• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Noble Amps Preamp

Where do you see that it is actually a couple of plugins that are activated? I just watched the Roots one and there is no mention of that. They said they used a UAD, but they didn't say they used plugins. Personally, I still hear the sound of the Noble in it. I use the same chain and again - a great recorded tone is the sum of it's parts.

Is there a specific video you can link that you are talking about?

That’s exactly the video I’m talking about. As are all the others on the channel. The amp and cab sim and the compression are clearly audible in all the videos, to the point where I could approximate the settings using plugins I have at my own home studio.

I do 99% of my playing / recording going direct into a DAW on studio headphones so my ears are fairly well tuned into this stuff, a dry direct signal does not sound like that. It’s a heavily processed signal, albeit done tastefully and with expertise: it’s not over-hyped and it sounds relatively natural, but it most certainly is processed. If anything it seems like the videos are a testament to the Apollo Mk 2 and the bundled plugins (which sound great) more than the Noble.

I would be interested in hearing those recordings without the Noble in the chain. If the bass is going straight into the Apollo, the Noble isn’t doing much more than adding a touch of EQ. The Ian Allison video is interesting - he even says something along the lines of not needing to use parametric eq’s because the Noble nails the important frequencies. He’s effectively using it as an EQ.

Again nothing wrong with any of that, but as a product demo it should be made clear, in the same way outboard gear is always mentioned. If you were buying a camera, and the demo shots were heavily processed in Photoshop to enhance their appearance, you’d want to know about it. Using Photoshop is a part of the process in everyday camera use, but in a marketing video which people use to evaluate the qualities of the camera, those enhancements could be construed as misleading.
 
That’s exactly the video I’m talking about. As are all the others on the channel. The amp and cab sim and the compression are clearly audible in all the videos, to the point where I could approximate the settings using plugins I have at my own home studio.

I do 99% of my playing / recording going direct into a DAW on studio headphones so my ears are fairly well tuned into this stuff, a dry direct signal does not sound like that. It’s a heavily processed signal, albeit done tastefully and with expertise: it’s not over-hyped and it sounds relatively natural, but it most certainly is processed. If anything it seems like the videos are a testament to the Apollo Mk 2 and the bundled plugins (which sound great) more than the Noble.

I would be interested in hearing those recordings without the Noble in the chain. If the bass is going straight into the Apollo, the Noble isn’t doing much more than adding a touch of EQ. The Ian Allison video is interesting - he even says something along the lines of not needing to use parametric eq’s because the Noble nails the important frequencies. He’s effectively using it as an EQ.

Again nothing wrong with any of that, but as a product demo it should be made clear, in the same way outboard gear is always mentioned. If you were buying a camera, and the demo shots were heavily processed in Photoshop to enhance their appearance, you’d want to know about it. Using Photoshop is a part of the process in everyday camera use, but in a marketing video which people use to evaluate the qualities of the camera, those enhancements could be construed as misleading.

I have the actual Apollo device - do you? Sounds like you are making some assumptions here. I think we all know what a dry, direct signal sounds like. I get paid to play on sessions, so you are not the only one here that listens in this environment.

You said it was heavily-processed and then in the next sentence you said "it’s not over-hyped and it sounds relatively natural". You are going back and forth here. Ill listen again in a different environment and try and hear what you are describing.

I don't think it is a heavily processed signal. I get a similar sound with a touch of the Preamp engaged and the 1176 taking off about 2 db. That's my chain. I'll bypass the Noble again and see how it sounds. I just will need to get the gain staging right so there is not a volume difference.

Again, the signal in the roots video is not heavily processed to my ears. I heard that video and was like "yeah, that's the sound". So I simply don't think you are correct there. He also is using flats on an active J bass, which is a rather bad ass tone. There is a poster in here who recorded his sadowsky into the Noble and posted it here You should listen to that. If you are just hearing an EQ boost, than this box probably is not for you anyway.

