And.....if you were stranded on a remote island with only the choice of one or the other......??

TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
And.....if you were stranded on a remote island with only the choice of one or the other......??

Does anyone know if the DI output of those units have a good transformer - like the Jensen transformer of Radial JDI? My main concern is unwanted ground loop noise, etc. I asked Origin as well, but maybe one of you knows the answer.
Yeah. It will be perfect if there's FX Loop and Headphones Out.
I guess in future they might do like a Revivaldrive with both sides, and add in those 2 above functions...
even though my favorite & play thru fender tube amps (super twin, showman or bassman-depending on the size of the gig), surprisingly if i had to choose between the two, while they're both excellent pedals, i'd go with the the super vintage.And.....if you were stranded on a remote island with only the choice of one or the other......??![]()
Damn you!even though my favorite & play thru fender tube amps (super twin, showman or bassman-depending on the size of the gig), surprisingly if i had to choose between the two, while they're both excellent pedals, i'd go with the the super vintage.
CB is really nice, but the TX is way nicer.Damn you!
I really dig the 64 and now I had to order the Super Vintage for comparison because I can't live with the feeling I'm missing something. By the way: The How good is the Cali76 CB? As I told before, I was a little hesitant. I do prefer my big fat Cali76 TX but the CB still rocks!
i like the cali76CB a lot but prefer the large box versions that don't accentuate the top end and have metering. the funny thing is, i actually preferred the very early non-TX version that i had (and stupidly sold) over the cali76TX that i currently own.Damn you!
I really dig the 64 and now I had to order the Super Vintage for comparison because I can't live with the feeling I'm missing something. By the way: The How good is the Cali76 CB? As I told before, I was a little hesitant. I do prefer my big fat Cali76 TX but the CB still rocks!
CB is really nice, but the TX is way nicer.
The actual transformer adds (while subtle) a more "3D-like" feel and "sweetened" tone to the signal YMMV.Why is that?
HA! I was thinking "they do add some sheen to the signal, don't they?". Maybe that's what I like, hehe. Anyway, looking forward to comparing them directly.i like the cali76CB a lot but prefer the large box versions that don't accentuate the top end and have metering. the funny thing is, i actually preferred the very early non-TX version that i had (and stupidly sold) over the cali76TX that i currently own.
HA! I was thinking "they do add some sheen to the signal, don't they?". Maybe that's what I like, hehe. Anyway, looking forward to comparing them directly.
Why do you prefer the Super Vintage to the 64 though? I'm in the same boat: My favorite amps seem to be Fender-ish.
Haven't we all "stupidly sold" a pedal and then someday regraded it? I know I have. I am very likely going to do it again.i like the cali76CB a lot but prefer the large box versions that don't accentuate the top end and have metering. the funny thing is, i actually preferred the very early non-TX version that i had (and stupidly sold) over the cali76TX that i currently own.

69 minute video... Not edited, with lots of chat, and obviously, not in English. They turn the pedal on at minute 5... You have been warned! Having said that, I got to hear some settings clearer than in some of the 'English language' demos so far...
I do not know why I am obsessing... I HAVE ordered the pedal already... Oh right, the WAIT! Cheers!
the '64's tone stack is not flat at noon, just like a fender amp, whereas the SV's is (baxandall).Yes good demo. Just enough drive for me. I thought the SV sounded really good with the EQ straight up. You could really hear the pedal sweeten things up without being EQ'd. I felt like the 64 suffered with the knobs straight up as the change seemed to be quite drastic between on and off and this may have been the tone stack not set close to flat?
I thought I wanted the 64 but I'm not sure now. I have a feeling I will get both eventually.
the '64's tone stack is not flat at noon, just like a fender amp, whereas the SV's is (baxandall).
I found it pretty flat at 2-10-2 on the eq.Sorry if it's already been covered but, what would you say is "flat" for the '64?
I've been enjoying mine w/ all eq around noon, sometimes mids boosted to get rid of the scooped sound.. but since watching that video ^^ i'm now like oh man I should have bought the SV one because it really does sound great with little adjustment.
for the DI, 0-full-0 is about as flat as it can be for me (just like on a fender showman). you might try slightly adjusting the two HF & LF trims when using the effect out to an amp.Sorry if it's already been covered but, what would you say is "flat" for the '64?
I've been enjoying mine w/ all eq around noon, sometimes mids boosted to get rid of the scooped sound.. but since watching that video ^^ i'm now like oh man I should have bought the SV one because it really does sound great with little adjustment.