Post your pedalboards - Part IV

[Bassplayer_479]

nope....lol

 

[moogboy]

-((?144)/4-4) Better?

the answer is: 0

 

[saxnbass]

Moog, is it showing up questionmark144 for you? Cause it's supposed to be square root of 144.

 

[moogboy]

Moog, is it showing up questionmark144 for you? Cause it's supposed to be square root of 144.

no, it is showing up as the square root. let me explain it. you start by doing what is in parentheses, which is square root of 144 times divided by 4 minus 4. and the fact that there is a - at the beginning makes it 0. i love Math.

 

[saxnbass]

Parenthesis first: square root of 144=12
Then you have -(12/4-4) so parenthesis first, and then division first, so:
12/4=3, therefore:
-(3-4), again parenthesis: 3-4=-1
-(-1)=+1

Therefore: -((√144)/4-4)=+1

 

[Pearl_jammin]

Ugh....this is a new low for the 'Post your Pedalboard' threads....

 

[moogboy]

Parenthesis first: square root of 144=12
Then you have -(12/4-4) so parenthesis first, and then division first, so:
12/4=3, therefore:
-(3-4), again parenthesis: 3-4=-1
-(-1)=+1

Therefore: -((?144)/4-4)=+1

okay, so i was ONE off. big deal.

 

[saxnbass]

okay, so i was ONE off. big deal.

Makes a big difference in the answers, depending on the equation/problem. Like that incident with the NASA shuttle that got buried instead of landing cause of a small error in one of the math problems.

 

[Pearl_jammin]

AGHHH.

.
.
.
.
.
.
Link Removed

There, it's not mine but I'm going to pretend to stop this maths madness.

 

[moogboy]

Makes a big difference in the answers, depending on the equation/problem. Like that incident with the NASA shuttle that got buried instead of landing cause of a small error in one of the math problems.

but i dont work for NASA. oh well. go solve the problem i put in a thread in OT.

 

[Jared Lash]

Ugh....this is a new low for the 'Post your Pedalboard' threads....

+1

Post Your Pedalboard IV is not off to a good start.

I could give a tutorial on integration by trigonometric substitution or do some Riemann sums for you, but I'd rather see some damn pedalboards.

For my part I've got two new pedals on the way and am just waiting on the release of a third.

[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]

 

[moogboy]

AGHHH.

.
.
.
.
.
.
Link Removed

There, it's not mine but I'm going to pretend to stop this maths madness.

OH. MY. GOD. PM me with how much the guy wants for the Bi-Phase.

 

[sonicvi]

okay, so i was ONE off. big deal.

actually you were an undefined amount off since you can't divide by 0.

 

[sonicvi]

i dunno, I think that board really could use another phaser.

 

[Sir Edward V]

I could give a tutorial on integration by trigonometric substitution or do some Riemann sums for you, but I'd rather see some damn pedalboards.

pfft that **** is easy, how about some Multi-Variable Differential Equations?

lol, sry I'm a Engineering/Math Major

but yes, back to pedalboards! much more entertaining

 

[hansfranz]

Holy hell, that's beautiful! That's probably about how big my next board is going to be! But why put the pedals on a board if he's using GCX switchers? Wouldn't a rack be more practical if you're using a switching system?

The only thing that would make that board cooler would be to mount a few of those little figurenes on it. I've heard they improve tone even more than blue LED's...

 

[sonicvi]

Holy hell, that's beautiful! That's probably about how big my next board is going to be! But why put the pedals on a board if he's using GCX switchers? Wouldn't a rack be more practical if you're using a switching system?

Maybe to have presets and MIDI switching but have the knobs still be in front on the floor?

 

[eltonsbass]

 

[Unknowndude]

got my fab echo modded... and pics of board soon

 

[vtwo]

1. M-Audio makes pedals?! -does a search-

2. tiny un-enlargeable thumbnails make me sad

3. keep them coming! my board's STILL being made so I'll have mine up soon... definately within the month.

edit: Mi Audio.. oops.