• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

SPECTOR® Club - Part 22

Status
Not open for further replies.
This last week I listened to a video that Andy posted on FB...I said to myself as I was shaking my head...Andy, you got the skills going on but, that bass just doesn't have the sound that I personally like to hear. Definately not as nice to the ears as SPECTORS. IMHO.
FINGER FUNK JAM - Andrew Irvine - Warwick - YouTube

Well I'll always say that I consider Andy a friend and although I understand why he took the position with Warwick I feel bad that he's now promoting an instrument that in my opinion doesn't live up to the hype that I know he feels compelled to bring to the projects he works on.

He's an EMG Endorsed Artist... so right there he's had to ask WW to remove their standard MEC pups and install EMGs. I'm not sure about the tone circuit, it may be the standard WW MEC circuit. So you've got EMGs married to the MEC circuit... that right there can perhaps account for the tonal change that you don't find as nice as that coming from a SPECTOR.

And when you look at the woods used in his two WW basses... Not that there's any conclusive proof that AAA maple sounds different than AAAA maple (the rating has to do with the amount of figuring the wood grain has), I was still blown away that his black Streamer (which I've ragged him about it looking very similar to the Black Pearl) cost nearly $4000 more and uses inferior grade woods to that of a standard NS-2.

The wood is AAAA quilt top... not solid. It has an Alder back. The neck is AAA and the fingerboard is AAA. The issue I have with the neck is that the main part is Flame Maple. Pretty, but it's not as stable as Rock Maple in the long haul. It's not as rigid as Rock Maple so the neck will vibrate at a different frequency than a Euro or USA SPECTOR.

In all, and no disrespect to Andy, his $10,000 Warwick is like a Europe Series SPECTOR with a really nice AAAA quilt top. Something you could probably have built by SPECTOR for under $4,000 (this is totally a guess but based on my knowledge of other previous special orders). And the LED neck lights are a $1783 option for WW which can be done by Sims Customs for $850 plus the cost of shipping the bass to England and back.

To me, Warwick Streamers will always be behind the original NS-Bass. It's the difference between the new Jaguar coupe and coupe convertible... a respectable car no doubt... and the Aston Martin that it so closely resembles. No question which came first, which is the better made, which is the more desirable. The only place this analogy doesn't work is with the Aston Martin/Jaguar scenario... the copy (Jaguar) is 1/2 the price of the original. In the SPECTOR/Warwick scenario, the copy (the Warwick) costs more.

It doesn't really make sense to me.

And so everyone is sure of what I am getting at. I'm not talking about any other Warwick model. They don't apply to this issue. My beef is only with the design they "borrowed" from Ned and Stuart... the Streamer.
 
iceboxbass said:
I've seen in some of his videos Ampeg rigs...I swear I did!

Then had you ever tried the Ampeg PR line? My PR-410HLF along with the PF-500 mates and loved my NS-95 to death!!! That thing was "Low B Sonic blaster"!!!! Lol It'd make your hair stand straight out permanently! Lol :D

+1,000,000,000,000!!!! Couldn't say it better!

And ther you go...Why would any SPECTOR loyal member want to support that?! This last week I listened to a video that Andy posted on FB...I said to myself as I was shaking my head...Andy, you got the skills going on but, that bass just doesn't have the sound that I personally like to hear. Definately not as nice to the ears as SPECTORS. IMHO.
FINGER FUNK JAM - Andrew Irvine - Warwick - YouTube

Yes! I opened it this morning on my iPhone.

At the end of the day, the music biz, is a biz. If he's getting paid to play and putting food on the table then good for him. If you can't play the best basses made doing that, might as well go for the best copy out there. Great player , but that wick sounds like azz compared to his Spector clips. Can't fault a guy for trying to make a living though in my book.
 
Well I'll always say that I consider Andy a friend and although I understand why he took the position with Warwick I feel bad that he's now promoting an instrument that in my opinion doesn't live up to the hype that I know he feels compelled to bring to the projects he works on.

