• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Rickenbackers

I bought my first Ric 4003 brand new in 1974. I have owned other Rics as well since then. But I haven't owned any in the past 10 years or so. I have a P bass and a J bass, both with necks that have a 1.5 inch nut width. That seems to fit my left hand better. I think that's why I haven't owned any Rics lately.

If I could find a Ric (either a 4003 or 4003s) with a 1.5" (or near 1.5") nut width, I would consider buying it.
 
More (unfinished) Fuel from that hotbed of Flagrant Trade Dress Violators festering away over in Luthier's Corner. I added CF stiffeners instead of two truss rods, and a volute so the head is less likely to snap off. Sacriledge!
View attachment 2745974
View attachment 2745975

These wood nerds have to be stopped! Somebody might get offended and read a different thread in a red-hot hissyfit!

That needs a pearloid trc

upload_2017-9-5_19-31-56.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nev375
The truth is this bass came with 2 15k ohm humbuckers and it had 250k ohm pots ... so the Nordstrand pickup and the 4 band Audere preamp was a significant upgrade ... stock this bass was an Edsel Dog ... pretty much lame in every way except it was pretty ...

I owned the bass for less than a month ... This is what it looked like when I sold it ... It had a much better and more versatile tone then than the stock Edsel wiring ... From the factory this bass was very lame. basically a 3 string bass with bad tone on the 3 strings. The original bass had a thicker tone than a normal 4004 because of the additional wood on the thicker neck which made the stock electronics even more lame.

Probably the new owner of this bass will probably be an amateur player and a collector. It will hang on the wall and never be gigged ... like most Rickenbackers.

upload_2017-9-5_19-37-41.jpeg


upload_2017-9-5_19-38-50.jpeg



upload_2017-9-5_19-38-14.jpeg
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-9-5_19-38-34.jpeg
    upload_2017-9-5_19-38-34.jpeg
    18.6 KB · Views: 18
In hindsight I was probably crazy to mod this bass because most Ric owners want stock rather than good tone.

But when I bought it I was going to keep it and gig it. But a situation came up where I needed money so it had to go.
 
I have been playing Rickenbackers since 1973. I love the tone and the look ... But I really have a hard time with the Rickenbacker Cult mentality and the "attitude" of the Rickenbacker faithful. The Arrogance makes me uncomfortable.

For instance it is fine to modify and build copies of Fenders, but not Rickenbackers. If I build a Rick copy and post it here I will get a lot of hatred directed my way, and I get that hate just for modifying Rickenbackers. But If I build a copy of a jazz bass and put in active electronics then everybody will praise my workmanship.

If you compare basses to cars then Fenders are like a Chevy, Gibson would be a Buick, Ibanez would be a Toyota, and ... Rickenbacker ... would be an Edsel ... There is no other bass manufacturer that can't seem to make a proper 5 string bass.

I am thinking of making a special TRC for my 2 Rics that says Edsel or Edselbacker

Keep doing what you're doing, Jeff. You're fine.

Wanna see haters, post a Gibson. Mods or no mods
 
  • Like
Reactions: RedVee
You see the Rickenbacker purists used to love me, because I played the holy grail of Rickenbackers ... a 1960s 4001 bass ... like Chris Squire and Paul McCartney, and it was very pretty and I knew how to make it rock ... But I made them a little nervous because this bass actually got played. It had fretware and a good belt buckle rash



upload_2017-9-5_20-14-50.jpeg



upload_2017-9-5_20-15-14.jpeg



upload_2017-9-5_20-15-45.jpeg


upload_2017-9-5_20-16-4.jpeg


upload_2017-9-5_20-16-22.jpeg