Asking because I don't know: has RIC ever done a 4001/3 OEM in a dark, manly purple? Or is midnight blue / azure as close ad they've come to it?
Blueburst that turned purple on a 4004
The Rickenbacker Club Part Twelve
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Asking because I don't know: has RIC ever done a 4001/3 OEM in a dark, manly purple? Or is midnight blue / azure as close ad they've come to it?
This isn't random bitching about a retro-style component. I actually like the look of the original-style bridge; it is one of several defining features of a Ric. I still own and play the early '70s 4001 I mentioned in my original post. I'm wondering why Ric doesn't bother to make a bridge that looks like the one that came on my 4001 but actually functions properly. It can be done, but hasn't. The question is: why?
Anybody who comes closer in look with a functional bridge will get sued by Ric, they tried that with Hipshot and lost.
This isn't random bitching about a retro-style component. I actually like the look of the original-style bridge; it is one of several defining features of a Ric. I still own and play the early '70s 4001 I mentioned in my original post. I'm wondering why Ric doesn't bother to make a bridge that looks like the one that came on my 4001 but actually functions properly. It can be done, but hasn't. The question is: why?
Way back in the day I had a 4001. I loved the tone, and the thin neck, but it was soooo heavy, and extremely headstock heavy. I actually had a callous at the base of my left index finger from holding it up. Even heavier after putting lead in the cavities in an attempt to balance it. Finally had to let it go, went with a nice light S. D. Curlee, double octave fret board, great tone.That pink is sweet. I could never own a Ric because I hate the way they feel but aesthetically I've always thought they looked badass.
There's the 75th anniversary DCM (dark cherry metallic) bass. It's got a purple-ish vibe, but is more maroon depending on where you draw the line between colours.Asking because I don't know: has RIC ever done a 4001/3 OEM in a dark, manly purple? Or is midnight blue / azure as close ad they've come to it?
Hey! That picture of the DCM is my bass and my photo. Send money to me!There's the 75th anniversary DCM (dark cherry metallic) bass. It's got a purple-ish vibe, but is more maroon depending on where you draw the line between colours.
![]()
And then there's plumglo:
![]()
Looks like the pink is a special run for Chicago Music Exchange.
The burst is a prototype.
Something more like this, perhaps?I'd really dig that new burst with the checker binding and the 60's style knobs if it didn't have that black hardware/fretboard. Those touches look awful IMO.
Neither does the Alembic bridge, but I have never heard anyone complain about that....has no individual saddle height adjustments...
If I remember correctly, you convert 4-string Rics to 5, yes? And if so, do you find yourself having to use 5-string bridges with narrower string spacing than, say, a bridge spaced for Fenders?
If I remember correctly, you convert 4-string Rics to 5, yes? And if so, do you find yourself having to use 5-string bridges with narrower string spacing than, say, a bridge spaced for Fenders?