Okay guys I put my bid in to have the bass held until friday (payday) so im trusting my TB brothers that this will be a kick ass bass...
Oh, it will be!
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Okay guys I put my bid in to have the bass held until friday (payday) so im trusting my TB brothers that this will be a kick ass bass...
the ONLY thing that the SBMM have over the SUB series is the contour body style.Okay guys I put my bid in to have the bass held until friday (payday) so im trusting my TB brothers that this will be a kick ass bass...
the ONLY thing that the SBMM have over the SUB series is the contour body style.
The OG SUB basses are "slab" style with rounded edges. Like the pre-EBMM Stingrays actually.
The SbMM basses have similar forearm and "beer belly" contours in the body.
I still prefer the old SUB series.
The diamond plate scratch plate is cheesy, but I dig the non-glossy body finish.
San Luis Obispo, California.
In other words where real stingrays etc are made. In other words, not the sbmm ray basses from Asia.
Yup - I currently have a Sterling5 HS, before that was a BFR SR5 HH, and my SUB5 is every bit their equal regarding tone, playability, and quality of construction...
- georgestrings
For me it's DR Sunbeams
Tony Levin has claimed to love them on at least some of his stingray basses if big names help back my claim. I'm sure there are other great strings though. These nail the tone for me that I was looking for from past stingray rentals for session work I did in the past.
I still stand by my opinion that the SUB is better in a bunch of ways than the full-blown Stingray.
I know you weren't asking me, but in my case mine are both
- 2 band eq which is (a) the rage right now and (b) just better sounding
- lighter than the stingrays I've played
- more durable finish-wise
- 5 strings with stingray-4 shaped pick guards instead of a growth coming off the pick guard like most actual stingray 5s
In what ways is it better?
I played a used one again today at a local pawn shop. Should have bought the thing, it sounded incredible as always! Super light too.
I still stand by my opinion that the SUB is better in a bunch of ways than the full-blown Stingray.
I know you weren't asking me, but in my case mine are both
- 2 band eq which is (a) the rage right now and (b) just better sounding
- lighter than the stingrays I've played
- more durable finish-wise
- 5 strings with stingray-4 shaped pick guards instead of a growth coming off the pick guard like most actual stingray 5s
Totally with you on the 5 string look. The oval pickguard looks so much better than the extended one on 5string Stingrays!
I have preferred my white SUB to my Stingray for long periods, but it comes and goes. Just a matter of preference to me, I could not tell you one is better than the other.
I have just put a colourless pickguard on the wine red SUB... lovely!
Almost bought a graphite 4 sub today for $500. Didn't get the chance due to work but would be pointless anyhow as I'm moving away from fours and have the same exact 5 already.
And to the O.P., what I meant about pick guards is subs have ovals on 5 while stingrays have a strange growth at bottom for controls LoL... Fugly
I,ve got a SUB,had it for 10 years now.
The other week I played a stingray classic,slab body,2 eq and it didn,t sound any better than my SUB through the same amp,same settings.
Only thing was they were wanting £2700 for it.