• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Smooth Jazz is Jazz

I love the fact that it hasn't really changed much in the last 40 years. Are there any other genres you can say the same about?
Acoustic blues
Bluegrass
pretty much everything in New Orleans
Bebop/straight-ahead jazz
Swing jazz
American Folk
Classical Western music
Classical Indian music
Rockabilly
Prog Rock
Classic Rock
Afrobeat
Ska
Calypso
Bossa nova, Samba, several other Brazilian forms

I'm sure there are others...
 
As some have already said, I don't think there's a definitive line between "smooth" jazz and "real" jazz.
Genre borders are always fuzzy. That's why discussions about genre can be, how shall I put it... inconclusive and endless.

Anyway. The borders are fuzzy, but the center is solid. I.e. no one should have a problem saying that Wayne Shorter is a Real Jazz Musician, and Kenny G is... not.


Here's one that is pretty definitely "real" jazz (I mean, it's Joe Pass, ffs :)). But if I heard it on a smooth jazz station I think it would fit right in.
I don't see how being played on a "smooth jazz station" actually means it is "Smooth Jazz." It just means some station programmer (or more likely, algorithm) thought it might appeal to listeners of that station.
 
Genre borders are always fuzzy. That's why discussions about genre can be, how shall I put it... inconclusive and endless.

Anyway. The borders are fuzzy, but the center is solid. I.e. no one should have a problem saying that Wayne Shorter is a Real Jazz Musician, and Kenny G is... not.



I don't see how being played on a "smooth jazz station" actually means it is "Smooth Jazz." It just means some station programmer (or more likely, algorithm) thought it might appeal to listeners of that station.

Genre borders are always fuzzy. That's why discussions about genre can be, how shall I put it... inconclusive and endless.

Anyway. The borders are fuzzy, but the center is solid. I.e. no one should have a problem saying that Wayne Shorter is a Real Jazz Musician, and Kenny G is... not.



I don't see how being played on a "smooth jazz station" actually means it is "Smooth Jazz." It just means some station programmer (or more likely, algorithm) thought it might appeal to listeners of that station.
I pretty directly did NOT deem it to be smooth jazz. Just used it as an example of some badass playing that could fit with smooth jazz programming, ie, the boundary is not a mile high and set in stone.
 
Wow, did not know that (obviously), thank you for sharing that information.

It's mildly ironic/coincidental that the sax player in the video I posted played for Ian Dury, who also had polio as a child.
It's kind of funny. I've known of some guys who try to imitate Sanborn's playing, and they did the same side-of-the-mouth thing that he does without knowing why...presumably because they thought it looked cool.

Yeah, in Dave's case it's because of polio.
In Kenny G's case it's so he can play and smile at the same time. :laugh:
 
  • Like
Reactions: BlueTalon
Let’s not fall into the trap where we feel superior because we like this and don’t like that. All kinds of people make all kinds of music for all kinds of reasons. No-one is the arbitrator of creative validity. None of us gets to bestow kudos on our own particular taste in music.

I'm with you, though in a less diplomatic way. Once people get into this judging music as, 'for people less evolved than me', or who see some sort of musical pecking order toped by the 'we advanced, more knowledgeable about music, lucky few', then I've got to think they've missed the whole point of making music. ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: retslock
...
Classical Western music
...

You need to get out more! :) Classical music in the widest sense has probably evolved more than all of the others put together. Some may not be to everyone's taste, and some may not be easily recognised as music by the more casual listener. But contemporary classical music is anything but a re-hashing of the music of the past. It really has moved on since Bach, Haydn, Mozart, Beethoven and Stravinsky. And the is the point - modern composers respect the past, and sometimes even quote from it, but not to the point of blind deference. Can the same really be said of Jazz?
 
  • Like
Reactions: ajkula66
I like it when I need to be soothed after a hard day. It helps me to relax and some of the playing is excellent in that genre. Just because it is "easy listening" doesn't make it trash. Another thing it's good for is jamming to. Like a backing track with extra solo instruments to compete with. :roflmao: This is not meant to replace other forms of jazz, it is just another option that fills a niche nicely.