• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

"Serious skills, but..."

Status
Not open for further replies.
I've never been a fan of anything where the focus is on the players and how good they are. I like to hear well written songs, and I don't care how good the playing is on said songs. That being said, if the great songs happen to have great playing, even better. Yes, I have some favorite players, but they definitely aren't technique-focused players.

Unfortunately, this cancels out 99.9% of instrumental music for me. I've never heard an instrumental track that makes me think "wow, what a killer song!" But I'm not knocking that sort of thing. It's just unlistenable to my ears.
 
There is so many things to say here, all summed up nicely by simply stating that bass players who insist on boxing themselves into imaginary sets of rules do nothing but drag the rest of us down in the eyes of other likewise ignorant players. I wont use the term musicians, because most true musicians (who have not forgotten music is art and not a box) won't do this or have this view of others.

It's the same mentality that drives other super rewarding topics like string count, endless compressors, no rounds on fretless, how many notes to play, etc.....
 
I think a bass players style of playing is an attractant or a repulsion.
Also think tone becomes a factor in that atractant or repulsion.

If you find what you like, thats terrific. Some have to search a little longer. Older bass players that tend to like what and who they grew up with as influencers, tend to stop looking at newer trends as they inevitably stray away from those inflences.

Hence the pidgeon holing of an era to a style and sound. Boomers were the pioneers of the electric bass. That's a blanket approach perhaps but it covers a long spread from pethaps 1960 - mid late 70's. The trends therafter seem much shorter and don't spread as much influence across the subsequent age groups.

If you picked up the bass guitar and stayed with it, that's a good thing so matter you age or influences. I still go out and watch local bands and although there's no influence there, I still enjoy watching them do their stuff their way.
 
The whole boomer thing is ridiculous to me.

I'm born in late October of '64.


So if I'd have held out another three or four months, I'm suddenly a better person?


Cool.....
I've always disagreed with the classifications. Particularly in the UK. The disaffected generation were listening to Punk Rock including a band called Generation X so how come the term Gen X got applied to the happy go lucky generation who were into Wham! and Duran Duran? 🤷. As a result of this error they've had to create Generation Jones. Who is this Jones?

PS. I enjoyed Duran Duran too but "my music" is mid to late 70s bands like Blondie and The Police.
 
Generally speaking, highly technical music leaves me cold. I prefer certain emotional connections. If the emotional connections are there, than there is room for technique to be what evere it is.
💯

It might be because I'll never be a virtuoso but impressive technical brilliance is interesting but it doesn't get into my record collection unless it touches my emotions. Gary Moore's guitar solo on Out In The fields is a great example of his skills but I love it because it's a great solo musically, not because it shows off what a supremely accurate speed-picker he was.

I'm also not moved by intellectual music. Rick Beato's episode on songs by Sting highlights that - as usual Rick was wetting himself over the fancy chords of some of Sting's solo stuff but then he got to a Police song and to me it was "music at last".

The other thing I don't care about is the hierarchies and pecking orders that are really just childish "my favourite bassist is better than your favourite bassist" arguments. That used to be a thing at my highschool with tiresome discussions as to whether Jan Akkerman was the fastest guitarist in the world. Fortunately the tappers came along and rendered all that moot - thank you Eddie! 😁
 
💯

It might be because I'll never be a virtuoso but impressive technical brilliance is interesting but it doesn't get into my record collection unless it touches my emotions. Gary Moore's guitar solo on Out In The fields is a great example of his skills but I love it because it's a great solo musically, not because it shows off what a supremely accurate speed-picker he was.

I'm also not moved by intellectual music. Rick Beato's episode on songs by Sting highlights that - as usual Rick was wetting himself over the fancy chords of some of Sting's solo stuff but then he got to a Police song and to me it was "music at last".

The other thing I don't care about is the hierarchies and pecking orders that are really just childish "my favourite bassist is better than your favourite bassist" arguments. That used to be a thing at my highschool with tiresome discussions as to whether Jan Akkerman was the fastest guitarist in the world. Fortunately the tappers came along and rendered all that moot - thank you Eddie! 😁
Yes. I agree on all counts. I'd rather listen to green day or the police than jaco 99 times out of 100.

Also, David Gillmour is my favorite guitarist. All feel. Not a virtuoso in the technical sense.
 
  • Love
Reactions: FRoss6788
The whole boomer thing is ridiculous to me.

I'm born in late October of '64.


So if I'd have held out another three or four months, I'm suddenly a better person?


Cool.....
I'm still trying to understand it too but for a different reason. For the first 50 years if my life, a "boomer" was someone born post war, 1945 -1960. It was carved in stone and never questioned.
Since moving to the US, the term has been affected by calendar creep so that people born in some period in the '60's are included? WTH?
I don't get it and don't get the dart throwing. We are bass players which is a brotherhood, not a competition.
 
It doesn't matter which party or which shoe, it's taking a political shot safe in the knowledge that any political replies would break the rules. This comment is an admission that you knew exactly what you were doing.
IMG_3029.jpeg
 
if they were from Canada they would be Angine De Poutine
Poutine fries are considered a sacrilege in Belgium you know... specially the walloons beware if you come to Chimay or Charleroi. I still laugh when I write "french fries", it's the belgians that invented those for fck sake lol

Or like watching a youtube video made by americans talking about their "belgian malinois"... malinois comes from Malines (french version of Mechelen in dutch), it's a belgian city in the flemish region, Flanders so, so just call it a malinois ! It's like saying "hey I'm enjoying a canadian poutine"... it's ALREADY canadian if you use "poutine" dude hahaha

And by the way they are actually canadians, canadian french from Québec.
 
I’ve found lots of boomers to be some of the biggest stick-in-the-mud types when it comes to ongoing changes in musical styles and techniques, and I’m am a boomer, albeit in the “Generation Jones” second half. I had a feeling that the self-congratulatory Woodstock era crowd would be insufferable at some point. Yeah, don’t trust anyone over 30.
Throwing a blanket judgement over any demographic is myopic.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.