the prototype Wizzy 10...
David Santos
Bob Gollihur said:Your wish is my command (courtesy of John at EA)
Wizzy-110
Configuration: 1 x 10" Transmission Line
Woofer: Proprietary EA Neodymium 10"with Whizzer cone
Frequency Response: 45Hz to 5.5KHz
Sensitivity: 102dB @ 1m
Sound Pressure Level: 126dB @ 1m
Power Handling: 250 watts
Impedance: 4 ohm
Connection: Two Speakon combo connectors
Size: 15H x 12W x 11D
Weight: 18lbs
Handle: SideStrap Handle
interesting Ric;Ric Vice said:If you look at the specs for both cabinets the essential differences are that
the CM will handle @ twice the wattage and you could use two cabinets
without going below a 4ohm load, the question, at least in my mind is "can the EA micro run ata 2ohm load. All the specs that I've seen so far only have "4 0hm . If you could it would be really easy to add a second whizzy and still be under the 41 lbs of the CM208.
Ric
bolo said:Thanks Ric.
Actually, I have trouble judging what something is gonna sound like just looking at most all the specs you listed to be honest.
In my mind, the essential differences in these two cabs (that I've never heard) that stand out to me are:
(1) 8 inch drivers v. 10's
(2) M style transmission line vs. L style
And the Whizzer cone v. (what I think is a) "regular" tweeter I reckon - Although I'm delighted w/ my 12" Wizzer.![]()
I just think they would sound ... different. I belong to the camp where I don't mind the extra weight if I am really, really digging the sound.
I've been whining about that since this thread started. If they can do a limited run of the Wizzy M line and sell them out what makes them think they can't do the same with the Vl208? The M line Wizzy was a box hardly anyone had tried. At least the Vl 208 has a fan club.David Santos said:But you're probably right. EA would never consider reissueing the cabinet. Silly of me....
Right on the money so to speak. Good questions. Yes, how much are people willing to pay? And how many people?Uncletoad said:Perhaps the better question is how much is that cab worth to those that want them?
...
Can they make enough profit on the prices people are willing to pay to make it worth doing?
...
If they can't make any money than that's a whole nuther thing.
Uncletoad said:At least the Vl 208 has a fan club.