He's an EMG Endorsed Artist... so right there he's had to ask WW to remove their standard MEC pups and install EMGs. I'm not sure about the tone circuit, it may be the standard WW MEC circuit. So you've got EMGs married to the MEC circuit... that right there can perhaps account for the tonal change that you don't find as nice as that coming from a SPECTOR.

And when you look at the woods used in his two WW basses... Not that there's any conclusive proof that AAA maple sounds different than AAAA maple (the rating has to do with the amount of figuring the wood grain has), I was still blown away that his black Streamer (which I've ragged him about it looking very similar to the Black Pearl) cost nearly $4000 more and uses inferior grade woods to that of a standard NS-2.

The wood is AAAA quilt top... not solid. It has an Alder back. The neck is AAA and the fingerboard is AAA. The issue I have with the neck is that the main part is Flame Maple. Pretty, but it's not as stable as Rock Maple in the long haul. It's not as rigid as Rock Maple so the neck will vibrate at a different frequency than a Euro or USA SPECTOR.

In all, and no disrespect to Andy, his $10,000 Warwick is like a Europe Series SPECTOR with a really nice AAAA quilt top. Something you could probably have built by SPECTOR for under $4,000 (this is totally a guess but based on my knowledge of other previous special orders). And the LED neck lights are a $1783 option for WW which can be done by Sims Customs for $850 plus the cost of shipping the bass to England and back.

To me, Warwick Streamers will always be behind the original NS-Bass. It's the difference between the new Jaguar coupe and coupe convertible... a respectable car no doubt... and the Aston Martin that it so closely resembles. No question which came first, which is the better made, which is the more desirable. The only place this analogy doesn't work is with the Aston Martin/Jaguar scenario... the copy (Jaguar) is 1/2 the price of the original. In the SPECTOR/Warwick scenario, the copy (the Warwick) costs more.

It doesn't really make sense to me.

And so everyone is sure of what I am getting at. I'm not talking about any other Warwick model. They don't apply to this issue. My beef is only with the design they "borrowed" from Ned and Stuart... the Streamer.
Funny thing is, if you go on some of the Warwick threads, many long time users will tell you that the ones made now (post 1996 I believe is the change point for whatever reason) are crap in comparison to the older ones. Yet their prices have skyrocketed.
 
They can fix that. Usually they loosen the rod , clamp the neck to a straight edge and let it sit for a week. Get a fret level n polish and it will play like butter.
To Evil Undead:
There's a really basic fix similar to this that sometimes works. I had success with it on a Carruthers 5 I used to own that had a maxxed rod.

Take the strings off and completely loosen the rod (not out).
Bass face down, put the bass in between two chairs with it resting on the headstock and the body. The neck will be a bridge between the chairs.
Find a way to apply some weight to the middle of the neck. Not too much, just enough to create a little more backbow than already present. I took two belts, strapped them around the neck about six inches apart and hung about a 20 pound dumbell (each end in a belt suspended below the neck).

Left it like that for several days.
Tighten the rod back up to max (not too tight) with the weight still on the neck if possible (I know..tricky).
Undo the weight and put the strings back on and tune to pitch (if the strings aren't too low to sound. Otherwise carefully guess).
If the procedure worked, even within a day you should still have a backbow where the strings are laying on the neck (or extremely low and buzzy). If so, loosen the truss rod about a 1/4 turn (contrary to popular belief, you do not need to de-tune when loosening a truss rod as the release of force
is going in the same direction as string tension).

Wait at least 12 hours. Your bass probably went flat. Retune and check the action. Repeat this last step as neccessary.

Good Luck.
 
LimaGuy said:
Love the bass tone in this mix.
How was it recorded?

to the opposite end of the spectrum;
I'm thinking the cymbals and hat are a bit thin

but it may also be my ears which are shot for high end frequencies ;)

Bass was 2 tracks. One axe fx ampeg svt model. The other was a direct line using a free sansamp vst from TSE. Yeah the cymbals might need a bit of work. I've never used these drums before and I'm testing a new mix as well. Thanks for the input Lima!!!!!
 
