TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Fender flats are which color on silk?
That is a good one. My contribution:
All bright silks
E .95 MC 14- Emerald Green
A .75- MC10- Red
D Unkn. ref - (kind of dull greenish gold color)
G .40- MC3- Kingfisher blue
Ball end silk : same as othe bout; endballs are all black painted
These are : Rotosound's "SPACER - deluxe Nodamonic TM Bass Strings"
ref : RS 6006
The description says it is an homage to Jaco, who was the first to think about that colour system to ID strings.
Also comes with (quote) "The Nodamonic TM Formula OF [7x6.006xLS / 100xRWPn]= Spacer." Does anyone know what the fuzz it means ?
Those strings are very bright sounding.
Come in a posh all black package.
Hi guys, what a great and helpfull thread this is.
I would like your opinion on this set I got on a second hand bass:
Flats; red silks on both sides; 45-65-85-105 (if I measured corecctly); a tiny bit rough feel and not very evenly wound (but maybe it's age?); tension seems tiny a bit less than D'adaddario Chromes.
They sound and play great and I want to get a spare set... I've been going through the entire thread and I think these could be Rotosound Jazz Flats, but not sure. I have them on my fretless P, which if I'm right is the early Police days Sting setup.
Thanks for all help!
View attachment 4820708 View attachment 4820707
Flats; red silks on both sides; 45-65-85-105 (if I measured corecctly); a tiny bit rough feel and not very evenly wound (but maybe it's age?); tension seems tiny a bit less than D'adaddario Chromes....
I think these could be Rotosound Jazz Flats, but not sure...
I'm not a super expert like some, but to me they look like TI flats, more than Rotosound 77s.
First, TI Flats don't come in 45-65-85-105. Secondly, the description by @Martelino about their tension being "tiny bit less the D'Addario Chromes" points more to the Roto than the TI.

...and I thought Chromes were less tension than Rotos?![]()
Tension as in "stiffness" is a matter of perception. Between the Roto 77 and the Chromes, they're both at the stiff end of the spectrum, whereas the TI would be at the opposite end.
...just trying to do my best to add what I've learned/am learning from TB to what I already know![]()
When did Roto get rid of the silk at the bridge? When they changed the ball ends? My set with the colored balls doesn't have silks that end.
Roto 77 45-105 are 215 lbs
If there was a Chromes 45-105 set it would be 196 lbs
Even at 40-60-80-100 the Roto flats feels stiff.
When did Roto get rid of the silk at the bridge? When they changed the ball ends? My set with the colored balls doesn't have silks that end.
Yes, the Roto 77's before they started color-coding the ball ends did have silk at both ends.
The newer sets of Roto 77s I have (not sure how new? at least a couple of years old....) have black silk at the ball-end with the color-coded balls.....has Rotosound removed the silks entirely now?
The newer sets of Roto 77s I have (not sure how new? at least a couple of years old....) have black silk at the ball-end with the color-coded balls.....has Rotosound removed the silks entirely now?
Thanks KaraQ, first I also thought it could be TI's, but the gauge is really different, and I had TI's some time ago and I recall them to be more smootha nd shiny.I'm not a super expert like some, but to me they look like TI flats, more than Rotosound 77s.
The bridge end looks different.....
Rotosound 77:
View attachment 4820715
![]()
You're right about the tension, but it's very close. It could also be the Chromes feel a bit more stiff to me because they're new and on a fatter neck.Like I said, not a super expert, and that I was just going by how the windings/wrap looks on the ball-end ---- all the Rotosounds I've ever seen (flats or otherwise) look like the one I posted a pic of....
...and I thought Chromes were less tension than Rotos?![]()