I love it. Only thing that would be better is a 4003S with this finish. And maybe plain inlays. But damn it's sexy!
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I am a Rick lover and this one is "meh". Maybe a matte finish in another color, the black looks dead. And I HATE the fret marker inlays.
I love it. Only thing that would be better is a 4003S with this finish. And maybe plain inlays. But damn it's sexy!
The killers for the look (to me) are the binding (makes it look too country and less metal). The non-black bridge bits. The gloss pick guard shouldn't be glossy. Black fin inlays would be sweet.
I know that this isn't a 'bash Rickenbacker" thread - and I own two of them. The question that I have is when has Rickenbacket actually listened to what their customers wanted and did something?
maybee with a high c but there were no b strings in the 60'sThere, reportedly, was at least one made in the '60s, IIRC.
i quite like that ! Is this one with the right way around headstock?It's Ok. I guess I'm biased to the 4001. Plus I like the chrome hardware and satin finish on this one, more. I found it for sale (sold) on this German site (more pics here) Invalid Link Removed
Rickenbacker 4001 C64S
View attachment 942402
View attachment 942403
View attachment 942404
i quite like that ! Is this one with the right way around headstock?