Excuse me but, will you do us all a favor of defining, “better”?
![]()
I started the sentence by using the words "To me". So to me, Rush has a better bass player. Others may disagree, which is totally fine.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Excuse me but, will you do us all a favor of defining, “better”?
![]()
I started the sentence by using the words "To me". So to me, Rush has a better bass player. Others may disagree, which is totally fine.

I feel the same way every time I try to get through an entire Rush album. Then wonder why I even tried, yet again lol.

I like LZ more for the bluesy quality to their music, and Rush more for their modern industrial aesthetic. There is a lot of music from each of their catalogues that I can’t stand listening to any more.
Houses of the holy and Moving pictures are my favorite album from each of them. If we are talking about bands an not just bass players, wouldn’t Aerosmith be a better comparison to Led Zeppelin than Rush?
I hope they’re not in your drawersComing from a very blues background … you can probably guess where my sediments are.



Synth and Keyboard Rush is my favorite era of Rush, everything after Hold Your Fire I have no interest in. I don't mind the stuff pre-Moving Pictures but it's rare that I listen to it.I'm a HUGE fan of Rush's keyboard-heavy 80's stuff. Not really so much of their early stuff though.
And while i respect and appreciate the artistry of Led Zeppelin, i'm just burnt out on them. Sorry.
No comparison. Rush had a 40+ year career, versus Zep's ten years.
Besides, Rush are just better.
10 years vs 40 pretty much says it all in platinum album sales I'd say it's a no brainer View attachment 4756516