Funny thing is, if you go on some of the Warwick threads, many long time users will tell you that the ones made now (post 1996 I believe is the change point for whatever reason) are crap in comparison to the older ones. Yet their prices have skyrocketed.

I hear you. And to me "Custom Shop" means just that... something that's hand-made and customized to the musician ordering it. But I've heard from former WW employees that the custom shop stuff they make is really no different than the standard German-made models. Everything is CNC with very little human "hands-on" work.

Stuart has a CNC to get the general shape of the neck... to about 80% of the finished product, it saves time, but the crucial 20% finish work is done by hand. And the radius work on fingerboards are still hand-finished 100% as is fret cutting, installation and crowning. The CNC has allowed for Stuart to produce more, the old way would take 2 hours to do what the CNC now does in 15 minutes. But the thing that makes the SPECTOR Europe and USA Series basses so special is still present. An enormous amount of hands-on human-done work.

So yeah... I'm not sure how they justify the outrageous costs of their basses. They have some signature models that cost nearly $15,000 US dollars. And at that point you're talking about a top-of-the-line Fodera. Which to me is still an expensive bass, but at least you know with the Fodera it's all hand-made using the best woods and materials available. Vinny and crew make amazing basses which like SPECTORs are works of art in my opinion.

Look at Roscoe, Pedulla, Tobias, and even Sukop (I talked with him at BPL and really liked him and his wife. Really nice people making really beautiful custom-made, hand-made basses... about 5-7 a month in his workshop at his house)... These are true "Custom-Shop" instruments. As are the USA-Series SPECTORs... of course.

I don't know. I don't mean to be so negative but it so rubs me the wrong way. There aren't a lot of truly American Cultural standards... we are a melting pot of every different culture on this planet. But one thing I know that I was raised to believe in is that anything worth doing is worth doing right, and cutting corners, being unfair, cheating... it never allows you to win. For even if you do, you know that it wasn't a true victory.

Deep down inside I honestly believe that just because you and someone else do the same thing, offer similar products, whatever... that you can complete but still have respect for one another. That you can go after the same customer but it doesn't mean you have to dislike one another. I'd like to believe that there's enough bass and guitar players in the world that SPECTOR can do what it does and all the other guys can do what they do and everyone can be respectful and positive with one another. And I've seen it work. Mike Pedulla is a great guy. As is Mike Tobias. As is Steve Sukop... I've spoken with all of these guys at length and they're always very professional and respectful and they do their own thing and don't really worry about what others are doing.

Honestly Stuart lives by the same rules. It's guys like me who get bent out of shape when someone does something to someone they care about and it becomes something offensive to us on a personal level that probably keep this issue alive.

I only get worked up about it when I see people make comments that aren't accurate and therefore to do justice to my friends I jump in and retell the story the way it happened, to set the record straight.

I believe that if you do something wrong, you own it. And if it bothers you to be reminded of it, then you need to do something to make it right.

Lastly, I made a comment about "German Imperialism" earlier and it offended someone. And I want to say that I am sincerely sorry for that. I know that the majority of German people are kind, hard-working, honest people and they often get picked on because of WWI and WWII.

My last name is Stern. It's German. So it's not like I'm just picking on someone I don't know. I did consulting work for a couple of large, well respected German manufacturers. And my comment was more about what I said above about getting along with people you compete with. The German companies I've worked with in the past have been very aggressive, almost as if it was something personal that another company offered something similar to what they do. They treat competition as if they are the enemy and that what they do in the marketplace is more like a battlefield.

And this is an institutional attitude, not necessarily something that is individual based and can be attributed to the majority of the German people. I do have to admit I've seen it in my father, and I myself have an aggressive streak. To me the difference is that I focus on specific things to get angry about. Be honest, be professional and respectful and I have no problem with you. But lie, cheat, steal... and I'll have a fire in my stomach for you. LOL. To thy own self be true. And I've always been this way.

