Willis has lines on his fretless, doesn't he?rabass6 said:Fretless, on the photo I posted the neck is the cocobolo one, in the 1st pic..it has fretlines in it, good, 'cause I'm really not Gary Willis on fretless (nor I am on fretted...)
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Willis has lines on his fretless, doesn't he?rabass6 said:Fretless, on the photo I posted the neck is the cocobolo one, in the 1st pic..it has fretlines in it, good, 'cause I'm really not Gary Willis on fretless (nor I am on fretted...)
No, he MUST have frets on his fretless...elros said:Willis has lines on his fretless, doesn't he?
rabass6 said:Diff. from cocobolo and ebony?
Rob explained that cocobolo is a little more open sounding, and ebony a little tight, but he insist that any difference is subtle, and cocobolo looks sweeter to me!!!
KJung said:+1 Rob told me the difference is mainly aesthetic. For some reason, Rob uses Cocobolo on the 4 string models and Ebony on the 5's... not sure what the logic is there.... maybe he feels the 'tightness' of the Ebony helps the B string tone?
barthanatos said:Yeah, I remember him saying something to that effect on the phone. I read some complaints about the B string, but frankly I have no idea what they're talking about. Mine sounds great!
KJung said:I am one who is not overly impressed with the B string sound. However, it's surely not horrible, and part of the lack of definition I hear in mine is most likely due to the tapewound flats. The main reason I got the 5 string version was so that the feel and scale length matched up to my fretted basses, which are all 35" scale 5 strings.
Quite frankly, if I was to do it over, I would get the 4 string with the slightly shorter scale length. No big deal though, and my B string makes a great thumbrest! It's a wonderful instrument.
I believe Tom Bowlus just ordered a Mouse (the 30" scale model). I understand those are very cool also, and the shorter scale results in the somewhat loose feel of the strings to even more closely mimic a DB type tone.
rabass6 said:This is one of the reasons I'm going with a 4.
The Mb 2 that I tried was a 5, with a koa-ebony neck and macassar ebony fingerboard, and the B hasn't impressed me a lot, useful, but not much more.
Partly due to the nylon tapewound strings, for sure, but I think there's something mechanically wrong in trying to produce the big, warm deep fundamental of a low B with such a "short" scale, remembering that the sound of this bass is really different from a standard electric fretless
rabass6 said:After all, how many 5 strings upright (with low B) are around?
I think not many...
KJung said:I believe Tom Bowlus just ordered a Mouse (the 30" scale model). I understand those are very cool also, and the shorter scale results in the somewhat loose feel of the strings to even more closely mimic a DB type tone.
rabass6 said:Tom, it's wonderful, really.
A SC Rob Allen is something to die for, but the Deep is too expensive for me at the moment, and I wasn't sure about the 30" scale.
Have you compared the Mouse and the Mb 2?
What's the difference in sound (I can imagine the feel is quite different!)?
rabass6 said:I'm sure I'll do some experiment with some foam in front of the bridge, to dampen the sustain a little, when I tried my friend's Allen, with a little right hand muting, it was very uprightesque, really acoustic and alive.
Not that it wasn't good in non muted playing, but maybe I'll buy a bassmute for extended tonal options!!!