EDIT - ok, I am taking a break from working now and knee-deep in a tune so I can't crank out a demo at the moment, but I did do this : I copy/pasted my apollo settings to channel 1 which is the DI of the apollo and then I matched the gain staging. I set the Noble to flat with no EQ and alternated plugging into each input.

My Apollo settings is the preamp with a level boost to 5.5 and then I use the output knob to match the gain. My 1176 takes 1db off on average. It was taking off 1b on each signal once I matched the staging.

The tonal difference - the Noble is my preferred sound. It sounds a little fatter, warmer and adds the 3D tone via some extra harmonics. The Apollo only sound is quite nice, and probably fine to many people, but the Noble just takes it up a notch. You get a deeper and warmer sound. I can hear this pretty obviously through headphones.

If all the Noble did was just this, it would be a rad $300-400ish dollar tube pre because it definitely makes a difference to the sound. But then you add in the EQ, which is seriously killer (I don't boost mine too much - around 8 o clock on bass and 9 o clock on treble, but it works on both active or passive basses. It is exceptionally clean) Then you add in the fact that I have a pedal board powered by the device plus the extremely high quality of the build and that is why I think it is worth the money.Especially huge if you play sessions and also use in ears at live gigs. It really changes the game there.

Hopefully this helps and once things settle down I will be able to do a demo where people can hear the two tones and what the difference is. Both the Apollo and the Noble are incredibly good for what they do.When you combine them it is a dream tone - at least for me.
 
Last edited:
That’s exactly the video I’m talking about. As are all the others on the channel. The amp and cab sim and the compression are clearly audible in all the videos, to the point where I could approximate the settings using plugins I have at my own home studio.

I do 99% of my playing / recording going direct into a DAW on studio headphones so my ears are fairly well tuned into this stuff, a dry direct signal does not sound like that. It’s a heavily processed signal, albeit done tastefully and with expertise: it’s not over-hyped and it sounds relatively natural, but it most certainly is processed. If anything it seems like the videos are a testament to the Apollo Mk 2 and the bundled plugins (which sound great) more than the Noble.

I would be interested in hearing those recordings without the Noble in the chain. If the bass is going straight into the Apollo, the Noble isn’t doing much more than adding a touch of EQ. The Ian Allison video is interesting - he even says something along the lines of not needing to use parametric eq’s because the Noble nails the important frequencies. He’s effectively using it as an EQ.

Again nothing wrong with any of that, but as a product demo it should be made clear, in the same way outboard gear is always mentioned. If you were buying a camera, and the demo shots were heavily processed in Photoshop to enhance their appearance, you’d want to know about it. Using Photoshop is a part of the process in everyday camera use, but in a marketing video which people use to evaluate the qualities of the camera, those enhancements could be construed as misleading.

Oh top of being a working bass player, I am a working photographer. That’s a bad example. Most of those camera adverts contain fully processed video and stills.

I took a leap in on the Noble from all the great videos Jack and others have posted. There is nothing misleading at all. Go play through one. It’s not the flavor of the week. It’s the kind of gear that becomes part of the main course. It’s simple, but it takes my sound to a special place that even my multi thousand dollar amp setup can’t achive. And that sounds great as is. Go play one and let us know what you think!
 
I have the actual Apollo device - do you? Sounds like you are making some assumptions here. I think we all know what a dry, direct signal sounds like. I get paid to play on sessions, so you are not the only one here that listens in this environment.

You said it was heavily-processed and then in the next sentence you said "it’s not over-hyped and it sounds relatively natural". You are going back and forth here. Ill listen again in a different environment and try and hear what you are describing.

I don't think it is a heavily processed signal. I get a similar sound with a touch of the Preamp engaged and the 1176 taking off about 2 db. That's my chain. I'll bypass the Noble again and see how it sounds. I just will need to get the gain staging right so there is not a volume difference.

Again, the signal in the roots video is not heavily processed to my ears. I heard that video and was like "yeah, that's the sound". So I simply don't think you are correct there. He also is using flats on an active J bass, which is a rather bad ass tone. There is a poster in here who recorded his sadowsky into the Noble and posted it here You should listen to that. If you are just hearing an EQ boost, than this box probably is not for you anyway.

