Still showing mid June. That's like next week. I shall continue with normal respiration, but I do hope they ship this time.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I have both a zoom MS-60b and a sansamp programmable bass driver. I can say without a doubt that the sansamp is noticably better when compared to the zoom's sansamp module. But if you tend to only use the sansamp for a cleaner tone, go zoom because their are so many good effects and the clean tone is comparable. I still prefer the bass fly rig though and will be selling my zoom to fund the fly rig since it is less complicated at my feet for individual effects. (I realize B3 has individual effects, but only 3) and I don't need all the effects of the zoom.
I have an MS-60B.
Great little everything-in-one pedal, but absolutely not a substitute for the BFR.
The MS-60B has a demanding, thought-provoking programming scheme. It takes a lot of forethought to figure out a sequence of patches in order to cycle through various sounds during a set.
The BFR would be much friendlier live, especially if you have to be able to react quickly to sudden set changes, improv sections, etc. Want a quick volume boost? Kick the button. Want more grit? Kick the button. Everything is just a click away.
One other thing: the MS-60B is good for the price point. But it doesn't sound as good as my real gear, whether we're talking amps, compressors, etc.
During my recent experiments with the guitar Fly Rig, it impressed me with being a sonic step up from my current setup. If the BFR is equally good, then there will be no comparison to the little red Zoom.
Yes the B3 somewhat resolves this issue but there are only 3 pedals you can use at once. Another up side is that the vaste number of effects to choose from are all good and have a lot of parameters. But the distortions and drives to my ear are very weak (same as any digital multieffect). In my opinion, unless you need to use all the effects of the B3 that the BFR wont have, which keep in mind is 3 at a time, you are better off spend the little extra on the BFR. Or at least thats what I'm doing.Yes the simplicity of stomping on a foot switch in the middle of a set definitely beats fiddling with patches and presets, does the B3 resolve this issue though? Curious because I'm considering buying it and unsure of it's real world application.
Yes the B3 somewhat resolves this issue but there are only 3 pedals you can use at once. Another up side is that the vaste number of effects to choose from are all good and have a lot of parameters. But the distortions and drives to my ear are very weak (same as any digital multieffect). In my opinion, unless you need to use all the effects of the B3 that the BFR wont have, which keep in mind is 3 at a time, you are better off spend the little extra on the BFR. Or at least thats what I'm doing.
The distortion patches does seem to be the Achilles' heel of the B3 as observed by many users.
What was the difference?Newer version of the manual up. I'll take this as a good sign.
Invalid Link Removed
Must have updated it a few weeks ago because I already saw all that stuff.The older version didn't get as in depth with the unit. Not as much about the octafilter section, zero mention of the bite switch, no sample settings.
Because GAS wants it now.I don't understand all this fuss over shipping delays.