not sure if labella got sued too or if they've always just used the 1954 vintage original to get around it.
Yes, from what I've read, La Bella did get into trouble for using the "Jamerson" name, which was later changed to "1954 Original".
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
not sure if labella got sued too or if they've always just used the 1954 vintage original to get around it.
Actually it is the 1963 reissue, but you mean well, so funk on.
Yes, from what I've read, La Bella did get into trouble for using the "Jamerson" name, which was later changed to "1954 Original".
No. Way back in time, 1963 to be exact, Fender brought out the very first rosewood fretboard Precision electric bass guitar. James Jamerson's very famous 'Funk Machine' was and still is to this very day a 1963 Fender Precision Electric Bass guitar with the now famous rosewood fretboard. It's a fact. It's history.they must have changed it. few years ago it was the 1962.
they must have changed it. few years ago it was the 1962 american vintage reissue which was on the "jamerson" bass ads were they got sued over.
No. Way back in time, 1963 to be exact, Fender brought out the very first rosewood fretboard Precision electric bass guitar. James Jamerson's very famous 'Funk Machine' was and still is to this very day a 1963 Fender Precision Electric Bass guitar with the now famous rosewood fretboard. It's a fact. It's history.
of course you're wrong. have a drink. get over it.so no i'm not wrong.
of course you're wrong. have a drink. get over it.
I'm talking about reality and history! I am the the King of the Mountain! HUZZAH!i'm not going to get into an argument over this. we are talking about 2 different things. you're talking about james' personal bass, i'm talking about a reissue fender made. not sure why you're dying on this hill.
I recently emailed GHS about making these in regular long scale instead of long scale plus, but haven't heard back. I really love these strings, but even with them strung through body on my Jazz, they're a bit too long. I really want to put a set on my '69 P, but it's top-load only, and they'd be way too long.
I recently emailed GHS about making these in regular long scale instead of long scale plus, but haven't heard back. I really love these strings, but even with them strung through body on my Jazz, they're a bit too long. I really want to put a set on my '69 P, but it's top-load only, and they'd be way too long.
What happened to this thread? How did it slip off the front page?
Nooo....
I miss my Jazz with these flats. I haven't heard from the buyer. Seems like he's plenty happy with the bass and the strings.
One thing I'd like to share, these flats can sound quite lively (even when broken in) on a Jazz with both pups and the tone dimed, and especially with a pick. It's got that other vintage flatwound that has that sort of grind without losing the bottom end.
Also, I gave him the GHS nylon set too. The more I think about that set, the more I should have put it on the P-bass instead. Oh well, ancient history now...
Isn't that what side cutters are for?
Forget It. Not Happening.I'd like at least a little silk showing off the tuning key on the E string.
But it is. One quarter of a wrap.The thickest part of the string shouldn't be wrapped around the tuning key
but it doesn't and they don't.it increases the chance of breakage.