I'm sincerely sorry if that offends anyone. And please know that I don't have any issue with a musician choosing the instrument that they feel best gives them the "voice" they want to express the music inside of them. I never fault someone for owning a Warwick. My issue isn't with Warwick owners or even their artists like Andy. It's with HP Wilfer and the undeniably unfair and unprofessional way he's treated Stuart and Ned through the years. And Stuart and Ned are not alone. There's a list of other companies he's been unfair to as well.

Black and white are black and white. A spade is a spade. Fair is good and unfair is not. Pretty simple stuff. Not so simple to live by for some people I suppose.
 
Guys, I think this group needs to make a New Year's resolution not to waste so much time and words around Warwick "hate". This type of issue happens in the instrument industry all the time. Copy a style, change the headstock, and go on with life. If we start hating every manufacturer that has stolen a design, we'd run out of time in life.
 
I agree with grendle, however is Andy honestly believes that Streamers are better than NS's then I would be disappointed

Not that I'm all that smart... meaning I don't think I have the answers for everything. But I've studied human psychology since I was very young. We all do regardless if we are aware of it or not.

People are motived by often simple things, food, shelter, social status, the freedom to be expressive, etc... and in themselves these motivations are pretty straight forward.

But because we can think and apply logic... because we have brains that are designed to solve problems... we often make things way more complicated than they have to be.

There is a simple concept in psychology called "cognitive dissonance". It's a concept that attempts to explain how our beliefs and the reality around us sometimes clash and how we reconcile these differences so we don't completely break down mentally.

Good example is Andy. He's played SPECTOR basses for years. He's the kind of guy that wants to feel good about what he's doing, it's important to him that the music he plays and the instruments he plays his music with are of a certain quality. So he spends years thinking SPECTOR is the best. But he also has needs, bills to pay, a wife to support and things he wants to do that it takes money to be able to accomplish.

And so he's bound to a company that he loves but isn't able to provide him with financial support that he needs. So he finds a company that will. And he knows that their products are not as good as the previous company. But in his mind he doesn't want to step down to a lesser instrument. So he has two options... give up on part of his dream of working with the best, being the best and making a good living... or look for everything positive in the new company, purposefully overlooking the not so positive, to embrace that the new company's products are in some way better, so he doesn't have to look at his move as a step down.

I know Andy personally. And the whole SPECTOR-Warwick thing aside, I believe this is what he's had to do to stay focused on his dream. Which is a good dream to have BTW. So I don't fault him for his new-found enthusiasm for a guitar that is honestly a copy of the ones he originally used to play. I'm sure that he's sincere in what he says because he doesn't have a choice. To him, to accept that he's taken a step down to a lesser instrument wouldn't be a positive thing. And if you know Andy, the guy sincerely is a positive, nice guy. So his cognitive dissonance has been resolved by embracing his new company full-tilt.

There's a lot of other things that this sort of choice will eventually bring about. And he'll have to deal with those. Such as potential damage to his credibility... people may think that he's going to put a crazy positive spin on any product he's asked to promote because there seems to be a lack of balance regarding what he's saying. But who knows? Perhaps not.

But that's my take on the situation. He's a good guy. Warwicks are not bad basses by any stretch of the imagination. I think they're overpriced for what you get and there's a hype to what Andy's doing that is a little hard to buy. But at the end of the day there's a lot of positive things Andy can do to promote the bass as an instrument and there's a lot of young musicians that I hope he can inspire.

Regardless the brand of guitar you play... we are all brothers and sisters because we all have music in our hearts and souls.
 
Guys, I think this group needs to make a New Year's resolution not to waste so much time and words around Warwick "hate". This type of issue happens in the instrument industry all the time. Copy a style, change the headstock, and go on with life. If we start hating every manufacturer that has stolen a design, we'd run out of time in life.


