Sweet photos allotabass, the prototype P-bass is beautiful and the Lead bass sure is interesting too - was the Lead ever put in production??
Z
Z
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Without doubt, someday I will own one of these.![]()
![]()
Relic Burgundy Mist Team Built CS Jazz
I don't know if it's really that rare, but it is unique and expensive!
I got one for ya'll. This is a complete custom shop Fender. I believe this was built for the bass player from Alien Ant Farm. I remember reading the information next to it and seeing in relation to that.
![]()
When you have to look through 10K+ pics too find a super rare piece, the wait is worth it. And no it's not mine.
1981 Fender Lead Bass I
![]()
Hmmm...well maybe they can't give me the patent numbers. The Pino has them, but maybe those decals are pre-distressed. In any case, mine came without. It also doesn't have the period correct flat poles like the Pino, but it does sound good. I'm waiting to see if I can get some answers from the CS about those 2 issues. If I get lucky I'll be able to post some pics of it right now.
).
...
.I think this qualifies as "rare".
A 1978 Maple Fretless Antigua Finish P-Bass. Some call the color "pukeburst". Fair enough. This is the only fretless maple example I've come across & I love it!
![]()
![]()
It seems to work for the Pino though, I think.Oh yeah, I see what you mean - I'd never noticed those patent numbers on the Pino model before (shame they have to relic the logo too).
You believe correctly, but no, it's supposed to be a '62. They may have used the parts they use for the '59s, but the neck on this one is a bit chunkier than the one on my '59.In fairness to the CS though, your bass is supposed to be a '59, isn't it? In which case, the patent numbers would be historically inaccurate (they first appeared in 1961, I believe).
It has (had) the non-raised A poles. I presume they were the '62 reissue pups.So Jason, does your pickup have raised "A" pole-pieces (as used from '57 to '58), or does it have one like this ...
I don't know. This is a sore subject for me too. They take the time to include the router hump and the correct body and headstock contours. It would be nice if as much attention was paid to the pickups.I don't know how Fender can make the pickup on the Pino model look so historically authentic, when all of their other CS P Basses get these "production line" vintage reissue (as used on the US Vintage series basses) pickups, with the pole-pieces that look like they've been put through a pencil sharpener...
![]()
Every other pickup manufacturer seems to get it right...
... so why can't Fender?
These pickups didn't sound bad to me. I may have lived with them if it were the only issue I had, but since it was going back anyway...Personally, I find the Fender pickups sound too thin for my liking anyway, so I swapped both of mine out for the Fralins and am very happy with the tone now.
[/RANT]
I MUST HAVE IT,CONTACT ME!!!!I'll play
![]()
Custom shop 10th anniversary. FMT body in sunburst.
Link Removed
FMT V now discontinued, probably the best non custom shop Fendermade!Link Removed![]()
![]()
FSR 75RI MIA Jazz bass, only 200 made in Candy apple red.
![]()
Precision special bass made of walnut from the early 80's.
Is there something special about a FSR????Does mine count, its an fsr![]()
...
I got a call two weeks ago from the CS to make sure they were doing what I wanted. They said they had already replaced the logo and told me they were out of stock of the Pino pickups but were special winding me a set. They also asked me if I wanted them aged like Pinos, to which I said no.
I should be seeing it any day now.
...
You believe correctly, but no, it's supposed to be a '62. They may have used the parts they use for the '59s, but the neck on this one is a bit chunkier than the one on my '59.
It has (had) the non-raised A poles. I presume they were the '62 reissue pups.
I don't know. This is a sore subject for me too. They take the time to include the router hump and the correct body and headstock contours. It would be nice if as much attention was paid to the pickups.
These pickups didn't sound bad to me. I may have lived with them if it were the only issue I had, but since it was going back anyway...
I didn't, however, like the pickups on my '59. I agree with you about them sounding thin. I replaced those with Antiquities and it's now the nicest bass I've ever had. I'm hoping the '62 tries to supplant it, but it has mighty big shoes to fill.
!Well, be sure to come back and post some more pics, won't you?
Interesting stuff!
I didn't realise that the neck profiles differed from '59 to '62, but I'm no expert (or did you custom order it with a fatter neck?).Hope your '62 fulfills all of your wishes too, Jason.
![]()
Thanks, Fender32. I will post more pics when it gets here.
I didn't ask for a fatter neck...in fact I wish I'd have asked for it to be like my '59, but I assume they're all a bit different from neck to neck anyway. I hope you'll be enjoying your '59 as well when you get it.
'83 Walnut Elite II P:
![]()