EDIT - ok, I am taking a break from working now and knee-deep in a tune so I can't crank out a demo at the moment, but I did do this : I copy/pasted my apollo settings to channel 1 which is the DI of the apollo and then I matched the gain staging. I set the Noble to flat with no EQ and alternated plugging into each input.

My Apollo settings is the preamp with a level boost to 5.5 and then I use the output knob to match the gain. My 1176 takes 1db off on average. It was taking off 1b on each signal once I matched the staging.

The tonal difference - the Noble is my preferred sound. It sounds a little fatter, warmer and adds the 3D tone via some extra harmonics. The Apollo only sound is quite nice, and probably fine to many people, but the Noble just takes it up a notch. You get a deeper and warmer sound. I can hear this pretty obviously through headphones.

If all the Noble did was just this, it would be a rad $300-400ish dollar tube pre because it definitely makes a difference to the sound. But then you add in the EQ, which is seriously killer (I don't boost mine too much - around 8 o clock on bass and 9 o clock on treble, but it works on both active or passive basses. It is exceptionally clean) Then you add in the fact that I have a pedal board powered by the device plus the extremely high quality of the build and that is why I think it is worth the money.Especially huge if you play sessions and also use in ears at live gigs. It really changes the game there.

Hopefully this helps and once things settle down I will be able to do a demo where people can hear the two tones and what the difference is. Both the Apollo and the Noble are incredibly good for what they do.When you combine them it is a dream tone - at least for me.

A signal can be heavily processed without being over-hyped! It's just down to the taste and ears of the engineer. The best outboard gear is often super expensive because it's capable of creating natural sounding results. But in any case I'll have to take your word on this, because as you say you have the Apollo there, and I am ultimately just making assumptions - although I am going to remain sceptical until I know what was really used in those videos. To my ears the Ampeg sim is in there, as well as a cab sim, as well as a compressor and some high frequency boost, and it sounds like it's blended with the clean signal, maybe 70% clean blended with 30% amp / cab sim. But I'm willing to accept if that's wrong of course. (ps. the drum samples are also heavily processed, albeit with way less subtlety than the bass).

Oh top of being a working bass player, I am a working photographer. That’s a bad example. Most of those camera adverts contain fully processed video and stills.

I took a leap in on the Noble from all the great videos Jack and others have posted. There is nothing misleading at all. Go play through one. It’s not the flavor of the week. It’s the kind of gear that becomes part of the main course. It’s simple, but it takes my sound to a special place that even my multi thousand dollar amp setup can’t achive. And that sounds great as is. Go play one and let us know what you think!

Ok perhaps that was a bad example, although it still points to questionable marketing tactics. It's a misrepresentation of the product - unless the processing behind the photos is made clear within the advert. I'm sure the Noble is fantastic, I'm not questioning that, I just want to be clear on whether the thing I'm hearing in the video used in advertising the product is a true representation of what it actually does.
 
Can’t comment much on recordings of the Noble box, but I can offer my experience:

I personally view my Noble as a live sound tool as much as anything. I play a ton of gigs and despise rucking an amp. For me, the Noble offers a direct-to-board solution that provides a sound that is full and true to the tone I hear in my head, without the option paralysis I experienced with all the knobs on some of the other preamps I’ve owned. I mounted the Noble to my pedal board and have reeled off close to 500 gigs since.

Tone is absolutely subjective, but for me, the Noble’s simple and effective design has been an outstanding example of a product that ‘just works’.

Only my experience, YMMV, etc.
 
Last edited:
Hey guys.....quick question about power amps and the Noble.

I'm looking at purchasing a dedicated power amp for my Noble. Really don't want an integrated amp (already have an Aguilar TH500).....just want a straight mono block power source. I've narrowed it down to 3 amps. I'm curious about.....

1) Jules M500 - [Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
2) Demeter Minnie 800 - Minnie 800D
3) GSS Baby Sumo - Boutique

I really dig the size and form factor of the GSS Baby Sumo. Not to mention, its about 1/2 cost of the aforementioned amps I'm looking at. The only thing what would concern me about the GSS BS is the darn thing bouncing off the cab if I gigged it. My only concern is it really doesn't have much of a presence on this side of the pond. The only real convincing thing I could pull up was a 5 page thread in which Mike Arnopool chimed in and gave a glowing endorsement.....I trust his ears, so it carries some weight if he says its a great amp. And obviously, both the Jules and Demeter mono blocks get rave reviews on TB. I've read the Demeter was designed with a bit if a voice (some high end and low end cut).....not sure if its true. The Jules amp looks cool, has glowing reviews, but $1000 for 500W is pretty steep. If the Jules was $700'ish, I would be ordering it. I'm leaning towards the Jules or GSS....kinda wondering what would you get to power YOUR Noble?
 
  • Like
Reactions: gkbass13
Hey guys.....quick question about power amps and the Noble.

I'm looking at purchasing a dedicated power amp for my Noble. Really don't want an integrated amp (already have an Aguilar TH500).....just want a straight mono block power source. I've narrowed it down to 3 amps. I'm curious about.....

1) Jules M500 - [Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
2) Demeter Minnie 800 - Minnie 800D
3) GSS Baby Sumo - Boutique

I really dig the size and form factor of the GSS Baby Sumo. Not to mention, its about 1/2 cost of the aforementioned amps I'm looking at. The only thing what would concern me about the GSS BS is the darn thing bouncing off the cab if I gigged it. My only concern is it really doesn't have much of a presence on this side of the pond. The only real convincing thing I could pull up was a 5 page thread in which Mike Arnopool chimed in and gave a glowing endorsement.....I trust his ears, so it carries some weight if he says its a great amp. And obviously, both the Jules and Demeter mono blocks get rave reviews on TB. I've read the Demeter was designed with a bit if a voice (some high end and low end cut).....not sure if its true. The Jules amp looks cool, has glowing reviews, but $1000 for 500W is pretty steep. If the Jules was $700'ish, I would be ordering it. I'm leaning towards the Jules or GSS....kinda wondering what would you get to power YOUR Noble?


If you haven't seen it there's also this one:

Jay Ganz Straight Ahead Power Amp
 
I'm looking at purchasing a dedicated power amp for my Noble. Really don't want an integrated amp (already have an Aguilar TH500).....just want a straight mono block power source. I've narrowed it down to 3 amps. I'm curious about.....

1) Jules M500 - [Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
2) Demeter Minnie 800 - Minnie 800D
3) GSS Baby Sumo - Boutique

I'm leaning towards the Jules or GSS....kinda wondering what would you get to power YOUR Noble?

Maybe not exactly what you’re looking for, but don’t overlook the Quilter Bass Block 800. Bigger, heavier, and with an instrument front end, but it puts out 800W @ 4ohms, costs under $600 new, and is built like a tank. That’s what I use with my Noble on full band gigs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ExaltBass and sk8
Hey guys.....quick question about power amps and the Noble.

I'm looking at purchasing a dedicated power amp for my Noble. Really don't want an integrated amp (already have an Aguilar TH500).....just want a straight mono block power source. I've narrowed it down to 3 amps. I'm curious about.....

1) Jules M500 - [Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
2) Demeter Minnie 800 - Minnie 800D
3) GSS Baby Sumo - Boutique

I really dig the size and form factor of the GSS Baby Sumo. Not to mention, its about 1/2 cost of the aforementioned amps I'm looking at. The only thing what would concern me about the GSS BS is the darn thing bouncing off the cab if I gigged it. My only concern is it really doesn't have much of a presence on this side of the pond. The only real convincing thing I could pull up was a 5 page thread in which Mike Arnopool chimed in and gave a glowing endorsement.....I trust his ears, so it carries some weight if he says its a great amp. And obviously, both the Jules and Demeter mono blocks get rave reviews on TB. I've read the Demeter was designed with a bit if a voice (some high end and low end cut).....not sure if its true. The Jules amp looks cool, has glowing reviews, but $1000 for 500W is pretty steep. If the Jules was $700'ish, I would be ordering it. I'm leaning towards the Jules or GSS....kinda wondering what would you get to power YOUR Noble?