I totally agree. Like I said, I only get off on this particular tangent when someone doesn't know the history and I feel that to honor Stuart and Ned I need to set it straight.

Sukop, BTW, makes a curved body bass. And I don't care. As does Ibanez. No problem. Copying the design isn't the issue. The Coda is a Fender Jazz copy, the X models are Thunderbird copies.

The issue has to do with not honoring a legally binding agreement and then being rude/ugly/unprofessional to people.

That's it in a nutshell.
 
Not that I'm all that smart... meaning I don't think I have the answers for everything. But I've studied human psychology since I was very young. We all do regardless if we are aware of it or not.

People are motived by often simple things, food, shelter, social status, the freedom to be expressive, etc... and in themselves these motivations are pretty straight forward.

But because we can think and apply logic... because we have brains that are designed to solve problems... we often make things way more complicated than they have to be.

There is a simple concept in psychology called "cognitive dissonance". It's a concept that attempts to explain how our beliefs and the reality around us sometimes clash and how we reconcile these differences so we don't completely break down mentally.

Good example is Andy. He's played SPECTOR basses for years. He's the kind of guy that wants to feel good about what he's doing, it's important to him that the music he plays and the instruments he plays his music with are of a certain quality. So he spends years thinking SPECTOR is the best. But he also has needs, bills to pay, a wife to support and things he wants to do that it takes money to be able to accomplish.

And so he's bound to a company that he loves but isn't able to provide him with financial support that he needs. So he finds a company that will. And he knows that their products are not as good as the previous company. But in his mind he doesn't want to step down to a lesser instrument. So he has two options... give up on part of his dream of working with the best, being the best and making a good living... or look for everything positive in the new company, purposefully overlooking the not so positive, to embrace that the new company's products are in some way better, so he doesn't have to look at his move as a step down.

I know Andy personally. And the whole SPECTOR-Warwick thing aside, I believe this is what he's had to do to stay focused on his dream. Which is a good dream to have BTW. So I don't fault him for his new-found enthusiasm for a guitar that is honestly a copy of the ones he originally used to play. I'm sure that he's sincere in what he says because he doesn't have a choice. To him, to accept that he's taken a step down to a lesser instrument wouldn't be a positive thing. And if you know Andy, the guy sincerely is a positive, nice guy. So his cognitive dissonance has been resolved by embracing his new company full-tilt.

There's a lot of other things that this sort of choice will eventually bring about. And he'll have to deal with those. Such as potential damage to his credibility... people may think that he's going to put a crazy positive spin on any product he's asked to promote because there seems to be a lack of balance regarding what he's saying. But who knows? Perhaps not.

But that's my take on the situation. He's a good guy. Warwicks are not bad basses by any stretch of the imagination. I think they're overpriced for what you get and there's a hype to what Andy's doing that is a little hard to buy. But at the end of the day there's a lot of positive things Andy can do to promote the bass as an instrument and there's a lot of young musicians that I hope he can inspire.

Regardless the brand of guitar you play... we are all brothers and sisters because we all have music in our hearts and souls.

Huh? I think his motives might be simpler than that. How long do you think he'd be a paid endorser if he slagged the company paying him?
 
To Evil Undead:
There's a really basic fix similar to this that sometimes works. I had success with it on a Carruthers 5 I used to own that had a maxxed rod.

Take the strings off and completely loosen the rod (not out).
Bass face down, put the bass in between two chairs with it resting on the headstock and the body. The neck will be a bridge between the chairs.
Find a way to apply some weight to the middle of the neck. Not too much, just enough to create a little more backbow than already present. I took two belts, strapped them around the neck about six inches apart and hung about a 20 pound dumbell (each end in a belt suspended below the neck).

