• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Praise Report: GHS Precision Flats

Blasphemy! :rage: & Repentance! :laugh:
Mine will stay on until either I need a new set or Armageddon! :wideyed:

Despite my gushing elsewhere on this forum, I took the GHS Progressives off my Jazz bass and tried something else a couple of times, in disbelief that they could actually be that good. But they really are. I'm now even more convinced of it than I was initially.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jon Moody
Hello, Guys, i wanna get a set of GHS precision Flat for my CV 60P, i prefer light gauge, are the tone is same between both M3050 and 3025 ?
Need advise, TQ.
I have both sets plus the LaBella 760FL. The M3050 on my pbass copy sounds like the 760FL set but thumpier. Amazing with pick and plucked. The 3025 is much weaker by comparison but still thuddy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Yahboy
i just ordered a set of 3050, well see how they stack up with the balanced tension set. i'm excited for lower action, less fret buzz, and thicker fatter sound :)

well i got the 3050 and am going to sell them, i like the balanced set better. i really didn't notice any difference in tone, just in tension and i realized the 3050 were too high tension for me. so i'm happy with my 45 60 80 105 precision flats, just need another 2 months of playing to break them in a little more :)
 
I can has flatwounds?
k thanks.
IMG_7905.JPG
 
I looked at the tension for the 55 and it's about 19 lbs. That's less than half of what the 45 tension is and would probably make the 55 string too floppy...
It would be awesome if GHS made a 50.

Sounds like you may be reading the chart wrong. The .055 tuned to G has a tension of 68.8 lbs, vs. 41.5 lbs. for the .045 tuned to G. That's a huge gap and the reason why GHS should consider coming out with a .050 to fall somewhere in between around 55 lbs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: soflbass
just realized I've been fooled this whole time. I ordered a set from Bass Strings Online for 45 60 80 105 but just looked at the wrappers 4 months later and it's a FB100 not FB105. apparently I got 45 60 80 100 instead. they sound great and are supple enough for me, I tried the 55 70 90 105 and they were too tense for me, but I do miss that 105 E string, maybe i'll try the 45 65 85 105 now :)
 
Loving mine, coming up on a year and they sound awesome! Did run into troubles thou... My fingers get mildly damp while playing sometimes. Sticky! Friction got painful. Long slides gave me burns and I actually considered swapping. Luckily I came across GHS Fast Fret. Eureka! Smooth as silk, no more friction burns and I´m faster up and down the neck than ever before :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Linnin
I had a 55-105 set sitting around for a couple years... put it on a few times, but I was usually back to my LaBellas or Sadowskys by the end of the day – never really did much for me. Then the other day, I decided to give them another try out of the blue. Spent an hour+ dialing in a full proper setup, which I never quite did any of the other times I had them on... huge difference! This is probably the lowest action and neck relief I've ever achieved, thanks in part I'm sure, to the higher tension.

The increased tension on the treble strings makes for a whole new playing experience... I tend to do a lot of JPJ-style 1-5-1/power chord stuff, and I find that the added stiffness in the D and G gives me way more control and articulation when raking across three strings.

The tone is pretty sweet so far... next to DRs, they're probably the most broken-in sounding flats I've used. Huge bottom end with a pleasant, understated crunch in the highs/high mids that cuts through juuuust enough. The Sadowsky Black Labels I'd had on previously had a massive, growling mid-range presence that I loved, and yet somehow I don't find myself missing it.

Paint me impressed!