That would be the NS basscello, and it costs $2000 more. I don't know that there's sufficient interest in the basscello to make Ned do a cheaper version.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I guess I would get laughed right out of this thread if I dared mention out loud the desire to see a 34" scale version of this bass.
Whilst browsing YouTube I came across this
Nearly as good as me on a bad day![]()
I'm sorry guys, but am I the only one who watched this and thought it sounded absolutely terrible? Playing a million different cacophonous notes does not equal music in my ears. It honestly sounds more like a hand position exercise than anything else.
I'm not an NS player, but you might want to check this.I am ordering a wav bass but I want to put superflex on it
after the metal plate in the back there is about 2 inches of the bass' wooden body before you put through holles on the bottom
Does anybody think the strings will dig into the body ?
I am ordering a wav bass but I want to put superflex on it
after the metal plate in the back there is about 2 inches of the bass' wooden body before you put through holles on the bottom
Does anybody think the strings will dig into the body ?
I'm not an NS player, but you might want to check this.
"No eBay sales ads here"
It looks like they would, although it will be on the back of the instrument, and so would not be visible to audience members, although certainly to the player. If I string the bass in this way, I will almost certainly attempt to contrive a device to protect the body of the bass. I imagine a metal plate with some padding between it and the bass would do the trick.
Jennifer
Yep, and you know why.Well, I did put a link to some useful information in this post, but it's been removed.
Andy
I was giving what I thought was useful information, which happened to come from an ebay advert. The advert had nothing to do with me.Yep, and you know why.
Okay, lets try the quote this time, without the supporting link to the ebay advert it came from, since that seems to be against the rules.I am ordering a wav bass but I want to put superflex on it
after the metal plate in the back there is about 2 inches of the bass' wooden body before you put through holles on the bottom
Does anybody think the strings will dig into the body ?
Well cared for CRM4 upright electric bass. {snip} Some slight dents and scratches, particularly where proper double bass strings have been used which wrap round the bottom of the instrument. (the Maple Flame finish is pretty delicate), but otherwise in perfect nick.
I was getting back up to speed with this thread today, and took another look at my WAV having read Jennifer's comments as I was thinking about a 3/4 restring.
That's a good point that a wraparound 3/4 DB string set would indeed have to contact the wood at its 90deg turn, where it exits the rear of the body. I'm unsure sure whether the wood is hard enough to avoid lowered spring tension - and tuning intervals?
It would be a big help to learn how CR and EU models deal with routing of 3/4 stringing in this area. Though not identical, the geometry and relative constraints do look similar. Any comments appreciated.
I've seen this bass on ebay, and it would appear that some damage has been done to the bottom of the bass. However, the owner has strung the bass wrongly; he has wrapped the strings around the outside of the body when it seems to me that they should go through the holes the strings supplied with the bass go through. Why he did it this way I have no idea.
Jennifer
... Like you I assumed the correct way to fit the strings was to feed them through the holes. But as Jeffn has pointed out the strings do still ride on the back of the body, but I assume that NS consider this to be ok.