Left it like that for several days.
Tighten the rod back up to max (not too tight) with the weight still on the neck if possible (I know..tricky).
Undo the weight and put the strings back on and tune to pitch (if the strings aren't too low to sound. Otherwise carefully guess).
If the procedure worked, even within a day you should still have a backbow where the strings are laying on the neck (or extremely low and buzzy). If so, loosen the truss rod about a 1/4 turn (contrary to popular belief, you do not need to de-tune when loosening a truss rod as the release of force
is going in the same direction as string tension).

Wait at least 12 hours. Your bass probably went flat. Retune and check the action. Repeat this last step as neccessary.

Good Luck.

This is a good suggestion. But also I'm wondering if you are needing backbow you can always turn the truss rod 180 degrees, reinsert it and go from there.

So if you've got the truss at maximum... this is for relief. But to lower string height you need backbow. I actually have 1/2 to 3/4 turn in the opposite direction on my NS-2/NS-4 to get the strings as low as they are.

Try releasing the tension on the truss all the way. Meaning absolutely NO tension on it.

ALWAYS MAKE SURE TO LOOSEN YOUR STRINGS BEFORE ADJUSTING YOUR TRUSS.

Once your at zero tension on the truss rod, before you tighten/tune the strings, look at the neck, look down the neck from right above the pickups at the top and then bottom edges. Look down the side of the neck at the frets. Do you see any relief or any backbow?

String height should be set using the bridge saddles. All you are doing with the truss rod is adjusting the bow or relief so that at your desired string height you can avoid fret buzzing.

the flatter the neck, the lower you should be able to set the strings.

String height will be higher with more relief.

Try this, with your truss rod at zero tension, if your neck has relief with no tension on the strings, then go ahead and tighten your strings and tune your bass. Then check again.
If you have a completely flat neck at zero tension, with strings under tension you'll have slight relief. So go ahead and adjust your bridge saddles to the height you want.

IF you get buzzing, then loosen your strings and turn the truss rod nut 1/4 turn, then tighten/tune and check again.

You have three variables in string height... your nut (which is a set variable and I don't recommend you filing at it). Your bridge saddles and your truss rod. Set the saddles at a height you like and then slowly adjust the truss to get rid of any buzzing.

To be honest, at 1/16th of an inch my NS-2 and NS-4 both have some slight buzzing if I don't hit the fret right, meaning I miss the note by not pressing down enough, etc... and this is to my naked ear. But when plugged in, there's no buzzing coming through the amp.

Some buzzing is fine. As long as the tuned string isn't dead and engaging a fret other than the one you play, your amp isn't going to pick up on it.

I may record a sample of what I'm talking about for you.

Anyway... try what I suggested.

And if you find you need backbow and not relief, you can completely remove the truss rod nut, carefully pull the truss rod out of your bass's neck, flip it 180 degrees and reinsert it. Now when you add tension you're adding backbow and not relief.

A bass with relief set really high is going to have a silly amount of string height. I think you should adjust your bridge saddles and start over.

Let me know if you have any problems.
 
Huh? I think his motives might be simpler than that. How long do you think he'd be a paid endorser if he slagged the company paying him?

See. I was being all deep thinking and stuff. Yeah I'm sure that's part of it too. LOL.

I don't mind people saying I'm aggressive, loyal to a fault, etc... but I sincerely do try to be positive and objective, even on a subject that gets under my skin.
 
guy n. cognito said:
Guys, I think this group needs to make a New Year's resolution not to waste so much time and words around Warwick "hate". This type of issue happens in the instrument industry all the time. Copy a style, change the headstock, and go on with life. If we start hating every manufacturer that has stolen a design, we'd run out of time in life.

Completely agree Guy. I've said this in previous threads.

JPSBassist said:
Not that I'm all that smart... meaning I don't think I have the answers for everything. But I've studied human psychology since I was very young. We all do regardless if we are aware of it or not.

People are motived by often simple things, food, shelter, social status, the freedom to be expressive, etc... and in themselves these motivations are pretty straight forward.

But because we can think and apply logic... because we have brains that are designed to solve problems... we often make things way more complicated than they have to be.

