• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

The Acoustic Club

I need to sell one of these or I'll be in the same boat!
 

Attachments

  • 360 pair.JPG
    360 pair.JPG
    379.5 KB · Views: 48
Agreed! I own a similar rig (80's vintage Peavey 115 w/either ACC 120 or 320 head). Turned on it's side, the Peavey cab is just the right width to match those wider sized heads. I blacked out the grill so they look well matched.
View attachment 3592929
I just picked up a mint 120 just like that. Much lighter than my 220 but almost as loud! Its gonna save my back thankfully.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ghostinthemach
Acoustic added the 120 to the line in 1980, and both the 120 and 220 were produced through 1982. The 120 had fewer output transistors and it eliminated the graphic EQ plate and associated black plastic bezel and foam dust filter behind the plate. It's totally subjective, but based on the number of output devices the 120 could be considered the logical successor to the 140/150 and the 220 the logical successor to the 370.
 
Acoustic added the 120 to the line in 1980, and both the 120 and 220 were produced through 1982. The 120 had fewer output transistors and it eliminated the graphic EQ plate and associated black plastic bezel and foam dust filter behind the plate. It's totally subjective, but based on the number of output devices the 120 could be considered the logical successor to the 140/150 and the 220 the logical successor to the 370.
Thanks for that. Cleared things up. The back panel on the 120 is also simpler, with no foot switch jack and different fuse holders. Sounds pretty much identical to the 220. Like I said earlier, I was expecting this to be a quieter amp for practice and rehearsals......Nope...... Thing is LOUD!:laugh:
 

Latest posts