This last week I listened to a video that Andy posted on FB...I said to myself as I was shaking my head...Andy, you got the skills going on but, that bass just doesn't have the sound that I personally like to hear. Definately not as nice to the ears as SPECTORS. IMHO.
FINGER FUNK JAM - Andrew Irvine - Warwick - YouTube
Well I'll always say that I consider Andy a friend and although I understand why he took the position with Warwick I feel bad that he's now promoting an instrument that in my opinion doesn't live up to the hype that I know he feels compelled to bring to the projects he works on.
He's an EMG Endorsed Artist... so right there he's had to ask WW to remove their standard MEC pups and install EMGs. I'm not sure about the tone circuit, it may be the standard WW MEC circuit. So you've got EMGs married to the MEC circuit... that right there can perhaps account for the tonal change that you don't find as nice as that coming from a SPECTOR.
And when you look at the woods used in his two WW basses... Not that there's any conclusive proof that AAA maple sounds different than AAAA maple (the rating has to do with the amount of figuring the wood grain has), I was still blown away that his black Streamer (which I've ragged him about it looking very similar to the Black Pearl) cost nearly $4000 more and uses inferior grade woods to that of a standard NS-2.
The wood is AAAA quilt top... not solid. It has an Alder back. The neck is AAA and the fingerboard is AAA. The issue I have with the neck is that the main part is Flame Maple. Pretty, but it's not as stable as Rock Maple in the long haul. It's not as rigid as Rock Maple so the neck will vibrate at a different frequency than a Euro or USA SPECTOR.
In all, and no disrespect to Andy, his $10,000 Warwick is like a Europe Series SPECTOR with a really nice AAAA quilt top. Something you could probably have built by SPECTOR for under $4,000 (this is totally a guess but based on my knowledge of other previous special orders). And the LED neck lights are a $1783 option for WW which can be done by Sims Customs for $850 plus the cost of shipping the bass to England and back.
To me, Warwick Streamers will always be behind the original NS-Bass. It's the difference between the new Jaguar coupe and coupe convertible... a respectable car no doubt... and the Aston Martin that it so closely resembles. No question which came first, which is the better made, which is the more desirable. The only place this analogy doesn't work is with the Aston Martin/Jaguar scenario... the copy (Jaguar) is 1/2 the price of the original. In the SPECTOR/Warwick scenario, the copy (the Warwick) costs more.
It doesn't really make sense to me.
And so everyone is sure of what I am getting at. I'm not talking about any other Warwick model. They don't apply to this issue. My beef is only with the design they "borrowed" from Ned and Stuart... the Streamer.