• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Peeing In The Sink To Save Water?

Honestly, nether do I. He had me going until the chem-trail conspiracy stuff, tho.
It would make more sense if the government was trying to alter the weather to increase the rainfall and so called chemtrails were a bi product of that.(Cloud seeding, etc) But according to this video the government is trying to create a drought in the Western states. Normally you follow the money when trying to figure motives. But the drought is bad for the GNP which is also bad for the government so that does not make sense here. Just sayin.
 
Last edited:
When I am walking to the toilet to pee, I rarely look at the sink and think about peeing in it. Unless there is a long line at a concert or something. Then the sink becomes a piss receptacle. 5 to 8 perfectly good sinks not being used when there are 30 guys in line is simply illogical. Saving water? Mmmm, I'll have to run that by the wife.
 
California hopes to ease drought woes with ocean water

"What will be the largest water desalination plant in the Western Hemisphere has been built in San Diego.

The $1 billion plant, being built by a private company, will suck in 100 million gallons of water per day from the Pacific Ocean, strip out the salt using an elaborate filtration system and turn it into 50 million gallons of drinking water, enough for 300,000 San Diego County residents.

The company currently imports a majority of its water from drought-ravaged parts of California and the Colorado River Basin. San Diego will buy all of the water the Carlsbad plant will produce starting next year. Water bills will increase about $5 to $7 per month to cover the cost.

"It will represent 7 percent of our total water supply," Kerl said. "It's a significant chunk of water that, in the event of a drought, will be 100 percent reliable for this region."


http://www.cbsnews.com/news/california-ocean-desalination-plant-drinking-water-in-san-diego/
 
California hopes to ease drought woes with ocean water

"What will be the largest water desalination plant in the Western Hemisphere has been built in San Diego.

The $1 billion plant, being built by a private company, will suck in 100 million gallons of water per day from the Pacific Ocean, strip out the salt using an elaborate filtration system and turn it into 50 million gallons of drinking water, enough for 300,000 San Diego County residents.

The company currently imports a majority of its water from drought-ravaged parts of California and the Colorado River Basin. San Diego will buy all of the water the Carlsbad plant will produce starting next year. Water bills will increase about $5 to $7 per month to cover the cost.

"It will represent 7 percent of our total water supply," Kerl said. "It's a significant chunk of water that, in the event of a drought, will be 100 percent reliable for this region."


http://www.cbsnews.com/news/california-ocean-desalination-plant-drinking-water-in-san-diego/
So doe this mean you get to quit peeing in the sink? :D
 
So doe this mean you get to quit peeing in the sink? :D

Gawd, I hope so. It can be very awkward at times. Especially with the house guests. :facepalm:

Seriously, Im thinking this drought could be another 100 year event. But what if we had 2 or 3 desalination plants in L.A., maybe one in Santa Barbara and a couple more in the S.F. Bay area? Sure, it would cost much money/resources/energy to do it; but all these start-up costs could be offset with temporary rate hikes with the water bill.... They're talking $5 - $7/month increase average rate hike for the Carlsbad (San Diego) project.

Its doable.

Hopefully. Otherwise,

we're
images?q=tbn:ANd9GcR85Q9UYgRLdpTY63vVkBbxapWRtKHHf7_UpnGYPrpRYNd_PVDCMA.jpg
'd.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stewie26
Podcaster/comedian Adam Carolla has been an advocate of peeing in the sink for over a decade. He finally mentioned it to his past co-host Dr. Drew, who said urine is sterile as it leaves the body, so there isn't a true sanitary problem with peeing in the sink. Carolla suggests running the water several seconds afterwards so the urine doesn't collect in the u-joint under the sink.
 
Gawd, I hope so. It can be very awkward at times. Especially with the house guests. :facepalm:

Seriously, Im thinking this drought could be another 100 year event. But what if we had 2 or 3 desalination plants in L.A., maybe one in Santa Barbara and a couple more in the S.F. Bay area? Sure, it would cost much money/resources/energy to do it; but all these start-up costs could be offset with temporary rate hikes with the water bill.... They're talking $5 - $7/month increase average rate hike for the Carlsbad (San Diego) project.

Its doable.

Hopefully. Otherwise,

we're
images?q=tbn:ANd9GcR85Q9UYgRLdpTY63vVkBbxapWRtKHHf7_UpnGYPrpRYNd_PVDCMA.jpg
'd.

...or we could change the way we use water. I'm going to be reducing the size of my lawn. Actually, I could do without it altogether. Do we really need so many golf courses?
 
  • Like
Reactions: skychief
...or we could change the way we use water. I'm going to be reducing the size of my lawn. Actually, I could do without it altogether. Do we really need so many golf courses?

Or both? Howz about changing the way we use water AND build desalination plants?

FWIW, we pulled all the sod from the back yard and installed pavers. The only living thing in the back yard is a small pear tree (And a few weeds). We use a gallon of water/week; (~52 gal/yr).

To date, our adorable little tree has yielded TWO edible pears.

recalculating...
 
Our 2014/2015 rain 'season' is nearing the end of its cycle. Another dismally dry season for California. Only 6 inches of rain so far this season - less than half of the 15 inches average.

A video on the tragic socio-economic collapse of the central-valley farming community of Mendota where dustbowl conditions have crushed the hopes of the people who live there:



This might explain the reason for unusually high (national) prices for food.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jmattbassplaya
Greedy Californians are almost out of water.

MW-BG146_china__20130731035729_MG.jpg


SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) — Californians have been warned to cut back on their wasteful water usage. They're not, and we're all going to have to pay for it.

