• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

New Rickenbacker Colors

Which color do you like best?

  • Pink

    Votes: 69 28.3%
  • Burst

    Votes: 96 39.3%
  • Butts

    Votes: 34 13.9%
  • Both are swell!

    Votes: 45 18.4%

  • Total voters
    244
I don't like sunburst on ricks usually but ebony and checkerboard binding do me in. If this had the red covering all that yellow in the middle, It would be perfect IMO. They could call it something snappy like two tone red burst. lol

Now if it were bright, non metallic pink, black hardware, ebony, checkerboard binding, it would be all over.

This pink is, unfortunately, more like a metallic rose color to me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: byoung93888
the finish means very little when it's been covered with a pickguard

sans p/g for me:

8-fullsize.jpg
I'm with you; I prefer my basses sans pick guard. I went to remove the pick guard from my early '70s 4001 when I bought it new only to find out the company had a really bizarre (and poorly-crafted) way of running wires that made it impossible to keep the PG off. As for colors? I'm color blind, so I usually go for natural finishes and various types of wood. The matter that really strikes me, however, is why on earth Ric would bother with different colors and finishes and leave the world's cheesiest bridge on it? The old Ric style bridge is an interesting looking piece of hardware, but it does its job so poorly it should have be relegated to the dust bin decades ago.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Killed_by_Death
The matter that really strikes me, however, is why on earth Ric would bother with different colors and finishes and leave the world's cheesiest bridge on it? The old Ric style bridge is an interesting looking piece of hardware, but it does its job so poorly it should have be relegated to the dust bin decades ago.

I'll never understand why people bitch about the intentionally retro-style hardware on the 4003 when the 4004 has existed for years and has the things they're asking for.
 
I like them both, though I'm not a fan of bursts on the Ric body shape usually.

I would like to see the blackout hardware, ebony board, and checkered binding on the pink body. I bet that would look sharp.

And as for those who don't like binding, RIC makes the 4004 and the S models. I like the binding with solid colors, and the checker binding is classy looking.
 
Asking because I don't know: has RIC ever done a 4001/3 OEM in a dark, manly purple? Or is midnight blue / azure as close ad they've come to it?

Probably the closest they came was the darker version of Burgundy. It was an overall translucent deep wine red. For a time in the early '70s, some were so dark they appeared nearly black. These have been dubbed "Eggplantglo" by enthusiasts.
 
I'll never understand why people bitch about the intentionally retro-style hardware on the 4003 when the 4004 has existed for years and has the things they're asking for.
This isn't random bitching about a retro-style component. I actually like the look of the original-style bridge; it is one of several defining features of a Ric. I still own and play the early '70s 4001 I mentioned in my original post. I'm wondering why Ric doesn't bother to make a bridge that looks like the one that came on my 4001 but actually functions properly. It can be done, but hasn't. The question is: why?
 
  • Like
Reactions: GregC