TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
ha ha ha ha..............good one!Does the etching say, "Wed Turbaus?"
View attachment 1077306 View attachment 1077305 Here's mine...
Yeah, these are mine and my 2 best "jewels". A 1953 P Bass which I just bought in Jan. of this year.
A 1966 P. Don't have a photos of the back side which has really cool distress.
View attachment 1077362 View attachment 1077364 View attachment 1077365 View attachment 1077366
It's an early 1958. The lower bout wear is the result of water damage, apparently. I think it is beautiful
Not to side track the thread. Excellent comment that you make about the stories these old basses could tell. Just makes me disappointed that I was not the person to put all of these hieroglyphics onto the bass. But, happy to own this dinosaur.Very cool (same B-day as mine!) Love the large barrel string ferrules. Interesting the high F is so worn - must have been used as a punctuation-mark over-and-over-and-over again over many years of gigging! These loyal & beloved beasts are filled with stories written in player specific hieroglyphics.
Not to side track the thread. Excellent comment that you make about the stories these old basses could tell. Just makes me disappointed that I was not the person to put all of these hieroglyphics onto the bass. But, happy to own this dinosaur.
I've spent days and days studying all of the wear marks on this bass.
As best as I can tell, the severe markings, wear and discoloration at fret #20 are the result of the bass being plucked off of the edge of the neck and most likely the thumb would roll of the strings and stop and rest on the wood at those spots on #20. Destroying the lacquer over time. How many songs and hours did that take?
Good eye, JIO!
Here's a distressed jazz I put together with a Warmouth body and Mexi Fender neck. Nice and light at 8 pounds even.
View attachment 1086319 View attachment 1086320 View attachment 1086321 View attachment 1086322 View attachment 1086323
The way I see it is that it's a continuum - passed along to the next player as I will eventually pass it along to another player. Sting and Bobby Vega feel the same way - monster players both who could easily put that kind of wear on a new bass over time but both chose the road-warriors they favor because of what those instruments have gone through and the result sonically of time and use. There are the closed-minded who poo-poo "mojo" and in most ways justifiably so as like most terms it's vastly exaggerated and flippantly used (like; "plays like butter", "vintage", etc.) But I know it is real - my '66 has it in spades. It's because these basses have been played professionally every year since when they were new and as wood is organic and porous it absorbs vibrations, sweat and the constant human contact. I would never trade my bass for a pristine '66 - pretty to look at but side by side my bass would blow it out of the water sonically.
I've posted it before here - sorry for the redundancy
View attachment 1077546
View attachment 1077566
Original owner played with a horn band - a lot (B-flat fret-board wear)
View attachment 1077568