There is a simple concept in psychology called "cognitive dissonance". It's a concept that attempts to explain how our beliefs and the reality around us sometimes clash and how we reconcile these differences so we don't completely break down mentally.

Good example is Andy. He's played SPECTOR basses for years. He's the kind of guy that wants to feel good about what he's doing, it's important to him that the music he plays and the instruments he plays his music with are of a certain quality. So he spends years thinking SPECTOR is the best. But he also has needs, bills to pay, a wife to support and things he wants to do that it takes money to be able to accomplish.

And so he's bound to a company that he loves but isn't able to provide him with financial support that he needs. So he finds a company that will. And he knows that their products are not as good as the previous company. But in his mind he doesn't want to step down to a lesser instrument. So he has two options... give up on part of his dream of working with the best, being the best and making a good living... or look for everything positive in the new company, purposefully overlooking the not so positive, to embrace that the new company's products are in some way better, so he doesn't have to look at his move as a step down.

I know Andy personally. And the whole SPECTOR-Warwick thing aside, I believe this is what he's had to do to stay focused on his dream. Which is a good dream to have BTW. So I don't fault him for his new-found enthusiasm for a guitar that is honestly a copy of the ones he originally used to play. I'm sure that he's sincere in what he says because he doesn't have a choice. To him, to accept that he's taken a step down to a lesser instrument wouldn't be a positive thing. And if you know Andy, the guy sincerely is a positive, nice guy. So his cognitive dissonance has been resolved by embracing his new company full-tilt.

There's a lot of other things that this sort of choice will eventually bring about. And he'll have to deal with those. Such as potential damage to his credibility... people may think that he's going to put a crazy positive spin on any product he's asked to promote because there seems to be a lack of balance regarding what he's saying. But who knows? Perhaps not.

But that's my take on the situation. He's a good guy. Warwicks are not bad basses by any stretch of the imagination. I think they're overpriced for what you get and there's a hype to what Andy's doing that is a little hard to buy. But at the end of the day there's a lot of positive things Andy can do to promote the bass as an instrument and there's a lot of young musicians that I hope he can inspire.

Regardless the brand of guitar you play... we are all brothers and sisters because we all have music in our hearts and souls.

I think Andy will promote any company that will pay him and gladly say they're better than what he previously played because he's being payed to do so.

Also did Andy have any US Spectors? I've only seen him demo-ing Euro's.


guy n. cognito said:
Huh? I think his motives might be simpler than that. How long do you think he'd be a paid endorser if he slagged the company paying him?

Agreed.
 
I won't get ya started on the Rob Trijilio Sig bass ....... 10k$? really??? I think that's so they don't have to make too many lol.

Lol someone has to poke JP to make sure he's ok over there once in a wile lol.

Hey JP how's the knee? Mine is finally pretty good after about 4-5 mo :(

LOL. Rob's a great guy but he's jumped around endorsements a few times. I'm not sure I'd even recognize his signature bass.

And my knee is shot. I need surgery but I don't want to be in a cast at NAMM. So I've been doing physical therapy 4 times a week and I'm wearing a leg brace. So at NAMM I want people to call me Quasimoto. :D

I'll get it fixed after the dust from NAMM settles.

And right now there's not enough time in the day. For the first time in the history of SPECTOR there WILL NOT be a printed catalog of all the available models for 2012.

Trying to fully utilize my skills, we're doing an interactive DVD. So I'm slammed with shooting footage, editing, getting the script finalized and recorded (I have an actress friend who is going to be the "voice" of SPECTOR) and everything to the DVD publisher so they'll be ready at the show. :D

That and major site changes, the finishing of the SPECTOR Corporate site, the SPECTOR Electric Guitars site and the launch of the new SPECTORCentral... which will be the Official SPECTOR Fan website.

And I'm filming a Tone Comparison series with SPECTOR artists to demonstrate the tonal capabilities of different SPECTOR models.

My plate is stupid-overflowing-full.

But it's a good thing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.