TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I want one of them 35.25" scale XBs, a 5er or 6er. Longer scale is better IMO.
Not trying to deter you from an XB, which are also nice instruments, but if you are shying away from the Icon due to the B string, I can tell you that you wouldn't be disappointed with the standard scale. I'm really, really impressed with how solid and how "open" the B is on my Icon. I currently have a .130 on it, which I'm sure helps. Either way, the B is one of the best that I've played.
.So, I don't have a Carvin bass now at all, and it was absolutely one of the most beautiful basses I've ever seen. So, I'm sadly handing my number back in, and I guess it can go to the next guy.
Since my 'old #80 still seems to be available, I'll take it back for an incoming BB75Closeup pics of that fretboard as soon as it arrives!
Well, it has arrived!
It's a no-show Claro Walnut top, Birdseye Maple fretboard with no marker (side markers only). The body is Walnut and the neck is maple with a matching claro headstock. The electronics are the standard HB2 pickup (with coil switch) in the bridge position and the H50S in the neck position with Carvin's 18V active EQ.
I am a relative novice on the bass, but I am amazed at the range of tones available with the controls on this bass!! I've had it for about 2 weeks, and I haven't been disappointed one bit! It plays as well as it looks. The biggest problem I have is shifting to 5 strings!!! That 5th string still confuses me... hahaha...
Chris
Well, it has arrived!
![]()
Chris
Well, it has arrived!
![]()
![]()
![]()


!!!I started one in the "Amps" forum a while back. You can combine the two if you want or leave them separate. I don't want to keep track anymore....
My Carvin 210's (late 1990's) are a slight variant still:
light
cheap (esp. used)
loud
low*
the exception being the lows decrease after 100w, so by the time you're at about 350w, the lows are "flopping," even though the mids are still solid. So you can run two at 300w each with no "flop," but the lows have decreased too much by then, so you have to add low eq and pull back to about 200w each
And remember, the one 210 cab was advertised as doing 400w rms "full range" by itself? B-O-N-K!
Anyone else actually test their 210's at 400w on a stage with little wall-reflection? So many reviews seem to miss this criteria. Just sayin'.![]()

^ And here's my review of the Carvin 210's:
![]()
....I really like the cab, so I'm thinking about making it a 3-way with a better 10" (18 Sound or EV?) for the lows. I dunno though, 'cause I biamped it with my Sonic/EV 115 and the Carvin's mids & highs didn't knock me out either.![]()