For a couple of years now, the state has been on high alert. Gov. Jerry Brown asked residents to cut back water usage by 20%, which some argued wasn't enough, given the dire circumstances. Residents and businesses responded with 8.8%.

The irony is thicker than gluten. Environmental alarmism is the official state pastime. But water only gets lip service.

So state officials must resort to disciplining the citizenry. Unprecedented water rationing could come any day. Some homes and businesses would be limited to outdoor watering just two days a week. Fines for unrepentant water wasters could reach $500 a day.

Still, the state's threats don't seem credible enough to actually stop people from watering their fern palms. Everyone out here talks about the drought. But no one seems to be doing anything about it.

As the state's four-year intensive drought drags on, the ramifications of who wins and loses the fight will have global implications. It's not just about the price of watering your lawn in Los Angeles; it's about the price of food on the table.

There are three main factions engaged in the conflict: environmentalists who want to preserve the watersheds, residents who want to keep shrubs green and washing machines churning; and the state's massive $21.4 billion agriculture industry.

The only thing the sides agree on is this: There is not enough water to go around. And, according to Jay Famiglietti, a NASA scientist: "The simple fact is that California is running out of water," he wrote in the Los Angeles Times March 12. "Right now the state has only about one year of water supply left in its reservoirs, and our strategic backup supply, groundwater, is rapidly disappearing."

To be fair, that has put resident Californians in a tough spot. Without rain, they tend to use more water from the existing water supply. At 38.8 million, California is the nation's most populous state, more than 11 million more than No. 2 Texas. So we Californians may not use a lot of water; there's just a lot of us. And we're competing for it.

That's because California is also the biggest farm state in the nation, producing more than Iowa, Nebraska and Minnesota combined. Farmers are in the same tough spot. They've been ordered to cut the usage of surface water by 80% to 100%. So they've been pumping out the once-vast store of underground water, which is causing environmental havoc.

No surprise, then, that water in California is the most expensive in the nation.

Like many U.S. communities, most California water districts use a tiered system of fees. For instance, in Irvine, if you use a standard amount of water, you pay a reasonable amount: $1.34 per cubic hundred feet of water. Use more, and you get charged $3.91 for the same amount. Rates top out at $12.60.

But even expensive water doesn't seem to have quenched California's thirst.

Should you think that Californians are alone in their wasteful ways, consider a 2011 white paper by the American Water Works Co. AWK, -0.08% It concluded: "The nation has developed excessive consumption habits that have put a serious strain on the available water supply as well as the system that delivers it."

And that is from a water company that wants to sell you water at higher prices.

But that's just the tip of the dry iceberg. The real pain comes in higher food prices. Increases start during a drought and then rise even after the drought is over. For instance, retail fruit and vegetable prices rose 3.7% and 4%, respectively, and kept rising a year after a very mild 2005 drought, according to the Department of Agriculture.

This year, the USDA is projecting price increases of up to 6% for some farm products.

Higher prices are just the start. Some have suggested the state may be in for a 200-year drought, given the changing climate. It doesn't have to go that long — trust me, it's bad enough that the state and the nation need to address the problem of a shrinking water supply and a growing population.

Scarcity makes people desperate. Syria experienced a devastating drought between 2006 and 2011. One estimate, by the United Nations, put crop failure at close to 75%. Perhaps it's no coincidence the nation has been at civil war and a hotbed for ISIS since then.

Let's hope that things in California don't deteriorate to that level. In the meantime, pray for rain.

Greedy Californians are almost out of water - MarketWatch
 
Peeing outside? Sure. Find your favorite tree and have at it. Peeing in the sink? Not such a good idea IMO. I would not want to brush my teeth in an area I've urinated. Back in the early 90's we used to pee in the toilet but only flush a number two.

I also remember reading about a guy back in the 90's who had a ship. He'd go up north with these huge water proof sacks that he could put an iceberg in and tow them to different areas of the world that needed fresh water. I've always wondered if he's still doing today?
 
Last edited:
Podcaster/comedian Adam Carolla has been an advocate of peeing in the sink for over a decade. He finally mentioned it to his past co-host Dr. Drew, who said urine is sterile as it leaves the body, so there isn't a true sanitary problem with peeing in the sink. Carolla suggests running the water several seconds afterwards so the urine doesn't collect in the u-joint under the sink.
Now that it has been mentioned, unless you have plastic traps in your sink, you really need to run the water to get the urine out of the trap. Urine is slightly acidic and will corrode metal traps.
 
Now that it has been mentioned, unless you have plastic traps in your sink, you really need to run the water to get the urine out of the trap. Urine is slightly acidic and will corrode metal traps.

I think the reason Carolla suggested the 'sink-flush' was to prevent the stale-urine odor from emanating from the trap. But thats a guess.

Your point is valid and something to consider for homes with metal traps.

On a side note, a drummer in one of the bands I play with, installed a deep-sink in his garage next to his washer/dryer setup a few years ago. He admitted that on occasion, he uses it for a urinal!

I think peeing in the sink is not as uncommon as most folks believe.
 
I think peeing in the sink is not as uncommon as most folks believe.

Let's see..... I have pissed on a tree, pissed in the snow, pissed in the shower, pissed in the ocean, pissed in my bed when I was a toddler, pissed in pools when I was a kid, pissed off the side of a boat a few days ago, pissed in my pants when I was scared, pissed on a so called friend once, and pissed on the wall next to the toilet when I was drunk. With that said, I can honestly say I never have pissed in a sink. Just sayin.:D
 
Last edited: