Is the tweeter control on the SM like the BB2 and BT2 (frequency shift) or is it a standard HF level control (L-pad)?
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
It works in the same way as the BB / BT, yes!Is the tweeter control on the SM like the BB2 and BT2 (frequency shift) or is it a standard HF level control (L-pad)?
@alexclaber I'm still a little confused on how it works...my ears aren't as good as they used to be. I have a BB2 and a SM. So, when the knob is all the way counterclockwise, that would mean a lower crossover point, right? In other words, counterclockwise gives you the most frequencies through the tweeter, and completely clockwise gives you the least...so the woofer does most of the work... IS THIS CORRECT, OR DO I HAVE IT BACKWARDS?It works in the same way as the BB / BT, yes!
@alexclaber I'm still a little confused on how it works...my ears aren't as good as they used to be. I have a BB2 and a SM. So, when the knob is all the way counterclockwise, that would mean a lower crossover point, right? In other words, counterclockwise gives you the most frequencies through the tweeter, and completely clockwise gives you the least...so the woofer does most of the work... IS THIS CORRECT, OR DO I HAVE IT BACKWARDS?
Yes. i think of it as left = the lower frequencies are sent to the tweeter right the highest frequencies are sent to the tweeter@alexclaber I'm still a little confused on how it works...my ears aren't as good as they used to be. I have a BB2 and a SM. So, when the knob is all the way counterclockwise, that would mean a lower crossover point, right? In other words, counterclockwise gives you the most frequencies through the tweeter, and completely clockwise gives you the least...so the woofer does most of the work... IS THIS CORRECT, OR DO I HAVE IT BACKWARDS?
Ha ha ha , just for laughs and doom...Haven't been able to do much more than about 5 mins yesterday. I've got a big band jazz gig tonight so I'll know more then. First impression was that it sounded great and had an unreal amount of volume for such a little box. I think I could probably cover most of my gigs with it alone. Kinda want to stack it on the BTII just for laughs and doom.
I placed my order for a PAIR of Super Compacts yesterday. After all, if one is good, then two should be twice as good, right?
My Barefaced Compact also replaced an Aguilar DB410 so I know exactly what you're talking about. Not that the Aggie sounded bad. It could sound incredible given the right room and stage mix, but more often than not it could be a struggle.First rehearsal with the new cab, and I'm amazed. As soon as the Meatsmoke gets here, the Aguilar rig will be put up for sale. Finally I can hear my bass, and so can the others. It's defined across the room. I played with everything flat, except for a little treble boost on the Ray34, and it just rips. It's everywhere. Wow. Just wow.
This is going to sound somewhat vague and maybe a little noobish, but I'm nothing if not both of those most of the time....
Does anyone here have real-world experience with both the 12XN550 driver and the 10CR250 driver? And if so, can you explain the sonic differences between them. The Barefaced website talks about a natural colorization of the 10CR250 versus the clarity and transparency of the 12XN550 ...but I'm not totally sure what that really means.
Thanks in advance!
This is going to sound somewhat vague and maybe a little noobish, but I'm nothing if not both of those most of the time....
Does anyone here have real-world experience with both the 12XN550 driver and the 10CR250 driver? And if so, can you explain the sonic differences between them. The Barefaced website talks about a natural colorization of the 10CR250 versus the clarity and transparency of the 12XN550 ...but I'm not totally sure what that really means.
Thanks in advance!
Sorry, did you say your Compact replaced the DB410?? What do you mean by "replaced"? Like , replaced as an equal , or replaced as a lower weight/volume option?My Barefaced Compact also replaced an Aguilar DB410 so I know exactly what you're talking about. Not that the Aggie sounded bad. It could sound incredible given the right room and stage mix, but more often than not it could be a struggle.
Tug, I've got two One10's and I love 'em, but I'm trying to decide if I want to add a 12" (or two) to the stable. But it's the age-old question: is the grass really greener in the 12" pasture?YES! I'm in the same boat as Earl. I've contacted Alex and I'm 99% sure of the cab I want, but still curious. And to expound a bit; I do have a One10, and it sounds great, and can definitely grind/get dirty when pushed. Since the 12's are so clean is it safe to say any grind/overdrive/distortion is going to have to come from me, meaning pedal, etc? Thank you from me too!!
YES! I'm in the same boat as Earl. I've contacted Alex and I'm 99% sure of the cab I want, but still curious. And to expound a bit; I do have a One10, and it sounds great, and can definitely grind/get dirty when pushed. Since the 12's are so clean is it safe to say any grind/overdrive/distortion is going to have to come from me, meaning pedal, etc? Thank you from me too!!
Tug, I've got two One10's and I love 'em, but I'm trying to decide if I want to add a 12" (or two) to the stable. But it's the age-old question: is the grass really greener in the 12" pasture?
Just hoping some folks can shed light on this.