- Apr 20, 2009
- 2,101
- 929
- Disclosures
- I'm the Squier of Fenderbirds
The above pic reminded me of times past. This was my T Family in probably 2006 / 2007. I hate to say that I paid $500...total for all three!...back then. Those were the days!
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Interesting...maybe i have a thick T40....as its also thicker than my '71 Jazz, '06 P Deluxe and my '13 63P AVRIGreat, you got a thin Fender.
Not one of my 6 T-40's were thicker than my Fenders![]()

Great, you got a thin Fender.
Not one of my 6 T-40's were thicker than my Fenders![]()

Tape measure. Nice oneWhat did you measure it with?...a tape measure?
I went with something accurate when measuring it today.
Crazy! So their thickness was all over the place! And who knows when that dropoff went away? I guess I should date my burst T-40...... be back soon@JEDI BASS I've had this for awhile now and never noticed it...until you just posted a pic!!
My '81 blade-pup also has the "drop-off"
View attachment 4157604
Yep it still has the string ferrules, just an incompatible bridge :/ Luckily its a damn good one. If I were to try and get a new bridge I'd want the original Peavey one and I doubt the BA2 will cover that (although I have no clue what those go for). Im also afraid that the Peavey bridge wouldn't cover the holes they drilled for the BA2.Looks cool, but it is crying out for a string-through bridge. Luckily if you decide to go that way, you can sell the BA2 to pay for it. Does it still have the string ferrules on the back? Luckily it looks as though the electronics are intact, and that's certainly a good thing.
I think that an '81 T-40 with a hole in the headstock and replacement bridge selling for $580 bodes very well for when I sell my '79!
Yep it still has the string ferrules, just an incompatible bridge :/ Luckily its a damn good one. If I were to try and get a new bridge I'd want the original Peavey one and I doubt the BA2 will cover that (although I have no clue what those go for). Im also afraid that the Peavey bridge wouldn't cover the holes they drilled for the BA2.
Electronics are clean and intact, but the pickguard has warped in a way that makes it difficult to turn some of the knobs. I bet if i can loosen those knobs with an allen key and raise them up a little bit, itll fix that issue.
Very interesting. Is been known for a while that later T40s are more contoured and tapered but are you saying that they're also thinner in middle of the body too?I just used my digital calipers to compare. It seems that my blade pickup equipped T-40 and T-45s have thinner bodies than my earlier T-40 body. It came with a neck that had the frets worn flat and dated pre-1980 (can’t remember exact year).
So, my ash T-40 and black T-45 are about 39.5mm thick right below the bridge. My white pre-‘80 body is about 45mm. My 2 MIJ fender P basses are about 42.5mm.
I noticed a pretty radical body shape difference when comparing the pre-‘80 to the later T basses. The white older bass is thicker throughout the middle (bridge to neck) with a drop off behind the bridge (see pics). My other T basses do not have that thicker middle and drop off.View attachment 4157545View attachment 4157544
Yes, the older T-40s are thicker down the midline.Very interesting. Is been known for a while that later T40s are more contoured and tapered but are you saying that they're also thinner in middle of the body too?
That would be good information to add to the T40 incite infosheet. Still looking for someone to take that over....
Yes, the older T-40s are thicker down the midline.
Read this.....So then what is a blade pickup? I mean, I know it looks different, but what magnet does it have in one of the later T-40s? Is it alnico, or is it still a ceramic?...Jim