Do you have any opposition to running into the effect return of the Tone Hammer? That’s how I run mine about 75% of the time (for the other 25% I run the Noble into the instrument pre for a different voicing). If you bypass the pre, the Tone Hammer acts fine as power amp, and is pretty loud for a 500 watt head.

That said, all of these options are pretty impressive, so I don’t think there’s a bad choice among them.



If you haven't seen it there's also this one:

Jay Ganz Straight Ahead Power Amp

Dont have any experience with this amp, but I’ve been fortunate enough to share the stage with Jay several times during my brief stint with a country group a while back. You will not meet a nicer guy or a finer pedal steel player. He makes everything sound better! I would imagine this is a piece of top notch gear.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ahc and ExaltBass
Do you have any opposition to running into the effect return of the Tone Hammer? That’s how I run mine about 75% of the time (for the other 25% I run the Noble into the instrument pre for a different voicing). If you bypass the pre, the Tone Hammer acts fine as power amp, and is pretty loud for a 500 watt head.

That said, all of these options are pretty impressive, so I don’t think there’s a bad choice among them.



Dont have any experience with this amp, but I’ve been fortunate enough to share the stage with Jay several times during my brief stint with a country group a while back. You will not meet a nicer guy or a finer pedal steel player. He makes everything sound better! I would imagine this is a piece of top notch gear.

Yeah....I’m not opposed to running the Noble into the TH. But, I guess I’m just looking for something different. I guess I just need a good excuse to spend money LoL!
 
Yeah....I’m not opposed to running the Noble into the TH. But, I guess I’m just looking for something different. I guess I just need a good excuse to spend money LoL!

No arguments from me on that front! some excellent choices on your list - if it was my money I’d spring for the Jules (mainly because I like the voicing of the Noble as is). If my Noble has taught me anything it’s that sometimes you do actually get what you pay for. They Jules stuff has always given me the same feeling, although I don’t currently own any.
 
I run my Noble into the FX return on both a Phil Jones Bass BG-150 combo and a Euphonics Audio iAMP Micro. I find using the preamp on both amps to be "too much" ... but that's because both of my basses have an on-board powered EQ. There's a Sadowsky preamp in my Fender Jazz and a Fishman preamp in the Taylor AB-1 acoustic bass. I like to add a little EQ with both onboard preamps and usually go light on Noble EQ. Adding a third preamp to the chain becomes too much of a good thing -- hence use of the FX return.

I wouldn't overthink the power source. It takes concentrated dedication to make a Noble sound bad. Just play it and enjoy!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tom F and ExaltBass
So I had an audition for a band but ultimately didn’t get the gig. On a positive note they raved about my sound. You guessed it, the noble.

Used it into the Effects return of the provided rehearsal amp. They thought it was the amp providing it......

Shame they didn’t rave about my playing......... :D
 
  • Like
Reactions: ExaltBass
So I had an audition for a band but ultimately didn’t get the gig. On a positive note they raved about my sound. You guessed it, the noble.

Used it into the Effects return of the provided rehearsal amp. They thought it was the amp providing it......

Shame they didn’t rave about my playing......... :D

Well, if they weren’t smart enough to realize “your sound” wasn’t the result of “their amp”, then they don’t deserve you!

Or, your Noble!
 
Here’s a song(s) we did last week. New arrangement of the two songs, but I’m especially happy with the tone of my bass even though (IMO) it sits just a tad low in this mix

Bass signal = Warwick Streamer LX 5 (DR Hi Beams) > Shift Line Buzz (Low gain) > Noble Preamp

Invalid Link Removed

Sounds great... although I agree with you... would love to hear you boosted just a little more in the mix. We did "Look To The Son" this week as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: adamaarts
Really enjoying the Noble into a powered cab. Simple, elegant configuration. Bonus: when you tip the cab back to hear better, there's no amp to tumble off!

PB-300.JPG