alexclaber
Commercial User
Vic said:Front.
IMHO rear ports are too limiting because they don't work on large stages or outdoors.
Groan...
Alex
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Vic said:Front.
IMHO rear ports are too limiting because they don't work on large stages or outdoors.
MichaelVee said:Tom B., I believe you know of this as well. It's only a matter of time before this builder makes this new line available.
The resemblance is beyond uncanny. It may very well be the exact same line of cabinets, and this same company is going to build them for Skjold.
I think it's also safe to "release" that at least some of the drivers Pete is using will be custom as well, so to maybe add a bit to Tom's comment, it's not just the enclosure that's unique to Pete, it's everything.tombowlus said:A good attorney knows how to keep his mouth shut.
I am, however, authorized to say that Pete is not directly manufacturing these cabs, and they are being OEM'd by another company for Pete. I can also say that Pete was heavily involved in the design of the Skjold cabs, and that these cabs are specific to him and that the manufacturer will not offer identical cabs under a different brand name.
Tom.
Vic said:I think it's also safe to "release" that at least some of the drivers Pete is using will be custom as well, so to maybe add a bit to Tom's comment, it's not just the enclosure that's unique to Pete, it's everything.
????alexclaber said:Groan...Vic said:IMHO rear ports are too limiting because they don't work on large stages or outdoors.
Yeah, I hope it didn't sound like counterpoint, it was intended as just a little bit of an add-on.tombowlus said:Good point. That's what I was getting at.![]()
Vic said:Front.
IMHO rear ports are too limiting because they don't work on large stages or outdoors.
hmmm... they still look like LDS cabs... there I said it, LDS!!tombowlus said:A good attorney knows how to keep his mouth shut.
I am, however, authorized to say that Pete is not directly manufacturing these cabs, and they are being OEM'd by another company for Pete. I can also say that Pete was heavily involved in the design of the Skjold cabs, and that these cabs are specific to him and that the manufacturer will not offer identical cabs under a different brand name.
Tom.
Vic said:????
Hey, just IMHO based on personal experience. I don't claim to know what everyone likes.
My big problem with rear ports are when you can't use the reflection the rear ports depend on (AFAIK, anyway). If there's too much open space, all you really hear at that point, besides the bass coming from the FOH (which is pretty much pure mud on stage), is the "direct" sound from the front of your cab(s), and if they're rear ported, IMHO, they sound thin in those cases as compared to front ported cabs.
FYI, I welcome differing opinions, and even correction if need be, but it sure seemed that way to me when I tried to use rear ported cabs...
j-raj said:hmmm... they still look like LDS cabs... there I said it, LDS!!
![]()
tombowlus said:Survey says!!!
XXX
Wrong answer!![]()
![]()
Blues Cat said:Correct! Finally, someone who subscribes to my theory of rear porting.
People are still making rear ported cabs.![]()
cheezewiz said:LOL! I know who's making the Skjold cabs, and it AIN'T LDS!![]()
IMHO, it's a cardinal sin to send a "wet" signal to FOH, and this is a perfect example why. This will never happen to me. My stage rig is STRICTLY for stage monitoring, and THAT'S ALL. I want to be able to control my stage sound w'out worrying about screwing up the production folks (I'm dead set against that). YMMV, IMHO.Blues Cat said:When the the sound gets thin outdoors you tend to compensate by cranking the bass. If you're running a line out the soundman hates it & the musians behind & slightly to the side get hammered w/bass that you'll never hear.
I had a chance to test this theory last Christmas at an outdoor service w/a rear ported ampeg. The nearest wall was 80ft away. I had to crank the bass which sent to much to FOH. I had to set the amp to indoor EQ and get a 4 foot rack door to place behind it w/a blanket around it to keep it from rattleing. Couldn't wait for the gig to be over.
Vic, you must have some good ears. Tech guys will argue all day that bass is omni directional.
Yea, except for when it's fired backwards out of a port.
Vic said:My big problem with rear ports are when you can't use the reflection the rear ports depend on
Blues Cat said:Correct! Finally, someone who subscribes to my theory of rear porting.
Blues Cat said:When the the sound gets thin outdoors you tend to compensate by cranking the bass. If you're running a line out the soundman hates it & the musians behind & slightly to the side get hammered w/bass that you'll never hear.
I had a chance to test this theory last Christmas at an outdoor service w/a rear ported ampeg. The nearest wall was 80ft away. I had to crank the bass which sent to much to FOH. I had to set the amp to indoor EQ and get a 4 foot rack door to place behind it w/a blanket around it to keep it from rattleing. Couldn't wait for the gig to be over.
Vic, you must have some good ears. Tech guys will argue all day that bass is omni directional.
Yea, except for when it's fired backwards out of a port.
KJung said:My experience is that cabs with rear ports that are tuned very high (and hence have directional sound coming out of the port) like the Bag End small 115's seem to be much more 'room dependent' than other cabs, and sound absolutely terrible without something behind them, and also sound more boomy than traditionally ported cabs when lodged in a corner.
However, cabs like Acme's that are tuned very low and have those 'omnidirectional long waves' or whatever theyare coming out of the port, are much less problematic, and don't really behave differently than front mounted porting.
This is only from my experience owning these two cabs and other front ported cabs over a lot of gigs... I surely don't have the EE credentials to back this up, and I admit what I experienced with the Bag Ends could be due to something else (general poor cab design, the high roll-off of those cabs that needs a room to 'fill out', etc., etc.).
KJung said:Zillions of posts on this.... no convergence on opinion.
My experience is that cabs with rear ports that are tuned very high (and hence have directional sound coming out of the port) like the Bag End small 115's seem to be much more 'room dependent' than other cabs, and sound absolutely terrible without something behind them, and also sound more boomy than traditionally ported cabs when lodged in a corner.
However, cabs like Acme's that are tuned very low and have those 'omnidirectional long waves' or whatever theyare coming out of the port, are much less problematic, and don't really behave differently than front mounted porting.
This is only from my experience owning these two cabs and other front ported cabs over a lot of gigs... I surely don't have the EE credentials to back this up, and I admit what I experienced with the Bag Ends could be due to something else (general poor cab design, the high roll-off of those cabs that needs a room to 'fill out', etc., etc.).
j-raj said:ok... ok... Jorg is doing 'em, right?
(j/k Tom)

alexclaber said:I'm not sure of the tuning of those Bag Ends but I can't see it being high enough to cause directional port output. I think what you're seeing more of is a shortage of low bass, some mid-bass hump, and therefore a boom when the cab is in a corner and those inevitably boomy mid-bass frequencies are accentuated.